So, the Amur leopard has a clear lead on the meta-wishlist, even moreso if you count the 'indifferent' votes towards it. There's good reason for this - it's the most endangered subspecies, and it's also the most common in AZA and EAZA accredited zoos. Odds are, if we get a leopard it will be the Amur leopard.
A lot of people also want the African leopard, which is extremely rare in captivity, but is more widely known about because of the countless nature documentaries about Africa.
What I'm wondering is, if they just gave us a 'Leopard' in the same way they gave us the 'Cougar', with all the associated biomes linked to it and the total range included, would people be okay with that? There are defined morphological differences between the various subspecies, yes, much moreso than the cougar, but in the interest of balance, would it be the worst idea? I mean, they gave us a generic wolf despite the morphological differences between subspecies there (granted we also got the Arctic wolf later, but still).
A lot of people also want the African leopard, which is extremely rare in captivity, but is more widely known about because of the countless nature documentaries about Africa.
What I'm wondering is, if they just gave us a 'Leopard' in the same way they gave us the 'Cougar', with all the associated biomes linked to it and the total range included, would people be okay with that? There are defined morphological differences between the various subspecies, yes, much moreso than the cougar, but in the interest of balance, would it be the worst idea? I mean, they gave us a generic wolf despite the morphological differences between subspecies there (granted we also got the Arctic wolf later, but still).