Fleet Carriers … there hasn't been a new thread for a while

schlowi123

S
Fleet Carrier realism and cutural discourse

ED is dead, accodring to some pilots. However, certain other pilots use the advent of fleet carriers to denote not theory, as pretextual dialectic theory suggests, but posttheory. Thus, the meaninglessness, and therefore the failure, of the simulation of the galaxy, prevalent in the non-narrative of the game, is also evident in them, although in a more subtextual sense.

If one examines fleet carriers, one is faced with a choice: either accept dialectic postsemiotic theory or conclude that this game is fundamentally meaningless, but only if the premise of pretextual dialectic theory is valid; otherwise, they have intrinsic meaning. An abundance of discourses concerning fleet carriers may be revealed. However, pretextual dialectic theory holds that ED is capable of truth.

Try it for yourself.
I'm bored and I wanted to be featured in the fleet carriers thread thread. Thus I figured that it was time for a more serious discussion of this topic.
 

[PS4] Lorenzo Waringos

[PS4] Lorenzo Waringos
schlowi123 said:
Fleet Carrier realism and cutural discourse

ED is dead, accodring to some pilots. However, certain other pilots use the advent of fleet carriers to denote not theory, as pretextual dialectic theory suggests, but posttheory. Thus, the meaninglessness, and therefore the failure, of the simulation of the galaxy, prevalent in the non-narrative of the game, is also evident in them, although in a more subtextual sense.

If one examines fleet carriers, one is faced with a choice: either accept dialectic postsemiotic theory or conclude that this game is fundamentally meaningless, but only if the premise of pretextual dialectic theory is valid; otherwise, they have intrinsic meaning. An abundance of discourses concerning fleet carriers may be revealed. However, pretextual dialectic theory holds that ED is capable of truth.

Try it for yourself.
I'm bored and I wanted to be featured in the fleet carriers thread thread. Thus I figured that it was time for a more serious discussion of this topic.
Click to expand...

So you’re saying they should only be available in OPEN?
 

schlowi123

S
FrogsFriend said:
Hmmm... fascinating....could you elaborate on that?
Click to expand...
I can do that

A predominant concept is the distinction between fleet carriers of different type. An abundance of patriarchialisms concerning fleet carriers may be revealed. Thus, certain pilots promote the use of dialectic subtextual theory to deconstruct the status quo.

The subject is interpolated into a fleet carrier that includes truth as a totality. Thus, a number of narratives concerning a mythopoetical whole exists.

From that point I think you should participate in the discussion.

XloubellXX said:
So you’re saying they should only be available in OPEN?
Click to expand...
No, this is exactly what I mean.

Wolf Starslayer said:
Perhaps some sort of countdown should be implemented but only in Solo ?
Click to expand...
Yes, only in Solo, Private Player Groups and Open. But not in Open, Private Player Groups or Solo.

I see, we are getting somewhere.
 

Phongsalt

Phongsalt
Something like this?
morrismen.jpg
 

schlowi123

S
DrewCarnegie said:
I would have liked this thread, but thus far nobody has used the word 'juxtaposition'.

My contined interaction with the conceptualization of this dialogue is predicated upon urgent rectification of this unconscionable oversight.
Click to expand...
In a sense, fleet carriers promote the use of deconstructive subcapitalist theory to deconstruct archaic perceptions of class. The premise of juxtaposition obscurity suggests that the raison d’etre of the pilot is significant form.

Phongsalt said:
Something like this?
Click to expand...
Being aware of the truth behind words like Yes and No I state a clear Jnoin. Which should answer this question sufficiently.
 

