I wasnt able to find the actual time stamp and statement quoted in this new Quaver´s post, any ideas?
Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/starcitizen_refunds/comments/mq167s/now_that_the_new_ocs_and_physics_techs_are_in/
Looks like he's got the source wrong, as the photo is from the infamous "I absolve myself" episode.Had a quick spin through that transcript and can't find that exact quote, agreed. He does discuss some of those elements here and here, but doesn't come to the 200 player conclusion that I can see.
There's this previous one in there:
Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/starcitizen_refunds/comments/lwue3d/cig_can_easily_make_a_battlefieldclone_but_better/
And I can stand up this similar Sean Tracy one pretty much:
Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/starcitizen_refunds/comments/m96en7/200player_battles_of_the_highest_fidelity_with/
Ultimately it's not like they haven't made comparable claims though:
Erin Roberts (June, 2018)
But yeah, could do with hotlinks on these Quavers posts. And they maybe paraphrase a bit too much just to fit the format sometimes. Do like them, and they're generally spot on, but that quote is tough to place.
---
Did find these bits though while scanning through
Agony, looks like your base ownership bet is back on
Pay to Wander Around Corridors Less![]()
At 44m28s mark the youtube transcript has:
we'll be able to you know so I think what will happen is with the object container streaming and they're moving so batch model of physics we'll be able to get the player count in any one server to at least 200 or so and then the server meshing will allow us to go quite a bit beyond that in terms of people in areas or instances