That might be ok if we run a t-test with low enough sample numbers.
VR support 'not at launch' for Odyssey
- Thread starter Lordxenu
- Start date
Yes, and the 'may' (and its corollary, 'may not'), are one of the key sources of the general concern.
It’s pretty understandable that us VR lot who have both: (A) Enjoyed ED a ton more in VR than flat, & (B) Been eagerly anticipating these particular roadmapped expansions for up to 6 years... are disappointed. And would be at our most disappointed if VR were never to arrive for the expansion. As is quite possible.
Personally I recognise the difficulties FDev are faced with, understand the decision, and was prepared for it.
But that doesn’t mean that: ‘You can continue to play the current game' or 'VR may come to the expansion' are hugely satisfactory arguments for putting that disappointment aside.
I think you’ll find that most VR-heads will continue to canvas for FDev to add VR support if at all possible
i did not mean to imply i would be happy with it being a separate game, but from the previous comment that would make more sense than to not continue to add it to a game that supports it....and actually promotes it....also one that does VR so well
I guess I finally get it, thanks for your patience...
I guess I finally get it, thanks for your patience...
it has been a pleasure....it is sometimes hard to get points across accurately on a flatscreen
A glass half full of tears?
half a glass of water
A measure of gin.
I'd hoped it was White Rum...
Vr removes your ability to read?, Shocking
Yep this is a silver lining. We could definitely do with some clarity on how much of the new tech is liable to be accessible to VR/Horizons players though.
(There are plenty of VR heads who seem to think they’ll be driving SRVs on Atmos planets in VR. That certainly doesn’t seem to be the plan...)
But even the use of new planetary tech in Horizons is an assumption at this point. (Especially given Horizons planetary tech wasn’t back-ported to the core game, seemingly, for planets at distance etc)
Will definitely be top of my questions to devs over the next months
I think I'll let someone else say it for me ...In your own words describe this
Look, I'm pointing things out to the VR users who seem a bit confused. OK?
This was the point I made after reading the Dev Post - not the "No VR for the FPS bit"...
I'm completely in favour of supporting the request for confirmation of "later" or "Add after Launch"...
But that was how I read it then too
I think you might need to type it in VR for them?
Or maybe they are having trouble because they won't take their goggles off?
Hah, I’m a glass half-full kinda guy thanks
. Fully hydrated, and happily perusing the VR games I’ll be playing over the coming months and years.But the thing about chippy optimistic people is, they’re always convinced they can change the world
I’m afraid your trite 'stop talking about this thing I don’t care about' postings will do nothing to inhibit myself and others from pushing for our promised land wherever possible
True about back-porting of Horizons planets to vanilla Elite, but there's a reason for that, which is vanilla Elite doesn't support compute shaders at all, because vanilla Elite (at the time) had to maintain Mac compatibility.Yep this is a silver lining. We could definitely do with some clarity on how much of the new tech is liable to be accessible to VR/Horizons players though.
(There are plenty of VR heads who seem to think they’ll be driving SRVs on Atmos planets in VR. That certainly doesn’t seem to be the plan...)
But even the use of new planetary tech in Horizons is an assumption at this point. (Especially given Horizons planetary tech wasn’t back-ported to the core game, seemingly, for planets at distance etc)
Will definitely be top of my questions to devs over the next months