PvP pve in open idea

I wonder how big someone's ego has to be to let them think that people who've never heard of them and don't care at all about their playstyle are "hiding" from them. It's on a par with Donald Trump thinking that people who wear face masks are doing it to show disapproval of him.
 
Actually there are 3 fields stacked like a multiverse where one scoring a goal in their respective field ain't gonner be affected by the other players in the other 2 fields.
So tell me exactly how that's a level playing field?
 
@Brrokk
It's not about ego the discussion is about fixing the overall galaxy content to put us all in one pot affecting it.
I love this game. Contrary to what you might think I do so much more than just combat. I flip systems solo. I exploit crash sites I mine solo I do all these things. As does most others.
Does it work? The current mechanics? Yes in a screwed up weird get away with vibe yeah it does. Barely.
To me it's broken and Lots would agree. Again from all walks of the game.
 
Actually there are 3 fields stacked like a multiverse where one scoring a goal in their respective field ain't gonner be affected by the other players in the other 2 fields.
So tell me exactly how that's a level playing field?
Because a goal scored in one of the 'verses has no impact on any of the others.
 

Robert Maynard

Volunteer Moderator
Actually there are 3 fields stacked like a multiverse where one scoring a goal in their respective field ain't gonner be affected by the other players in the other 2 fields.
So tell me exactly how that's a level playing field?
Is this a reference to the three game platforms or the three game modes?

If it's the latter, it's each player's choice whether to play in a game mode where they may engage or be engaged in PvP - the BGS doesn't care what mode a player is in though.
 
The only reasons why people opt for solo etc is to avoid combat and get rich and mine...
Really?

I ain't rich, nor do I mine... (I also don't play solo - but 2 of 3 accounts 'live' mostly in PG)

Me, I just want to play the game and enjoy the time I spend in it - that usually means either alone or with a couple of friends... The game provides sufficient 'distraction' from my chosen tasks with NPC interference, all is fine :)

I know you class yourself as a 'good guy', that's fine - but, hard though it may be to comprehend, some of us just want to play and enjoy what the game has to offer without sharing that game time with a bunch of randoms... Nowt to do with getting rich or mining...
 
@Brrokk
It's not about ego the discussion is about fixing the overall galaxy content to put us all in one pot affecting it.
I love this game. Contrary to what you might think I do so much more than just combat. I flip systems solo. I exploit crash sites I mine solo I do all these things. As does most others.
Does it work? The current mechanics? Yes in a screwed up weird get away with vibe yeah it does. Barely.
To me it's broken and Lots would agree. Again from all walks of the game.
All good IMO. I was just complaining about the use of the word "hiding", which shows ignorance of what other people want in their play. At the extreme there are Solo players who want a single-player game with no human interaction; they aren't hiding, they're using the game features to get the play they want - as we all do. I would need really excessive ego, an assumption that the game is all about me, to describe this as "hiding".

(Edit) If Solo players are described as "hidden", that's literally true, but "hiding" implies some intentionality which is only there in the mind of the person complaining about it.
 
Last edited:
And I totally agree you should be allowed to in the same pot. It would add to the overall game experience. We wing up pgs cos it's easier. No interventions. Times precious. I'm just saying if it was all in open it would be a bit more spicy! Who knows who may come intervene in a cz. The factions players for example.
Say I and a few buddies went to a system in war at random with a player faction in open and went to cz then we should be able to find each other in the cz.. that's an example.

And not have that option of pgs or soloing it
 

Robert Maynard

Volunteer Moderator
I'm just saying if it was all in open it would be a bit more spicy!
What some find "spicy", others find "bland and uninteresting".
And not have that option of pgs or soloing it
As the three game modes have been part of the game design at the outset, along with the mode shared galaxy, I don't see them or the shared nature of the galaxy changing more than five years after release - especially given that the most that Frontier have publicly considered is a potential change to Powerplay (and Powerplay was the only game feature considered by Frontier to be suited for such a potential change) to make it either Open only or given a bonus for playing in Open. That investigation started in May 2018 - we have yet to hear the outcome.
 
