Allow me to quote myself:
"If you think there is a solid business case for FDEV to continue expending resources on EDO then please state it. Please explain how they are going to get a return on that investment when nothing they have done so far has moved the needle on revenue."
I didn't say EDO was still in development, I said Elite was still in development. Which is what you said:
No, you can put a fork in Elite -- it's done.
And what I was responding to. What Frontier add to Odyssey vs. Elite are two separate discussions. Maybe you could stick to the one subject at hand?
Also, can you cite your source to your claim that the needle hasn't moved please?
I think otherwise and I'm basing that on decades of experience as a software developer.
Good for you, I have decades of experience in my field, and 14 years of that as a sole proprietor/independent contractor. I've seen enough to know that is frankly meaningless when it comes to judging what the management of any particular company is going to do in any given situation, especially one with over 500 employees. Being good/great/etc at your job as an employee doesn't equate to knowledge of how to run the business that employs you, let alone any other business within that sector.
You seem to be basing your opinion largely on wishful thinking.
You attributed space-legs in Elite to aping Star Citizen and didn't know that space legs were part of the original development plan, which is pretty common knowledge for those whose familiarity with Elite that goes further back than a year or two, which suggests that your knowledge on the subject isn't enough to label any counter to your anecdotal appeal to authority as 'wishful thinking'. I don't doubt your experience as a software developer but that doesn't give one magic eyes to be able to know what a completely separate company is going to do, especially when your research on the subject at hand, ie; Elite, is so obviously lacking.
So far Frontier's actions seem much more in line with my view than yours. But they have a company to run and wishful thinking doesn't get you very far in business.
And my view is what exactly, according to you?
Again, if you have a solid business case for Frontier to continue to expending resources on a failed product then please enlighten us all.
What am I putting a solid business case forth for? To counter your What kind of absurdity are you talking about, or are we doing the whole 'set the time commitment to answer bar unreasonably high' debate tactic where if the other person doesn't fetch like a good boy then you can claim you are right by default? As if this isn't that already, and obviously, I'm sure you're keen to listen and take in such opposing viewpoints and aren't just trolling, like I already said I believe you are.
Like I said before, your initial assertion was based on a biased leading question (why should Frontier continue to flush money down the Odyssey toilet), assumption, and lack of knowledge of the subject you are passing judgment on.
Unless you work at Frontier in a capacity to know what their plans are then both of us know absolute zip about what will happen for sure. It's all pure conjecture which you present as expert analysis. I mean, I could say I called the console cancellation, but really I didn't, I just said that their decision would be based on cost/resource vs ROI, taking into account the EOL status of the last generation of consoles and also whether those resources would be better put to the overall development Elite, plus other factors. If that equation worked out to continue development on console it would, if it didn't, then they would cancel it. Evidently it didn't, it's not exactly a genius take, though of course I left out the whole FDev bad angle, which I guess for some is the easier explanation, and therefore
according to Occam's Razor must logically be the explanation.
I believe the same criteria goes for the overall development of Elite, however it is further informed by a statement from the CEO of the company that said they were committed to the long-term development of Elite and the decision to cancel console development was taken to focus on that commitment. Is this the 'wishful thinking' you were talking about? I guess you can argue that David Braben is lying, or that he is engaging in wishful thinking?
FDEV probably thinks they have lost enough money on EDO between the original development costs and their largely unsuccessful attempts to fix the mess they ended up with.
Unsuccessful in what way? All ways, or some, or none?
Future sales prospects are limited at best due the terrible reviews and toxic reputation it has. They'll never see a profit on it and will consider themselves lucky to cut their losses.
They're going to try to complete the story line with what they've got. Console players and PC players who can't afford the expensive hardware needed to get half-decent performance are just out of luck.
So basically, doom and more doom. Why are you bothering with any of this btw, as in, what do you hope to achieve?