Honestly, I wasn't thinking at all about what you said, I was replying to the post I quoted, which was not one of yours.
Regardless, the gist of it was to illustrate an example where a self-proclaimed lawful group is using tactics they have explicitly borrowed from what they define as gankers and griefers. But then try to make it out that they are different, because they're doing these things for the right reasons, and anyways, these "bad people" are so bad that even doing bad things to them isn't bad because they're bad people who deserve bad things to happen to them. In a nutshell, I mean.
The difference between the lawfuls and outlaws in that instance is merely the air of moral superiority presumed about actions which the lawful themselves equate precisely to ganking and griefing, and which activites they own are intended as such. That moral superiority is then doubled-down via the statement that the players they target are so morally corrupt that no amount of presumably negative play experience is too severe to serve as their punishment.
You have to assume their conclusion - that they are targeting "bad guys" - to be true before you can accept the validity of their premises and means, and that they somehow rise above the actions of the outlaws in the course of doing their thing.
I honestly don't care either way, and I actually like it better when it's got that strong odor of hypocrisy about it. But that may just be my anti-authoritarian leanings showing their colors.
So you are specifically targeting an individual or group and calling them out because they specifically call out individuals or groups?
Gotcha.
ETA this whole thread has just been trying to bait Spear members, hasn't it? Just trolling for bait.