It’s a running joke, does that count?
Last we heard it was supposed to enter closed beta in Q2 (then Q3) 2020…
Game Discussions Star Citizen Discussion Thread v12
- Thread starter Yaffle
- Start date
-
- Tags
- star citizen
It’s a running joke, does that count?
Last we heard it was supposed to enter closed beta in Q2 (then Q3) 2020…
That is a pretty shoddy practice to be honest.SA says this. Is it true?
It will be the Answer to
What? You didn't answer the call in 2014?
I wouldn't worry, it was almost completely finished and was going to be released in 2016. What more needs to be done except a little polish here and there?
...
They first said it was almost finished in 2014. With SC not far behind.
I was all in when I heard the was going to be a new freelancer type game than all this happened lol. forgot all about it till some ask me about sc the other day lol
I heard if a game takes longer than 2-3 years to deliver it becomes stale. Can't quite remember who said that.
Anyway, over on Spectrum...
Found @Bottom Hat 's spiritual brother
robertsspaceindustries.com
And i wasn't sure if any backer would raise the topic of auto-accepting EULAs, or if Nightrider or someone else wouldn't lock it down immediately.
But its there, at least for the moment
robertsspaceindustries.com
They are saying its not the EULA though but simply an ITS ALPHA disclaimer.
Can someone confirm?
I mean, if the box you press says something like "I agree" or "I accept" then it certainly sounds like its some sort of contract/agreement that you are being asked to acknowledge/confirm.
Anyway, over on Spectrum...
Found @Bottom Hat 's spiritual brother
Spectrum - v7.46.3
RSI’s Spectrum is our integrated community and player interaction service, including chat, forums, game integration, and Player Organization facilities. Player Organizations (“Org”...
robertsspaceindustries.com
And i wasn't sure if any backer would raise the topic of auto-accepting EULAs, or if Nightrider or someone else wouldn't lock it down immediately.
But its there, at least for the moment
Launcher v1.4.11 EULA Timer - Star Citizen Spectrum
After the launcher updated to the captioned version yesterday I got one of those EULA pop-ups that we've been geeting as of late. While still reading and scrolling, I noticed the countdown timer...
robertsspaceindustries.com
They are saying its not the EULA though but simply an ITS ALPHA disclaimer.
Can someone confirm?
I mean, if the box you press says something like "I agree" or "I accept" then it certainly sounds like its some sort of contract/agreement that you are being asked to acknowledge/confirm.
I heard if a game takes longer than 2-3 years to deliver it becomes stale. Can't quite remember who said that.
Anyway, over on Spectrum...
Found @Bottom Hat 's spiritual brother
Spectrum - v7.46.3
RSI’s Spectrum is our integrated community and player interaction service, including chat, forums, game integration, and Player Organization facilities. Player Organizations (“Org”...
And i wasn't sure if any backer would raise the topic of auto-accepting EULAs, or if Nightrider or someone else wouldn't lock it down immediately.
But its there, at least for the moment
Launcher v1.4.11 EULA Timer - Star Citizen Spectrum
After the launcher updated to the captioned version yesterday I got one of those EULA pop-ups that we've been geeting as of late. While still reading and scrolling, I noticed the countdown timer...
They are saying its not the EULA though but simply an ITS ALPHA disclaimer.
Can someone confirm?
I mean, if the box you press says something like "I agree" or "I accept" then it certainly sounds like its some sort of contract/agreement that you are being asked to acknowledge/confirm.
Hahahaha! You cheeky swine
Aye, they can't get the Ai station defenses to actually hit anything that's flying so rather than fix a complicated thing like broken Ai targeting or do the sensible thing and reinstate the no-fire zones, they've decided to fit everyone in hangars so the torpedo spammers can fire straight through the open doors to kill us rather than just blow us up on the pads
Last edited:
At least they are consistent in not fixing broken game mechanics.Aye, they can't get the Ai station defenses to actually hit anything that's flying so rather than fix a complicated thing like broken Ai targeting or do the sensible thing and reinstate the no-fire zones, they've decided to fit everyone in hangars so the torpedo spammers can fire straight through the open doors to kill us rather than just blow us up on the pads
Re-instating the No-Fire Zone would surely have been the more sensible option, any Idea why they are opposed to doing that?
Surely, that is a contradiction.
By removing the pads because the Station AI defences are not working and ships are getting blown up due to free fire, they are not allowing the consequences at any place. They are making changes to the environment to avoid scenarios impacted by broken game mechanics.
As we are regularly informed , the game is still in Alpha and bugs are to be expected. They should leave it as is and fix the Station AI Defences.
But there are not consequences with the new situation, since ships will drop into hangars and therefore no reason for anyone to fire because there is nothing to fire at.
I'm not sure why CIG wouldn't want stations (or at least certain stations) to be safe spaces anyway. Let the space between stations and bases be wild and dangerous.
Because @sovapid