So to me weapon needs to be functional, and well I KNOW what weapon needs to have to be functional.
Game Discussions Star Citizen Discussion Thread v12
- Thread starter Yaffle
- Start date
-
- Tags
- star citizen
As the Space Cowboy I am more interested in firing from the hip, no need for sights, just a decent rifling of the barrel and a hair trigger, I think I will pass for my Colt 45.Hobby shooter here tooWell if one draws straight line from front side blade to rear sights they may about just align. Not very good I say.
Even that non-firearm gun, say laser/phaser/blaster and so on stuff need to be ergonomic and follow certain design philosophies. You will need it to be one you can aim and carry. And be reasonable safe against unintended discharge. So some kind of shielded trigger. I once remembered reading stuff in certain Asimov's fiction of blaster havin thumb trigger. Good luck making it safe against unintended discharge....real weapons have trigger guard for good reasons. And forefinger trigger is ambidextrous...
Last edited:
dayrth
Volunteer Moderator
I thought SC was all about fidelity.
ok, sure.
so why do you thing you would not be able to line up the front and rear sights?
So, perhaps changing your first glance from a useful angle of view before judging ?
need to join the sc leaks discord if you want to stay on top of things
Woo, the UI pipelines are open
Fair play. Better than another deck that’s just a lump of assets.
need to join the sc leaks discord if you want to stay on top of things
That looks interesting. I take it that its interactable with and needs to be managed to yield best returns?
Interesting would be a remarkably strong word for it. (It seems to be minor busywork tinkering combined with long needless waits for the most part). But YMMV.
Last edited:
<troll> heh. Looks like the mods are counting sheep on this one. <br /> 'cording to the poster above me, the number of posts is 3,201 above the officially unofficial 10k post limit. </troll>
Forums got improved we have no idea how high the current max is so its possible that we r stuck with the V12 for a while longer
OK top ejecting, right handed people only, why those heavy side panels? Those side panels will prevent spent case going anywhery but straight back towards shooter. Bolt seems to be rotating one, otherwise it will not cycle. So gas operated as I can not see how it could be recoil operated. Where is gas piston located, or is it by direct impingement. Though upper part seems to me that atleast on left side there is no cut that would allow bolt to rotate, maybe on right side. What that ridge on back part of bolt does anyways?ok, sure.
so why do you thing you would not be able to line up the front and rear sights?
Last edited:
The weapon looks about as dangerous as a flintlock pistol... but only to the person firing it...
I love seeing conceptual designs of firearms done by graphic artists who should have stuck to designing Pico plushies and seat cushions
Last edited:
Yep, top ejecting. That is why the 1894 Winchester has such a bad reputation in the firearms community.
Look at this, it is awful
See towards where it ejects. Now add side panel and think can it eject that way
And if there is no cut in left side of weapon that bolt is not going to cycle. Because of that odd ridge without any use on rear part of bolt
It looks like locking lug, but it does not lock against anything.
Well proper flintlock pistol is pretty dangerous, it can kill one pretty dead even today. Humans usually do not like of getting hit with balls of lead flying at high speeds. It is kind of funny misconception. Obsolete weapon being not dangerous....The weapon looks about as dangerous as a flintlock pistol... but only to the person firing it...
I love seeing conceptual designs of firearms done by graphic artists who should have stuck to designing Pico plushies and seat cushions