Still? Good to know!
I'm told ALD is quite hands on.
Still? Good to know!
None of the PvP activities, including but not limited to everything that affect any BGS and PP, depend on anyone ever consenting. You consent to playing the game by playing the game. To single out FPS (Fighting Player Ships) as the single activity that need additional consent is hypocritical*.Did I? I thought I asked whether there were any reasons other than the ones I listed for NON-consensual PvP but I guess I somehow messed that up. Apologies, English in not my native language, I do speak sarcasm though.
First off, the only person pressing the block button is you. If you're going to rely on such weak sauce strategies at least own up to it. "Your choice not mine" my shiny, metal arx.
Beyond that you don't know how easy it is to not just survive, but thrive in Open? Your last paragraph there couldn't be further from the mark, kid.
Wrong, I asked:No. You asked us to prove people that didn't want PvP were horrible people.
Then that raises the question: Why?
Other than the obvious of course, such as: people who do not like PvP aren't going to be prepared for it and probably aren't very good at it so I can feel really badass while have little to no skill whatsoever.
Or maybe, people who do not enjoy PvP are going to be very upset when I blow them up and I, being an asphole, get off on making strangers feel bad.
Or it might be as simple as not caring about other players because you are selfish and putting your own enjoyment over that of ever one else's...
So just explain to me why you think it's so important you get to impose your play-style onto others whether they like it or not because honestly I do not understand why you are so important you get to dictate the rules of engagement...
Convince me that players insisting on non-consensual PvP aren't horrible people...if you can.
You clearly only read the last line of my post an even then managed to misread it because:They're obviously not.
In any case, there have been examples of reasons for PvP that are quite good. What do you think of them?
Convince me that players insisting on non-consensual PvP aren't horrible people...if you can.
lets face it no one except the gankers would lose anything if a PvP flag was introduced
PvP depends on your playstyle.
- If you want to be an evil pirate that's okay. I don't think it is normal for pirates to ask for permission to attack.
- If you want to just be a psycho and gank every moving object, well.... okay.
In both of these cases I wish player actions stuck with the player/account, not the ship. I understand why it is, I just wish it was different. I think actions should have consequences. Irrelevant cause that is not how the game is. If wishes were horses we would all be eating steak. (Jane Cobb)
Personally I play as a semi well adjusted human similar to real life. I don't walk up to random strangers on the sidewalk and punch them in the face. Yes this is a video game detached from reality but I like to lightly RP as a well adjusted normal space pilot, and I don't believe in swapping ships to hide my past behaviors. If I want another character I will get another account. But this is just my personal playstyle choice.
My issue is with people who feel they should have the right to involve people in activities they do not enjoy. The insistence bit is crucial in this context because lets face it no one except the gankers would lose anything if a PvP flag was introduced (assuming it would work perfect and could not be abused.)
The flag wouldn't even have to prevent PvP just call it an IFF, have the pilots federation enforce sanctions against CMDRs who kill other CMDRs. Take away their membership card and docking privileges. Should provide some of those precious consequences some people insist the game should have.
My issue is with people who feel they should have the right to involve people in activities they do not enjoy
Your actions in game may make me take certain actions in game, your choice not mine, Ive never blocked anyone for saying hello, your choice not mine.
Not sure what you mean by the last statement, especially with zero knowledge of my playstyle. I have been in Open only (bar the end on one session) since November 2019, I do thrive thankyou, I just don't have time for idiots.
Don't bother responding, the kid remark just got you blocked, cba with immature behaviour in or out of game, that's my choice.
Wrong, I asked:
You clearly only read the last line of my post an even then managed to misread it because:
My issue is with people who feel they should have the right to involve people in activities they do not enjoy. The insistence bit is crucial in this context because lets face it no one except the gankers would lose anything if a PvP flag was introduced (assuming it would work perfect and could not be abused.)
The flag wouldn't even have to prevent PvP just call it an IFF, have the pilots federation enforce sanctions against CMDRs who kill other CMDRs. Take away their membership card and docking privileges. Should provide some of those precious consequences some people insist the game should have.
Oh and yes, there are good reasons for PvP even for non-consensual PvP and even in E: D (Ganking the gankers...). I can think of at least one and frankly I'm surprised no one has pointed that out.
