I linked this before but yours is in 4k so ok
No no, you can't be nice about this. There should be a duel! In Theatres of War! To the death! Or Desync... whichever happens first.
Star Citizen Discussion Thread v11
- Thread starter Sir.Tj
- Start date
-
- Tags
- star citizen
- Status
No no, you can't be nice about this. There should be a duel! In Theatres of War! To the death! Or Desync... whichever happens first.
Oooh. Tricky. A race between random timers — now that's some compelling gameplay right there.
Nonono. This is StarSync™ — a much more advanced and never-done-before desync that is actually good for Star Citizen. It increases the fidelity in the ion channel latency and depolarisation simulacrum system, and you wouldn't want a space sim without that now would you?
Last edited:
Viajero
Volunteer Moderator
Thanks for that. This would suggest that the increased load on the servers due to the free fly was not the root of the Invictus week issues. Or at least not the main one. It would actually suggest the main culprit is the build itself.
Oooh. Tricky. A race between random timers — now that's some compelling gameplay right there.
Nonono. This is StarSync™ — a much more advanced and never-done-before desync that is actually good for Star Citizen. It increases the fidelity in the ion channel latency and depolarisation simulacrum system, and you wouldn't want a space sim without that now would you?
I'd still say it was the servers...due to how random the issues are across the board. Some folks after the 16k-7 errorfest logging in can actually have a reasonable game despite the existing known errors and desync...a lot of folk can't and either have account related errors where they have their gear randomly missing or appear invisible. It's too random to be just the build outside of the inventory bugs tied to LTP and SSOCS and the random 30k server disconnects losing them all their earned cash.
I had a 5 hour session of multiplayer mining and general tomfoolery the other night without a break...even though I had 3 initial 16k-7 authentication errors whilst trying to log in. Once I was in game...besides the party chat, desync and party system being borked (known error) and booting a couple of my mates out to desktop once or twice, it was a decent enough session...as Star Citizen sessions go.
Last edited:
I don't think it is as much about the number of words but rather the information:wordcount ratio. I honestly think that if you take all his posts in these topics together they form a larger novel than my doctoral thesis, and you can pretty much get 95% of the content summarized on the back of a napkin. Don't let that stop him though, it seems at times to be a form of catharsis and it aint harming anybody so fine by me.
Opinions usually can be summarized on the back of a napkin, no exceptions. Your doctoral thesis also was written with far more words then necessary I m sure and probably didnt convey anything new nobody else knew already? Such work is more like an opportunity for you to present an idea or theory others know already in your own words allowing others to judge your understanding of the matter.
You can of course simply throw one-liners back and forth in an argument but everybody who ever participated in a debate or argument knows that such behavior never brings conclusion. Even in debates where the participants dont manage to convince the others of their view are not wasted time tho as a "well written post" can be a lot of things. Funny, entertaining, revealing, suggestive etc. I try to relay my view on things in a more detailed manner then a 12 year old would. I also would like to read a little more in return but some people simply dont have the time nor the urge to do that. Thats okay.
You are correct, writing relaxes and brings me distance to the topic. The longer I take to concoct a post the more time I have to think about what I m trying to say. I have deleted countless drafts in the past when I noticed that I was starting to ramble or lose myself in ideas and theories. But I put in effort because I respect the people who read my posts. As such I have learned things like structure, grammer and vocabulary over the years (not a native english speaker) in order to transport my thoughts and that alone is of tremendous value to me.
Its not my intention to "slay" anybody with my posts and regardless how much I write....if I only would provide quantity without quality/meaning it would take people only a simple retort to obliterate my posts. That nobody really tried so far either means that my goal to silence people with volumes of words works or there is no real counter argument. Because the only thing I ve seen so far in that regard is
whaaaa, that guy writes a lot
So put me on ignore or dont read my posts in the first place. I have no doubt that lots of people dont bother to reply to me out of fear to trigger yet another wall of text or dont bother because they cant be ar sed to raise the effort. I m usually confused that they wont answer in detail or share what they really think but are always ready to leave a snarky comment instead.....as if that would help them score points somehow. Dont want to read a lot of words.....dont go on a forum /doh
Walls of text are not a successful approach to dominate in a discussion, least of all THIS discussion because as people have proven countless times they are not afraid to dig into a post and analyze what has been said. Quite a few white knights write a lot without saying much and their posts rival mine in length. Sadly their versions are equal to Star Citizen.....mostly fluff and not a whole lot of meat. Also they heavily lean on visual help to drive their point home which isnt really very hard to grasp.
Star Citizen looks good.....thats about it. There, didnt even need a napkin for that.
Anyway even tho the 11 versions of this thread repeat themselves its no secret that people who havent been in on it from the start never bother to dig up its past so whatever has been said in the past or is well known to long-time observers might be news to them. As such I find that it cant hurt to provide a form of summary from time to time and the more refined facts and history become, the longer the posts.
Context also is critically important if you want to understand a discussion or argument. In order to avoid confusion or misunderstanding you have to be as exact or detailed as possible.
You are correct that the core of my view would fit the back of a napkin but if you tried to understand where I m coming from or why I have this view this little napkin wouldnt help you a whole lot now would it? Most people in this thread dont need the extra explanation for sure but occasionally we have posters who honestly dont seem to know the facts or misunderstand something.
I m glad we agree that I dont need anybodies permission to write my posts
I m sure the provided ignore functionality is helping anybody who doesnt want to read lots of words or is tired of my "tirades" ^^
Not only is he smoking something illegal...dude is wearing my armour fer goodness sake
The version you posted hides the in-engine flaws of the Star Citizen video much better IMO.I linked this before but yours is in 4k so ok
![[VR] Merkir](https://forums-cdn.zaonce.net/data/avatars/m/141/141091.jpg?1553527154){kind=avatar}
Context? I don't need context, this is Star Citizen...
It obviously stands for Estimated Time to Failure.
Brilliant!
The pair on the other side of the table from Chris.
Yup, the guy on the left of the two.
That's a lovely landscape he's flying through, but then I'm a sucker for procgen and snowscapes.
So, just watching this discussion from SaltEMike
Now, i assume this is based on something CIG have said, but apparently ToW has 10 devs allocated to it, including Sean Tracy (lead) and 3 artists, so only 6 devs.
So, they are still having problems making SC with 600 people while they expect to make ToW a decent product with 6? Counterpoint is made how like NMS started with 6 devs. Escape from Tarkov is being developed by 100 and still has issuers.
Mike talks about CIG trying to make multiple games (SQ42, SC, ToW, AC, SM) but then points out how they are dependent on the core functions that don't exist yet.
Its kind of a mix of clarity with the odd bit of fantasy.
Now, i assume this is based on something CIG have said, but apparently ToW has 10 devs allocated to it, including Sean Tracy (lead) and 3 artists, so only 6 devs.
So, they are still having problems making SC with 600 people while they expect to make ToW a decent product with 6? Counterpoint is made how like NMS started with 6 devs. Escape from Tarkov is being developed by 100 and still has issuers.
Mike talks about CIG trying to make multiple games (SQ42, SC, ToW, AC, SM) but then points out how they are dependent on the core functions that don't exist yet.
Its kind of a mix of clarity with the odd bit of fantasy.
Humph - almost doesn't seem worth posting in here if no-one reads
- Status