Last edited:
...I'm just saying if it was all in open it would be a bit more spicy!
All of the 'spicy' stuff is in open - didn't you notice?

Why should the rest of us for whom the modes present a fairly relaxing gameplay want 'spicy' just because you do?

Leave it out - we just don't want the same thing - why be bothered with the ones who have no wish to play alongside you and your 'spicy bois'? Are we not allowed 'our' game too?
 
And how would my spicy game affect yours? Would I be following you..have you ganked someone are you wanted?
Cos if you did...if you are. Then yeah I should be near your proximity. But if your mining in borann II legally minding your own...chances are ill fly past ensuring your safety. Can't see why your so hostile against what's essentially realism.
Single players yes I know. God knows I've mined 15 bill solo. I agree. But I also think it would be better having one huge melting pot and all that goes into it.
And l can say it as much as l like
 
All of the 'spicy' stuff is in open - didn't you notice?

Why should the rest of us for whom the modes present a fairly relaxing gameplay want 'spicy' just because you do?

Leave it out - we just don't want the same thing - why be bothered with the ones who have no wish to play alongside you and your 'spicy bois'? Are we not allowed 'our' game too?

I guess that's the dealbreaker, some people want a casual elite, some want spicy elite. Any change to the current system would harm one sides experience for sure..
 
Right and I respect that
But it isn't real is it? That you be in space in ed capable of not ever having combat... unless you've found a cave somewhere.
The only reasons why people opt for solo etc is to avoid combat and get rich and mine vs npcs that are harmless at best. To effect bgs and so on. In no way does any of that content reflect a SIM.
Period

Thats not ALL reasons. Some ppl want just to relax among the stars. Much easier to relax without worrying that someone might wreck u.
Surely its not... "realistic" and i totally understand ur point that u want more content and stuff BUT if ppl doesnt want it - then u shouldnt force them (as u are opting for open only but with more protection).
Cause ultimate goal of video game is to have fun.

I 100% agree with you. Unfortunately, the "lawful" PvPers out here are some of the biggest scum bags in Elite and use questionable tactics and premium ammo and are no fun to fight with.
Omg and noobs in deicat are fun to fight with?
 
You wingers criticise and contribute nothing.
I stated In Op post that I exploit the stupidity of the games mechanics as much as anyone else. So why single it out.?
I'm gonner goto my cave now. Flip some stuff hunt an generally be an annoyance to those who deserve it hehe
 

Robert Maynard

Volunteer Moderator
And how would my spicy game affect yours? Would I be following you..have you ganked someone are you wanted?
Cos if you did...if you are. Then yeah I should be near your proximity. But if your mining in borann II legally minding your own...chances are ill fly past ensuring your safety. Can't see why your so hostile against what's essentially realism.
What other players want or consider necessary is of no real importance. A player's choice of who to play with precedes and over-rides any desire that other players may have to play with them.

It's already been established that it's not "real" - it's a video game - a video game where no player requires to engage in in-the-same-instance PvP, ever. Given that the game will have attracted players who have no interest in PvP, it should not be unexpected that there is opposition to an attempt to force all players to play in a PvP enabled game mode.
Single players yes I know. God knows I've mined 15 bill solo. I agree. But I also think it would be better having one huge melting pot and all that goes into it.
And l can say it as much as l like
Of course - just as others can express their opinions regarding the benefits of the three game modes.
 
I guess that's the dealbreaker, some people want a casual elite, some want spicy elite. Any change to the current system would harm one sides experience for sure..
Of course - that is why Frontier were wise enough to give players choice...

I just find it curious that there are a minority of players who continually demand that choice be removed to make 'everyone' share the same pot...
I wonder how such a 'lawful' player would interpret things if I had a notoriety of 10 and several 100 million bounty, would that mean I was a ganker?
 
Back
Top Bottom