z993126

z993126
The following letter is inspired by a quote from Thomas Paine: “He who dares not offend cannot be honest.” Some background is in order: For the nonce, the manufacturer of fleet carriers is content to impose swinish new restrictions on society just to satisfy some sort of yawping drive for power. But in a matter of days, it will interfere with the most important principles of democracy. Regardless of the theoretical beauty of the notion that the manufacturer of fleet carriers's claims are palpably disaffected, there is the opposing fact that the gloss that the manufacturer of fleet carriers's representatives put on the manufacturer of fleet carriers's shell games unfortunately does little to investigate the real story behind its calumnies. We must search for the truth, find the facts, and convey the message that when the manufacturer of fleet carriers's vainglorious utterances are translated into plain, words-mean-things English, it appears to be saying that it has answers to everything. For me, this smarmy, parviscient moonshine serves only to emphasize how Nature is a wonderful teacher. For instance, the lesson that Nature teaches us from newly acephalous poultry is that you really don't need a brain to run around like a dang fool making a spectacle of yourself. Nature also teaches us that the manufacturer of fleet carriers uses highfalutin terms like “magnetohydrodynamics” and “tetraiodophenolphthalein” to conceal its plans to impose ideology, control thought, and punish virtually any behavior it disapproves of. In this scheme of its, a mass of grandiloquent words falls upon the facts like soft snow, blurring the outlines and covering up all the details. We become unable to see that if I had my druthers, the manufacturer of fleet carriers would never have had the opportunity to keep us perennially behind the eight ball. As it stands, the manufacturer of fleet carriers attracts the most ill-natured luftmenschen you'll ever see to its crime syndicate by telling them that it's soporific to promote productive, meaningful dialogue and mutual understanding. I suppose the people to whom it tells such things just want to believe lies that make them feel intellectually and spiritually superior to others. Whether or not that's the case, the manufacturer of fleet carriers makes it sound like we should avoid personal responsibility. The evidence against that concept is so overwhelming, even an eight-year-old child can recognize it. Even so, it is not uncommon for the manufacturer of fleet carriers to victimize the innocent, penalize the victim for making any effort to defend himself, and then paint the whole hotheaded affair as some great benefit to humanity. So, sorry for being so long-winded in this letter, but the manufacturer of fleet carriers's in late-stage addiction to quislingism.
 

Speedcuffs

Speedcuffs
z993126 said:
The following letter is inspired by a quote from Thomas Paine: “He who dares not offend cannot be honest.” Some background is in order: For the nonce, the manufacturer of fleet carriers is content to impose swinish new restrictions on society just to satisfy some sort of yawping drive for power. But in a matter of days, it will interfere with the most important principles of democracy. Regardless of the theoretical beauty of the notion that the manufacturer of fleet carriers's claims are palpably disaffected, there is the opposing fact that the gloss that the manufacturer of fleet carriers's representatives put on the manufacturer of fleet carriers's shell games unfortunately does little to investigate the real story behind its calumnies. We must search for the truth, find the facts, and convey the message that when the manufacturer of fleet carriers's vainglorious utterances are translated into plain, words-mean-things English, it appears to be saying that it has answers to everything. For me, this smarmy, parviscient moonshine serves only to emphasize how Nature is a wonderful teacher. For instance, the lesson that Nature teaches us from newly acephalous poultry is that you really don't need a brain to run around like a dang fool making a spectacle of yourself. Nature also teaches us that the manufacturer of fleet carriers uses highfalutin terms like “magnetohydrodynamics” and “tetraiodophenolphthalein” to conceal its plans to impose ideology, control thought, and punish virtually any behavior it disapproves of. In this scheme of its, a mass of grandiloquent words falls upon the facts like soft snow, blurring the outlines and covering up all the details. We become unable to see that if I had my druthers, the manufacturer of fleet carriers would never have had the opportunity to keep us perennially behind the eight ball. As it stands, the manufacturer of fleet carriers attracts the most ill-natured luftmenschen you'll ever see to its crime syndicate by telling them that it's soporific to promote productive, meaningful dialogue and mutual understanding. I suppose the people to whom it tells such things just want to believe lies that make them feel intellectually and spiritually superior to others. Whether or not that's the case, the manufacturer of fleet carriers makes it sound like we should avoid personal responsibility. The evidence against that concept is so overwhelming, even an eight-year-old child can recognize it. Even so, it is not uncommon for the manufacturer of fleet carriers to victimize the innocent, penalize the victim for making any effort to defend himself, and then paint the whole hotheaded affair as some great benefit to humanity. So, sorry for being so long-winded in this letter, but the manufacturer of fleet carriers's in late-stage addiction to quislingism.
Click to expand...
Pew pew pew!
Boom!
 

Barking_Mad

Barking_Mad
schlowi123 said:
Fleet Carrier realism and cutural discourse

ED is dead, accodring to some pilots. However, certain other pilots use the advent of fleet carriers to denote not theory, as pretextual dialectic theory suggests, but posttheory. Thus, the meaninglessness, and therefore the failure, of the simulation of the galaxy, prevalent in the non-narrative of the game, is also evident in them, although in a more subtextual sense.

If one examines fleet carriers, one is faced with a choice: either accept dialectic postsemiotic theory or conclude that this game is fundamentally meaningless, but only if the premise of pretextual dialectic theory is valid; otherwise, they have intrinsic meaning. An abundance of discourses concerning fleet carriers may be revealed. However, pretextual dialectic theory holds that ED is capable of truth.

Try it for yourself.
I'm bored and I wanted to be featured in the fleet carriers thread thread. Thus I figured that it was time for a more serious discussion of this topic.
Click to expand...

strokes goatee chin and inhales menthol cigarette

Jazz?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom