They do say that everything from the concept sale like stats and all is subject to change
Pay no attention to what we said when we sold you the ship. That was years ago anyway. You can't hold us accountable for things we said years ago. We said things could change. PS: Buy this new ship, it will definitely be like we say it will be and we definitely won't change it in the future, unless we do, but then we did tell you things could change.
Pledge now.
As many flaws the game has, that subreddit is always very hilarious to look into. Their quotes album seriously borders on being unhealthily obsessed with the whole project. And then the open calls of support of sending Roberts to Prison. It's interesting to say the least.In other news, refunds sub has just reached 12,000 subscribers.
12,000 FUDsters who don't understand AAAAAAA fidelity development.
Time to celebrate!
I don’t think my view is uninformed at all but I do honestly think your view about elite’s exploration is quite narrow indeed, and probably ignores a big chunk of that gameplay. Guess we can at least agree to disagree.
Yeah, he was lying. They probably "wanted" to get the game out in that timeframe but horrendous mismanagement ensued.Ok, so you've seen the quotes and say they are bordering on unhealthy, a comment about Q&W who makes the quotes album rather than a comment on their contents. I normally say at this point "Typical faithful, disparaging a person who is being critical rather than addressing the criticism itself"
So, how about instead of doing that, why not address the criticism?
For example, allow me to bring up my personal favourite.
What does that say to you?
1) CR knew it was a load of tosh and deliberately lied to backers?
2) CR didn't know, meaning he had no idea about the true state of the project and is therefore woefully incompetent at his job?
3) Something else?
Please do not bring up the vote and the scope change (sorry to preempt you, but its a pretty common response). The vote was a crock of manure and we could go into that, but suffice to say, the vote took place long before CR said this. And he said orignally pledged for, so it doesn't even cover the expanded scope that they started adding from 2015 onwards. He's either talking about the 5.5 million funding goal (at an absoloute strech) or the 65 million funding goal (possibly), and here we are, in 2021, and backers still don't have the games they pledged for at 5.5 million. SQ42 is still MIA and SC is still nothing like the game promised for 5.5 million.
Because the liar's and fraud's apologists want you to forget about it. Whataboutism is to wash out and blur what is acceptable and not.Ok, so you've seen the quotes and say they are bordering on unhealthy, a comment about Q&W who makes the quotes album rather than a comment on their contents. I normally say at this point "Typical faithful, disparaging a person who is being critical rather than addressing the criticism itself"
So, how about instead of doing that, why not address the criticism?
For example, allow me to bring up my personal favourite.
What does that say to you?
1) CR knew it was a load of tosh and deliberately lied to backers?
2) CR didn't know, meaning he had no idea about the true state of the project and is therefore woefully incompetent at his job?
3) Something else?
Please do not bring up the vote and the scope change (sorry to preempt you, but its a pretty common response). The vote was a crock of manure and we could go into that, but suffice to say, the vote took place long before CR said this. And he said orignally pledged for, so it doesn't even cover the expanded scope that they started adding from 2015 onwards. He's either talking about the 5.5 million funding goal (at an absoloute strech) or the 65 million funding goal (possibly), and here we are, in 2021, and backers still don't have the games they pledged for at 5.5 million. SQ42 is still MIA and SC is still nothing like the game promised for 5.5 million.
I mean, what sense has it pandering on about a statment that was made 6 years ago? Yeah, he lied. It is what it is, the game we have now is what we have now.
So if that was the case then (to paraphrase another long-time backer who is also critical of the project) what makes you think Lucy is going to let Charlie Brown kick the football this time? Or the next? The album of quotes is full of such examples, yet the unhealthy ones are the backers (former and current) in that sub who are attempting accountability, (edit) as opposed to the ones who are hanging on based on faith and Einstein's definition of insanity.
when did they add the third crew member for the Keelback?At the risk of breaking forum rules, I am taking pre-orders for my ship being designed for when the modding toolset is delivered.
It boxes above it's weight...
Is this going to end up like the Khartu-Al and wind up holding only one egg despite having multiple seats?At the risk of breaking forum rules, I am taking pre-orders for my ship being designed for when the modding toolset is delivered.
It boxes above it's weight...
He's right though
Pay no attention to what we said when we sold you the ship. That was years ago anyway. You can't hold us accountable for things we said years ago. We said things could change. PS: Buy this new ship, it will definitely be like we say it will be and we definitely won't change it in the future, unless we do, but then we did tell you things could change.
Pledge now.
Yeah alright he lied and took in $400 million on the back of those lies but so what?To warn people who might otherwise fall for the latest lie...
It's not like he's stopped talking outlandish nonsense to sell the game.
Recent case in point
But there's loads more. As the giant list of images on the refunds sub testifies
What? I'm doing it wrong then. Mostly I see M-class dwarfs with some uninteresting ice-balls.To be honest, i'm a bit of an exploration "gatekeeper" in ED. When people say they are exploring by running around the galaxy in 70LY range ships just to go to Beagle Point or some nebula i tell them they are not exploring. I tell them they are sightseeing. I say explorers seek out sights nobody else has seen, try and make discoveries.
Actually, basically what you said matches what i consider to be exploration
So i do gatekeep, but you get to pass the gate
Pointing out that the idiot Roberts is actually an idiot doesn't countOk, so you've seen the quotes and say they are bordering on unhealthy, a comment about Q&W who makes the quotes album rather than a comment on their contents. I normally say at this point "Typical faithful, disparaging a person who is being critical rather than addressing the criticism itself"
So, how about instead of doing that, why not address the criticism?
For example, allow me to bring up my personal favourite.
What does that say to you?
1) CR knew it was a load of tosh and deliberately lied to backers?
2) CR didn't know, meaning he had no idea about the true state of the project and is therefore woefully incompetent at his job?
3) Something else?
Please do not bring up the vote and the scope change (sorry to preempt you, but its a pretty common response). The vote was a crock of manure and we could go into that, but suffice to say, the vote took place long before CR said this. And he said orignally pledged for, so it doesn't even cover the expanded scope that they started adding from 2015 onwards. He's either talking about the 5.5 million funding goal (at an absoloute strech) or the 65 million funding goal (possibly), and here we are, in 2021, and backers still don't have the games they pledged for at 5.5 million. SQ42 is still MIA and SC is still nothing like the game promised for 5.5 million.
I never said "Its because you don't have" but "check your pagefile". If it's OK, it's the game fault. If not, modify it.
I never said that the game is not at fault. But before saying the game is at fault, he must check his pagefile. Nothing more. Computer have history and some misconfigurations can occur without even the owner knowing something is misconfigured.
