PSA - THIS is why AX Pilots ALWAYS use gauss cannons

i maybe should have been clearer - scout only instances are fine - threat 3-4 -great

the fake interceptor signal sources though - they just suck :p

So true. A veritable cloud of Scouts isn't fun.

Like when you land a Plasma Charger shot the visual effect is really cool ☺️

I think they would either need greater damage to account for their difficulty of landing shots or the projectile hitbox should be made larger to make them more forgiving to aim

Plasma Chargers definitely need far better armor piercing. Maybe better damage? I haven't run the numbers. Basilisks are no issue for me with Plasma Chargers, but they also don't have the armor of the higher Interceptors.

I don't think they need bigger hitboxes though. If you can't land plasma on a frigging interceptor, which is literally the easiest target profile possible, it's not the weapon that is at fault.
 
well we will have to agree to disagree - i tihnk that's reasonable right? :)

Not sure what we're going to agree about disagreeing, but yea, it could be reasonable enough :)

if it's about Gauses, yea, they are mandatory when soloing medusas and hydras, but not when Cyclopsing
And since you know that better than me, the title is a click bait

if it's about monetizing stuff but not carrying about money, meh.
especially when you start the title with PSA and link a monetized channel


A public service announcement (PSA) is a message in the public interest disseminated without charge
 
you have to concentrate on the lead indicator adding to mental load and each suffer from either lower damage or poor rate of fire
When the lead indicator actually works and is not jumping all over the place ......

and not to be completely offtopic, my gauss chally agrees with the title, while my shard conda is throwing a superior and dismissive look at the said chally
Why pick one or the other when you can have the best of two worlds? Unsolicited unmonetized video plug: :p

Oh ... and double shot incendiary frag cannons ...
 
People do read books.

Reading is a fine skill to have, name a film that was better than the book.

Reading increases intelligence, if only in the art of learning new words. It provokes more thought, requires more imagination and increases the reader's ability to critically think.

Reading anything requires the reader to participate, watching a film (not all but most) is just being spoon fed something.

I know. I read books. I've played DnD since 2nd Edition, and read plenty of novels. My point is most people don't. People watch movies nowadays, or get their information from YouTube. I think reading is better too, but sometimes movie adaptations are good, and sometimes YouTube vids are more informative than forum posts.

And I can name a movie better than the book. The Shining. Kubrick over Stephen King all day.
 
I know. I read books. I've played DnD since 2nd Edition, and read plenty of novels. My point is most people don't. People watch movies nowadays

This was fairy easy to debunk. Book publishing revenues have gone up steadily. To say nothing of the explosion of Kindle/Ebooks etc etc.


Not sure what's with the old man "get off my lawn darn video kids!" attitudes here, but people are reading just as much - if not more - these days.
 
Back
Top Bottom