TBH, I'm more concerned about secondary purposes the overt data could be used for than the possibility of
covert data being collected.
I mean, if it turned out that the app' is logging your phone-calls or browser history that'd
obviously be cause for complaint.
I'd be very surprised if that was the case, though.
It's more the fact that governments don't seem to be able to help themselves when it comes to appropriating data for authoritarian purposes.
Give them a means of tracking a bunch of people and they WILL, sooner or later, use it for other purposes.
And that's when they're not selling your data to third-parties or leaving it in taxicabs.
Couple of years ago I was working in Spain, where they have toll-roads which you can pay for via an RFID doodad in your back window.
I fly home to the UK, for a holiday.
I get a phone-call from the British embassy, telling me that the Spanish police want to interview me and they're concerned I'd "fled the country".
I explain that I'll be back in Spain in 10 days and arrangements are made.
When I get back, Spanish cops meet me at the airport, arrest me and the Brit embassy sends a lawyer too.
Turns out there was a fatal accident on a road where I was, apparently, driving that involved a "pick up truck".
The cops just used the data from the toll-road to check every vehicle on the road at that time, noticed I was driving a Toyota HiLux and that I'd left the country 2 days later.
Apparently, that was enough for them to issue an arrest warrant and contact the Brit' embassy.
So, having ruined my vacation, been arrested at the airport and got 2 embassies involved, it took about 2 minutes, back at my place of work, to show them my HiLux, in all it's shiny, undamaged, glory.
Providing governments
any information that they don't have a specific, justifable, need for is not something I approve of.
Also, can't wait to see this tracker become "compulsory".
I look forward to making use of my shiny new government-issue smartphone and data-plan.