Game Discussions Star Citizen Discussion Thread v12

Viajero

Volunteer Moderator
Viajero
Navigare Necesse Est said:
Pardon
Ant has lost the plot. He could have made smug face with the server cap. Another bottle falls on his head and server meshing is already in.
Instead he celebrates some gonk stuff about lore loot.
Click to expand...
The reason is clear. As far as I can see Ant seems to be directly or indirectly linked to CIG (or has a vested interest otherwise). And CIG just posted that this 100 cap is not going to make it to live. Ant is probably therefore also fully aware.
 

LittleAnt

L
Viajero said:
The reason is clear. As far as I can see Ant seems to be directly or indirectly linked to CIG
Click to expand...
As far as I can see, you are wrong. I suspect you are linked to Derek Smart 🤔 On vacation, I spend less time here.

I'm a heavy roleplayer so seeing first lore items in game is good news for me and collecting them will be a new personnal goal.

The level cap to 100 is just a temp switch to test the network change on heavy load, nothing else. Without SM, I can't see CIG allowing more than 50 players in the PU. Or perhaps CIG has made more than network change in 3.17.2 but I don't think so, they haven't talked about it.
 
Last edited:

Navigare Necesse Est

Navigare Necesse Est
ED does have server meshing since initial release. Not that I think it makes the game any better - some stuff is just better in SP and the way ED is designed it would have been better designbed as SP game. SC repeats ED's mistakes, should the game ever become any stable and any capable in serious MP there will be just the same Hotel Californias open all the time.
 

VR Golgot

VR Golgot

Agony_Aunt

Agony_Aunt
VR Golgot said:
https://www.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/w2pyxv
Source: https://old.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/w2pyxv/how_far_has_star_citizen_come/

https://www.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/w2pyxv/_/igrhmn7
Source: https://old.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/w2pyxv/how_far_has_star_citizen_come/igrhmn7/

https://www.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/w2pyxv/_/igrhxkh
Source: https://old.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/w2pyxv/how_far_has_star_citizen_come/igrhxkh/
Click to expand...

Defenders of the faith to the rescue!

I mean, if you are falling through floors consistently it’s sounds like your storage device is not having the data streamed in fast enough, which is a you problem. Ssd or nvme/m2 is required
Click to expand...

Its a YOU problem, not a CIG problem.
 

ECity

ECity
Erin Roberts, four years ago:
...we’re at about 50. We’ll probably get up to about 100-odd once we get the unconstrained streaming stuff in later this year.
Click to expand...
Yesterday:
jake.png
 

Theodrid

Theodrid
LittleAnt said:
..... in game is good news for me.....
Click to expand...

When isn't it though Ant?

I can barely name a single occasion where you have come in here with any semblance of a balanced or even mildly critical statement.

Can barely name a time where you have been affected by the multitude of problems that CIG admit themselves to having, it's always 'betterer abd bettererer' .

You are allegedly in for the bare bones minimum package yet you defend CIG's honour at every single ****** turn like you would your bride to be.


And please don't come back at me with, 'waaaah, no balance from you lot either' because it's - for the most part - false. Look at Mole, in for the deposit on a house, yet he calls it as he sees it. Do I agree with Mole all the time? - hell no, if he wants to send CIG a message then going in large would seem to give them the 'everything's great with this commander' vibe as opposed to his critique here but I digress.

Ant, to be taken even remotely seriously you have to at least strive to have a morally believable, balanced and fair point of view.....you know, rather than putting on your CIG cheerleader outfit in every post and us all laughing at your pom-poms!

I'll go first, y'know, break the ice - Star Citizen can look truly awesome, some of the ship designs are great and it has the potential to be very immersive....your turn.

Sincerely.
 

LittleAnt

L
Theodrid said:
When isn't it though Ant?

I can barely name a single occasion where you have come in here with any semblance of a balanced or even mildly critical statement.
Click to expand...
I've explained it before. The vast majority of people here post all critical statements that can be possibly said about SC. Using the Mole card to call this forum balanced is nonsense. All is said about the negative aspects of SC, almost no positive posted. I criticise SC but not on this forum, I'm just here to add the positivity that almost all other poster here choose to dismiss.

Source: https://youtu.be/l7pdb4U0zjs


They choose to post almost only negative, I choose to post only positive. The day Golgot or AA post at least 5% of positive post, I will post some negative post about SC. But this day will never come, they are unable to do it.
 
Last edited:

PiLhEaD

PiLhEaD
LittleAnt said:
...I criticise SC but not on this forum...

They choose to post almost only negative, I choose to post only positive. The day Golgot or AA post at least 5% of positive post, I will post some negative post about SC. But this day will never come, they are unable to do it.
Click to expand...
Why not? What are you so afraid of in presenting the balanced view here that you claim to have elsewhere?

Can you not see that you devalue anything that you may want to share by claiming 'infinite patience' and rejecting or gainsaying the very many, highly obvious faults and doubts? It is all incredibly puerile stuff. To be fank, you read like a child.

I think SC looks very very pretty, and some of what they are attempting is ambitious. It's just that I look at the last ten years and Roberts' CV and have very serious doubts on very many levels about what's being and has been done.

I'm happy that you are perfectly happy with everything, just please don't try to claim some 'greater purpose' or moral high-ground. There's none to be had around here son.
 
Last edited:

LittleAnt

L
PiLhEaD said:
Why not? What are you so afraid of in presenting the balanced view here that you claim to have elsewhere?
Click to expand...
I'm not afraid. This forum is biased toward negativity, I present the bias in the opposite direction.
I'm not here to convince Golgot or AA or Xinx that SC have positive, it's impossible. The day SC will release, even if it's a huge success not one of those posters will acknowledge it. Why do you want a balanced view from me but not asking it also from AA or Golgot ?
 

EUS

EUS
LittleAnt said:
I've explained it before. The vast majority of people here post all critical statements that can be possibly said about SC. Using the Mole card to call this forum balanced is nonsense. All is said about the negative aspects of SC, almost no positive posted. I criticise SC but not on this forum, I'm just here to add the positivity that almost all other poster here choose to dismiss.




They choose to post almost only negative, I choose to post only positive. The day Golgot or AA post at least 5% of positive post, I will post some negative post about SC. But this day will never come, they are unable to do it.
Click to expand...
Well there it is in black and white, admitting to what I believed you were.
Goodbye.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom