The videos are not mine, they are from someone else, but as I consider them interesting I put them hereVery awesome video!
I also watched this video. you are making really great videos.
I hope we see all the animals you're talking about in this game. especially aquatic animals.
I think it's too optimistic.
Frontier knew we wanted a fox. We've wanted a fox since before launch, there were interviews where it was said we wanted a fox, and in the Arctic DLC we got another wolf.
I don't mind copy-paste animals, but I feel like this is indicative of what sorts of things we can expect. An Australia DLC can't go without a kangaroo, but that will take a lot of work since it's wholly unique and unlike any other animal in the game (unlike everything we got in the Arctic Pack, which were all similar enough to other animals that there can be cross-coding using animations from other animals spiced up with new ones). The kangaroo will be a from-scratch model, animation set, and AI, and will take a long time to get right. So, if they endeavour to create it, which they will have to, because we're talking about Australia, I strongly suspect the other animals we get in the DLC will be far more simplistic. Freshwater crocodile, dingo, perentie or lace monitor.
The video mentions these animals, but he also states that they are "less likely" because of crossover with existing animals. Well, we already know that Frontier isn't too worried about that - grizzly/Himalayan brown bears. Galapagos/Aldabra giant tortoises. Komodo dragon/Nile monitor. All very similar, all sharing the same animations, needs, AI, and so on. They did the same thing with Zoo Tycoon 2013 and the subsequent Ultimate Animal Collection; every animal in that game was a copy-paste of its core group. The sun bear, a bear unlike any other bear in the world, was just a recoloured brown bear.
They've already improved this method of content creation for Planet Zoo, I will grant them that, but they're still limiting themselves by taking the easy route with several animals. So I can't be too optimistic about future DLC's.
Of course, here's hoping I'm wrong. I certainly would rather be pleasantly surprised.
Really curious about that one, where did you get this info? And what kind of suffocating limitations are referring to? (isn't this just blaming the big company because ZT2013 wasn't the game people were expecting?)To be fair, keep in mind that Zoo Tycoon 2013 was made under the suffocating limitations of Microsoft at the time.
Really curious about that one, where did you get this info? And what kind of suffocating limitations are referring to? (isn't this just blaming the big company because ZT2013 wasn't the game people were expecting?)
Saw too many topics about similar topics. Like in PZ some users expected features from ZT, because "If ZT had that feature, it had to be in PZ".. Sometimes difficult to distinguish fact from assumption.
I'm also hoping for some bigger DLC packs than 4 animals in 1 pack, but I'm realistic and think/expect that "JWE and the Arctic DLC" logic applies to the upcoming DLC.
Anything more than that is a pleasant surprise.
That's my point, I don't see "likely criticism" from other Microsoft products as a confirmation for limitations by Microsoft. A bit too player/user assumptions imoThere's a LOT of valid criticism toward Microsoft in the past decade, that makes all this feel a bit too likely. Or at least, hard for me to deny.
Good point they can be called animal demonstrations or something like that.I'd rather like demonstrations, where the animal is triggered to do something that is typical natural behaviour for that animal and is not something that would be called a "show".
The word "show" and animals combined really turns me off.
I'd rather like demonstrations, where the animal is triggered to do something that is typical natural behaviour for that animal and is not something that would be called a "show".
The word "show" and animals combined really turns me off.