When I say they are unreasonable I mean simply that they can not be reasoned with.
We haven't tried. We are in their territory, taking their technology and meta-alloys. What would be the reasonable response, to just let us carry on doing it? Again, if the roles were reversed, and suddenly there were Thargoid convoys coming into the bubble to take our stuff, building infrastructure around us... what would be the "reasonable" response?
Did the Guardians steal their precious meta alloy? Nope they just got jumped.
Incorrect. It is much the same situation as ours: the Guardians occupied the worlds with barnacles.
You say they are reactive only and it's a fairy tale. Just drop into a signal source with scouts. You will get jumped.
Scouts are a reaction to the escalation of hostilities. If you declare war on someone, and then shoot at them a bunch, you can't point to their counterattack and say "look at how aggressive they're being! They didn't even check if our guys in the warzone were friendly or not!". I mean, if an Interceptor shows up at an AX CZ, do you expect people to hang around and wait to see what their intention is?
Scouts first appeared on April 27th, 3304. This is five months after Aegis's first massacre operation against the Thargoids, to pick one random example. After being shot at for five months, they deployed war drones. Sounds reasonable to me, at the minimum.
Also what with all the people saying they are showing great restraint? Wr nearly ended their species before. We kill them in job lots now. Why do people think the goids are capable of seriously damaging human civilization?
1) Outside of warzones, their conduct is unchanged. If you're not a threat, they leave you alone. If you've taken their stuff, they give you a grace period to drop it, and then they leave you alone. A grace period! They could decide that humanity has made itself a collective threat and simply open fire regardless - they have ample opportunity to, with the ability to temporarily disable ships. But they don't. Why? Does this behaviour not conflict with the ancient Guardian account?
2) The station attacks. There's a whole list of things contributing to these, but even after all the events of the last few years, they only disable the stations. The death toll as a result is markedly low, especially when compared to the NMLA attacks that use the exact same damage model. They
could tear the entire station to shreds, we're helpless to stop them once they get going. But they don't.
Here's the GalNet from the very first station attacks.
Footage from starport security feeds indicate that the Thargoid ships used their shutdown fields to neutralise station defences before targeting the main reactor. One eyewitness said, “It’s like they wanted to cripple us rather than destroy us outright.”
They neutralize the immediate threat, then go for the cargo holds and retrieve what is theirs. And then they leave.
Here's the Gnosis.
They lured the Thargoids away while ejecting meta-alloys from their holds. The aliens were more interested in scooping up the meta-alloys than attacking us.
The station attacks, and the events leading up to them, are probably the most significant indicators of all of this. There's a pile of evidence to go through, if you'd like to - logs detailing how messing with Thargoid tech sends out a sort of distress signal, Aegis labs with that tech being the first to be targeted... and then the human-tech transmitters that replicated those signals to bring them to the bubble.
Is this not enough for some doubt that maybe there's more to this?