You can never have enough open lettersNo the people who asked for bugfixes to take priority over new content are just a little upset that bugfixes have taken priority over new content.
There'll be an open letter about it soon.
You can never have enough open lettersNo the people who asked for bugfixes to take priority over new content are just a little upset that bugfixes have taken priority over new content.
There'll be an open letter about it soon.
"Another half a year to wait" ?
I'm going to lavecon this year and hopefully talk to some of the devs."LaveCon is loads of fun, and chatting with the devs in person is very cool!"
I suspect that these 2 sentences, from the 'Open Letter' could be the 'bone of contention':You should read it again then![]()
"LaveCon is loads of fun, and chatting with the devs in person is very cool!"
Fleet Carriers are scheduled for Q2, while news on New Era is coming in Summer after FCThe middle of 2020 FD will be releasing news about New Era, and by then FC should be out or out soon.
Delay FC again and FD will be rightly ridiculed. Delay New Era more and people will frankly give up or stop playing while they wait (and not spend money in the shop) and most likely never come back.
That schedules and plans for video games should be left to the professionals. That the community's whims should be mostly ignored. And, that influencers shouldn't be trusted.
They asked for stuff. Always risky that.
I suspect that these 2 sentences, from the 'Open Letter' could be the 'bone of contention':
We don’t ask for new content and we don’t ask for a major shift in development. We simply want everything already delivered to be maintained properly.
It certainly felt as though "The Community" (as represented by the signees, not the overall 'community') were implying that everything be stopped to correct existing bugs...
That the very minimum of 'suggestions' in this document appear to have been adopted by Frontier (a 5 day beta - despite a 2 week minimum being requested) and then used as a 'reason' to delay new content would certainly indicate that "The Community" requests were responsible for Fleet Carriers being delayed...
I suppose words can mean what ever you want them to, irrespective of what they actually say.I suspect that these 2 sentences, from the 'Open Letter' could be the 'bone of contention':
We don’t ask for new content and we don’t ask for a major shift in development. We simply want everything already delivered to be maintained properly.
It certainly felt as though "The Community" (as represented by the signees, not the overall 'community') were implying that everything be stopped to correct existing bugs...
That the very minimum of 'suggestions' in this document appear to have been adopted by Frontier (a 5 day beta - despite a 2 week minimum being requested) and then used as a 'reason' to delay new content would certainly indicate that "The Community" requests were responsible for Fleet Carriers being delayed...
Fleet Carriers are scheduled for Q2, while news on New Era is coming in Summer after FC
I'm sorry that you don't like bug fixes, public betas, and empowered Community Managers.
If you're referring to Content Creators, they are listed at the bottom of the signatories section of the Community Requests letterYou're not sorry.
Let me expand on what I am referring to. Self importance on the scale seen in that open letter deserves nothing but scorn. Anything of benefit we players might gain from what happened will have been a happy accident. FD has gotten me and us where we are, I don;t believe attention seeking 'influencers' have the game's best interests at heart. I'd just assume we let the professionals handle things. I mean real professionals, not the random internet types armed with video editing tools.
If you're referring to Content Creators, they are listed at the bottom of the signatories section of the Community Requests letter
That is true, as a native English speaker, with a very good education, my reading such sentences, as presented in the overall tone of the document quoted from, is certain to have misinterpreted it, and to have that point brought to my attention by one of the 'original signatures' of said open letter.I suppose words can mean what ever you want them to, irrespective of what they actually say.
The bugs are going to happen. Not just in this one game, all games. Post ur issue in the tracker and move on. Don't turn the community against the developer.I'm sorry that you don't like bug fixes.
Absolutely: my name is clearly visible as supporting the Community Requests of bug fixes, open betas, and empowered Community ManagersThat is true, as a native English speaker, with a very good education, my reading such sentences, as presented in the overall tone of the document quoted from, is certain to have misinterpreted it, and to have that point brought to my attention by one of the 'original signatures' of said open letter.
You are not unbiased in your argument, StuartGT, by virtue of owning the 3rd 'signature' on that letter.