And Phisto, if you're worried the shoe fits, it might be time to re-evaluate your behaviour.
Notoriety is attached to the player in the same way as being hostile with a faction is.
Your "flag" is for a player to stow weapons, turn off shields, and become a helpless target. Your flag idea is a huge benifit to gankers.
If you truly wanted what your Original Post is hinting at you would be asking FDev for an actual PvP flag. Something that pops-up when scanning a ship. Instead you are asking players like myself place myself in a completely helpless fetal position in the hopes that some lowlife scum doesn't blow away my ship. If I'm getting attacked by NPCs during a trade run and a complete stranger shows up you think I should stow weapons or get blown out of my ship? Your proposed idea is completely ridiculous, and I assume this entire thread is a troll.
Edit: I just remembered, FDev has given us a PvP flag. It is the wanted status. If someone is flying around with a bounty on them that is your flag.
I think you're confusing me with the OP
You can all argue how much you want but at the end of the day you got what yout got what the designer made a game of and sold to you. Meaning the blame is not (always) the other players.
Fines & bounties are associated with the ship, not the player. Notoriety is local faction based, so a player can be a complete psycho in one system, run to another system and swap ships.
--> Having never gone ganking, pirating, or overall psycho I am assuming this is correct from what I have read. Feel free to correct this assumption.
Then that raises the question: Why?
Other than the obvious of course, such as: people who do not like PvP aren't going to be prepared for it and probably aren't very good at it so I can feel really badass while have little to no skill whatsoever.
Or maybe, people who do not enjoy PvP are going to be very upset when I blow them up and I, being an asphole, get off on making strangers feel bad.
Or it might be as simple as not caring about other players because you are selfish and putting your own enjoyment over that of ever one else's...
So just explain to me why you think it's so important you get to impose your play-style onto others whether they like it or not because honestly I do not understand why you are so important you get to dictate the rules of engagement...
Convince me that players insisting on non-consensual PvP aren't horrible people...if you can.
Please do go ahead and read my response to you. I know I'm not Phisto, but surely that's not the only thing that matter. Unless of course you don't have a response to why you specifically demand additional consent from FPS activities.My issue is with people who feel they should have the right to involve people in activities they do not enjoy. The insistence bit is crucial in this context because lets face it no one except the gankers would lose anything if a PvP flag was introduced (assuming it would work perfect and could not be abused.)
The flag wouldn't even have to prevent PvP just call it an IFF, have the pilots federation enforce sanctions against CMDRs who kill other CMDRs. Take away their membership card and docking privileges. Should provide some of those precious consequences some people insist the game should have.
Oh and yes, there are good reasons for PvP even for non-consensual PvP and even in E: D (Ganking the gankers...). I can think of at least one and frankly I'm surprised no one has pointed that out.
And Phisto, if you're worried the shoe fits, it might be time to re-evaluate your behaviour.
None of the PvP activities, including but not limited to everything that affect any BGS and PP, depend on anyone ever consenting. You consent to playing the game by playing the game. To single out FPS (Fighting Player Ships) as the single activity that need additional consent is hypocritical*.
*Unless you are a special snowflake who never have and never will do anything to affect the BGS in any system, and think all those other activities also require additional consent. Then props to you for your dedication.
ummm - isn't that exactly what you are proposing? Forcing everyone else to conform to your idea of how the game should be played?
Maybe I'm wrong but that really is how I (and others) see your suggestion.
If you do anything to any system where BGS is enabled you stomp on someones toes. Why treat Fighting Player Ships differently to every other activity?I don't, I see his suggestion as probably implausible but completely rational. If one's 'style' is stomping on the toes of someone else then yea, that 'style' has problems in my personal view. In my country we have a certain well known politician whos' style is making other people suffer, causing the wanton disruption of saftey and security to millions. His supporters say that's his 'style'. The rest of us, the majority of us say he's a sadistic monster. A question of style, or something else ?
Having said all that i'm quite happy to play in Solo. I like it Solo, enjoy the game immensely and do not for one moment miss the ability to waive at another living commander. I enjoy the game as much as one can and without the mayhem of another players 'style'.
I don't, I see his suggestion as probably implausible but completely rational. If one's 'style' is stomping on the toes of someone else then yea, that 'style' has problems in my personal view.