Panther LX

bangermsuk

bangermsuk
it fake, it probably a model grab from elite dangerous and hack on the server. it too basic to be a realistic EDH model that not been worked on by Fdevs.

they use to do that on Call of duty. with the submarine hack only with that one it was to directly to crash a private server.
 

Darth Ender

D
Arioch said:
Really? I thought I was the one wanting the Panther to remain a docking slot capable ship 🤪
Click to expand...

You are, but your leverage of using what existed in previous games is worthless because you're admittedly knit picking only particular things from them to actually care about. So they're (older versions of elite) effectively irrelevant as a basis for suggesting it should be a certain way.
 

Arioch

Arioch
Darth Ender said:
You are, but your leverage of using what existed in previous games is worthless because you're admittedly knit picking only particular things from them to actually care about. So they're (older versions of elite) effectively irrelevant as a basis for suggesting it should be a certain way.
Click to expand...
Aye, haha alright then. Enjoy the rest of your Friday o7
 

sinkarma

S
Lots of mysterious things lie in the depths of the game. Like raxxla...
Lets just hope the haxors don't spawn raxxla in or something as ridiculously spoilery.
 

Adel

A
sinkarma said:
Lots of mysterious things lie in the depths of the game. Like raxxla...
Lets just hope the haxors don't spawn raxxla in or something as ridiculously spoilery.
Click to expand...
Don't worry, they cannot spawn server-side elements.
It the Raxxla's thread "The Quest To Find Raxxla", someone pointed a good thought: as noone found until now (if you consider it's accessible), maybe we need some conditions that triggers an event server-side (not client-side) and then spawn Raxxla.
For example: megaships like hauler-class are spawned server-side.
 

Chorda

Chorda
sinkarma said:
Lots of mysterious things lie in the depths of the game. Like raxxla...
Lets just hope the haxors don't spawn raxxla in or something as ridiculously spoilery.
Click to expand...
Just think, Raxla is just one hack away from becoming a youtube video of a giant, spinning, untextured marshmallow. To be fair though, I reckon Fdev's claims about Raxla are of the same order as those of Lost's scriptwriters. "Yes, we definitely know where this is all headed. No timetravel, definitely no writer escapes or purgatory themes coming either..."
 

CMDR Yates

C
EXE Sas ser said:
Oooo... Though from the T10-s perspective it looks Hella smaller
Click to expand...

Rubbernuke said:
Its hard to really say though- unless one parked on top of the other. All we have is a cockpit view on an untextured ship with no frames of reference.
Click to expand...

Yeah, it's not smaller, it just looks that way in some of the videos. Maybe something not do with it being such a low detail model and lack of nearby points of reference.

I saw a video where someone flew a T9 right up to one, and the Panther LX was approximately the same width and about 30-50% longer.
 

Northpin

Northpin
sinkarma said:
I remember a datamined snippet somewhere saying it will have
3x size 8 internals
1x size 7 internal
1x size 5 internal
1x size 4 internal
2x size 1 internal
Click to expand...

If so, i'm glad it's not in the Game.
IMO the Panther Clipper needs at least 1200t cargo space, preferably 1340t (that would be the ratio cargo value between Conda and Cutter applied to Cutter to Panther)
948t (no shields) vs 794t ... Does not really Cut it, if i may say so
 

sinkarma

S
Northpin said:
If so, i'm glad it's not in the Game.
IMO the Panther Clipper needs at least 1200t cargo space, preferably 1340t (that would be the ratio cargo value between Conda and Cutter applied to Cutter to Panther)
948t (no shields) vs 794t ... Does not really Cut it, if i may say so
Click to expand...
Ya no I'd like it to have 1 more size 8 slot or 2 more size 7 slots
That way it will be the panther clipper of legend
That that or give it a special fighter bay that can dock a sidewinder
That that that or give it turreted huge plasma accelerators.
That that that that or just let us have the puwunther cuwupper puwuease
 

Northpin

Northpin
sinkarma said:
Ya no I'd like it to have 1 more size 8 slot or 2 more size 7 slots
That way it will be the panther clipper of legend
That that or give it a special fighter bay that can dock a sidewinder
That that that or give it turreted huge plasma accelerators.
That that that that or just let us have the puwunther cuwupper puwuease
Click to expand...

Going along with my own idea of 1340t:
4x Size 8
1x Size 7
3x Size 6
1x Size 4
2x Size 1

That would be it. 11 Slots. 1364t max cargo, no shields. But probably the size 7 would be the Shield slot, meaning 1236 Cargo, shields but no flight assists.
Eventually it should have 1-2 size 5 military Slots

Edit: damn maths...
 
Last edited:

Zieman

Zieman
Rubbernuke said:
The P Clipper needs to be faster than the T-9 but haul much more than the Cutter with a few module slots for some toys.
Click to expand...
Being slower & more cumbersome than T9 would carry on the FE2 / FFE legacy perfect, but clipper as part of the name implies some speed & agility.
buttons_small.jpg
 

Rubbernuke

Rubbernuke
Zieman said:
Being slower & more cumbersome than T9 would carry on the FE2 / FFE legacy perfect, but clipper as part of the name implies some speed & agility.
View attachment 291457
Click to expand...
The problem is the T-9 is as low as agility can really go before it becomes a literal brick. There is a space for something faster that hauls more than the Cutter though- right now the Cutter is the go to ship due to its speed and tankiness- not to mention its offensive capability.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom