Question for Open players who don't like PVP/ganking... help me understand

Honestly, I wasn't thinking at all about what you said, I was replying to the post I quoted, which was not one of yours.

Regardless, the gist of it was to illustrate an example where a self-proclaimed lawful group is using tactics they have explicitly borrowed from what they define as gankers and griefers. But then try to make it out that they are different, because they're doing these things for the right reasons, and anyways, these "bad people" are so bad that even doing bad things to them isn't bad because they're bad people who deserve bad things to happen to them. In a nutshell, I mean.

The difference between the lawfuls and outlaws in that instance is merely the air of moral superiority presumed about actions which the lawful themselves equate precisely to ganking and griefing, and which activites they own are intended as such. That moral superiority is then doubled-down via the statement that the players they target are so morally corrupt that no amount of presumably negative play experience is too severe to serve as their punishment.

You have to assume their conclusion - that they are targeting "bad guys" - to be true before you can accept the validity of their premises and means, and that they somehow rise above the actions of the outlaws in the course of doing their thing.

I honestly don't care either way, and I actually like it better when it's got that strong odor of hypocrisy about it. But that may just be my anti-authoritarian leanings showing their colors.

So you are specifically targeting an individual or group and calling them out because they specifically call out individuals or groups?

Gotcha.


ETA this whole thread has just been trying to bait Spear members, hasn't it? Just trolling for bait.
 
kys___secret_agent_sheep_by_stickfigurenamedzil_d2r2n4r-fullview.jpg
 
I don't care about evasion or accusations of it. I try to answer questions directly.

What I do, if I don't like something (not taking responsibility in this case), is judge, and react. That is me playing my way :)
Right, so you playing your way is to tell me to let them play their way but when someone else plays their way, your way is to call them out on it. Got it.
 
otoh I don't like it when others don't accept responsibility for their actions, which has been quite a common theme here with the 'but it's only a game!' crowd, which has a large overlap with the 'forum PvP is best PvP' crowd. I'm not in either set. Are you?
It bears repeating that Elite Dangerous is, in fact, only a game. Likely one of many in our respective Steam / Playstation / XBox / whatever libraries.

It's also worth noting that forum PVP is a lot of fun. Don't pull our legs and try to convince us you're not having a good time, you'd have disappeared long ago if this didn't engage you on some level that you find satisfactory.

But on the main theme - the "failure to accept responsibility for actions" - I mean, that's a subject that we've discussed at length. It really does boil down to the question of what players expect and anticipate when they play the game in Open.

What are reasonable expectations? What is "the good", in other words, to borrow from ethical discourse?

In a game that markets itself using statements about it presenting a "cutthroat galaxy" in which "you'll need combat skills to survive" and "be ready to stand your ground and fight," what are reasonable expectations of players? What is a reasonable "taking responsibility for your actions" in such a context?

These are very reasonable questions and they speak to the heart of the matter being discussed in this thread: The contrast between expectation and reality in Elite's Open mode.
 
One of them is the top scoring ganker in the game. Literally thousands of kills. Even if you did get the upper hand in a fight, the reality of Elite is that, once you have acquired a decent ship and a modicum of gank evasion skill, death becomes completely optional. Meaning either of these pilots would likely high wake on you if the fight turned against them.

Which, of course, means that you'd have won.

Oh, and yes: naming and shaming is against the rules, so you should probably edit that.

OK then, I guess I will have to learn a bit, to mop the floor with both of them at once...

And just to set the record straight, I was naming (almost, I did not disclose the full names), but not shaming, that I believe was obvious from my posts, that I did not take any offence in them griefing me and that I actually did accept the challenge... :)
 
I find these kind of brainwashing threads to be an annoying waste of time, it is like I am talking to a bunch of people trying desperately to justify their mis-deeds instead of just owning it.

While complaining that Spear are trying desperately to justify their own mis-deeds instead of just owning it. Except I'm not really seeing any desparation from Spear, they do appear to be just owning it.
 
While complaining that Spear are trying desperately to justify their own mis-deeds instead of just owning it. Except I'm not really seeing any desparation from Spear, they do appear to be just owning it.
Who's baiting who?

(Sung in the voice of Aretha Franklin)
 
So you are specifically targeting an individual or group and calling them out because they specifically call out individuals or groups?

Gotcha.

ETA this whole thread has just been trying to bait Spear members, hasn't it? Just trolling for bait.
We were, if I recall, having a discussion about the various postures - let's call them that - that various groups have taken in-game.

I was replying to a comment made describing how some lawful groups choose to use the same tactics that outlaws use, but somehow feel they are different, because they're "good guys." I think i did a good job of illustrating with examples.

Which is itself providing a concrete example of a specific topic of discussion, as opposed to speaking in generalities. Not the same thing as targeting another group or individual, just providing an example to illustrate a statement.

This whole thread has not been about trolling. I've made that clear from the beginning, and I'm apparently required to reiterate that truth every few pages, for some reason.

If you are feeling trolled, I unfortunately do not accept responsibility. That is your own doing.
 
And just to set the record straight, I was naming (almost, I did not disclose the full names), but not shaming, that I believe was obvious from my posts, that I did not take any offence in them griefing me and that I actually did accept the challenge... :)
Totally not a problem! It's just the forum moderators come down on folks, we were honestly trying to look out for you. I am sure the individuals in question are completely OK with their notoriety levels both in-game and in-forum :D
 
Back
Top Bottom