Nah. that's just the normal reaction of a normal/straight-forward honest person to the massively tuned/tweaked/selective reality talk you'll always find in Publications for Investors.
I'm no different in that respect - when I read marketing hogwash, I call it out as such.
When people boast about "telling it like it is", it translates into considering their own opinion on everything to be "how it is".
If you were so intent on "calling out hogwash" you would have made note of the negative tone of the commentary aligning with what was said by Eliza. For instance, the nonsensical "no mention of quality" in reference to cosmetics, just a vehicle to shoehorn a complaint in where it made no sense to do so.
And maybe - a little - it could be because OP almost appears to have become some sort of PR outlet for Frontier (in other times found pushing OA Videos), judging the chosen emphasis, recent threads (Livestream summary with supposed FC news Thread) and how well he's prepared to dig up Information from uncommon sources almost in near realtime to step in for FDev.
Just a gut feeling though, so no harm done.
But you certainly felt the need to introduce that conspiracy theory.
Stewart's the mod of the ED Reddit, of course he pays attention to this stuff. For somebody who declared to be so against hogwash, you certainly aren't averse to spreading it.
"No harm done", but you were quick to level an accusation and then hedge it in with "just a gut feeling".
I'm just the kind of guy who in the background sometimes wonders if someone is pushing/following an agenda and how trustworthy/honest/legit it is as a result.
So you're wondering how honest Stewart posting
excerpts of materials posted by FD is. The OP of the threads you're so very suspicious about is just calling attention to information by directly referencing it. It's not "honest or dishonest" because it's
not his content he's posting. You may as well suspect a thermometer of having a hidden agenda.
PS.
That financial report is stamped 05 February 2020 07:00, so less than 2 hours old when the OP got hold of it, found sufficient time to skim for highlights - which is something that's a tad unusual in my books.
The document isn't huge and it's not hard to navigate. He took the paragraphs with mention of Elite. Literally Find "Elite". 11 mentions in the document body, 11 instances in Stewart's post. Not very complex.
If anything, details like those raise eyebrows with me, so I personally read things from there on with a grain of salt so to speak (not finding the exact right words there).
Yes, you have mentioned how you think you approach things in such an enlightened manner compared to others.
Stewart posted excerpts from a document with
no commentary attached in the OP. You posted a conspiracy theory with suspicions based on loose conjecture. But you're accusing Stewart of having an agenda?
