Modes 5 minutes in Open...

Who said?



And how did you get to that figure?

No one knows if Frontier have lost any customers or not due to people getting shot at in game.
But as it was never advertised as a PvE Only game, I doubt Frontier has lost that many.
Just as it was never advertised as a PvP Only game and PvE players are still here.

Now who shouldn't be in charge of anything?
Making up facts/figures to suit your argument ends badly - just ask Carillon.



Again, you cannot prove anyone has been driven away - pushed out of open in to the Mobius group, sure we see that all the time.
But constantly repeating fiction doesn't make it true.



Again, proof of people getting driven away?

Also, you're wrong. The best businesses keep as many customers as possible. So Frontier will find a way to keep both sides.
Hence why they are looking at C&P and not just banning people. They want money from everyone, not just those you like.

You also want to accuse Jason of twisting your words and setting forum traps while completely ignoring the context of what I wrote and quoting out of context comments.
Pot <-> Kettle

I tend to agree with what you're saying here. I've always assumed that players who've found shenanigans in Open intolerable have just moved to solo/group. I've never seen numbers to show otherwise.
 
Who said?
;)

And how did you get to that figure?
I'm guessing that's why it's an "if..." statement.

Again, you cannot prove anyone has been driven away
I don't really intend on doing so. I've known a bunch of them, I see the occasional review but mostly I don't think we ever hear from them again after they complain about getting ganked and get crapped on.

Pot <-> Kettle
My post directly followed yours and you STARTED A PARAGRAPH with that, come on. I get it - you don't like what I'm saying - but how about you play the point not the person.

We'll see how the C+P works. I think you'll find if someone's going to lose out it'll be the small group of gankers, guess we'll just have to wait and see.
 
They don't do anything about them for a few reasons, but the simplest being... money.

As I've said before- they won't take a stand either way because it profits them to remain quiet as long as people are buying copies of the game. When it starts hitting their balance sheet, they'll start looking at making major changes- and it won't be up to any single person at FD once that happens.

As to the "why", Seal clubbers serve as a "catalyst" in Open. It's really that simple. They're basically "tools" of FD, helping to promote how "dangerous" Elite is supposed to be.

As I've also said before, C&P 3.0 doesn't go far enough- but it's a good start in FD's acknowledgment that there's a problem to begin with. By their acknowledgement alone, they've really spoken volumes that the PvP player base alone would not be enough to sustain their balance sheet and keep this ship in the sky. Anyone who considers that point as "speculation" should consider one question... If they've been "fine" for years and the PvP base *would* sustain this game- why would they even bother to introduce changes to C&P? Why not just leave the game as it was? ;)

Patience is key to strategy.


Except that "seal clubbers" don't show how "dangerous" Elite is supposed to be... they show annoying and jerks some players can be... or are they looking through Rose colored glasses borrowed from SOE?
 
Except that "seal clubbers" don't show how "dangerous" Elite is supposed to be... they show annoying and jerks some players can be... or are they looking through Rose colored glasses borrowed from SOE?

I fully agree!

As for the fact! that people are driven into a**hole free environments: I started playing again 3 weeks ago and picked up some of my very few friendships here.
Two of them are gone where they can PLAY this GAME and won't have it get ruined by sick minded wannabees with no idea how much the revival of this game means to enthusiasts.
The original was single player anyways, so !
To the defenders of this questionable attitude:
Is this sh*t helping anyone, the seal clubbing and you defending it?
Or are you of this kind?
 
I fully agree!

As for the fact! that people are driven into a**hole free environments: I started playing again 3 weeks ago and picked up some of my very few friendships here.
Two of them are gone where they can PLAY this GAME and won't have it get ruined by sick minded wannabees with no idea how much the revival of this game means to enthusiasts.
The original was single player anyways, so !
To the defenders of this questionable attitude:
Is this sh*t helping anyone, the seal clubbing and you defending it?
Or are you of this kind?

olorin, you have a terrible attitude towards players who's goals do not align with yours, and you resort to potty mouth language to denigrate the players who you would have us believe are the one's displaying a bad attitude. I don't know about them, but I find you to be out of line.
 
olorin, you have a terrible attitude towards players who's goals do not align with yours, and you resort to potty mouth language to denigrate the players who you would have us believe are the one's displaying a bad attitude. I don't know about them, but I find you to be out of line.

It's ok if you do not like the way I express my thoughts on the topic.
But even if you think your language is better than mine, you attitude isn't.
You are going ad hominem instead of furthering the discussion.
That's a fact and I won't give it a name, so your feelings won't get hurt.
 
It's ok if you do not like the way I express my thoughts on the topic.
But even if you think your language is better than mine, you attitude isn't.
You are going ad hominem instead of furthering the discussion.
That's a fact and I won't give it a name, so your feelings won't get hurt.

You are incapable of hurting my feelings. I'm just calling a spade a spade; you're making an obscene value judgment, installing yourself on a pedestal of self righteousness and supporting the whole mess with a slew of vulgarities that you have to cleverly work around the swear filter to get published.

Nothing ad hominem about this statement or the one prior.
 
And we were making such progress:)

Personally, I just think blatant name calling such as he did should be out of bounds, and am disappointed to see you taking his side, frostypaw. Why can't we have a civilized discussion?
 
Yeah I'm afraid it's the typical "you must be as uncaring as we" thing here from them. Give em a chance and they're on it. It's ok - there'll be something about combat logging soon and the comedy will return.


Someone say Combat logging? Only in Mobius if a seal clubber tries to sneak in and go after me.. they already show they have no cares for how others play the game so they can whine as I pull the plug ^,^

olorin, you have a terrible attitude towards players who's goals do not align with yours, and you resort to potty mouth language to denigrate the players who you would have us believe are the one's displaying a bad attitude. I don't know about them, but I find you to be out of line.

You talk of terrible attitudes.. yet would "seal clubbing" be the king of terrible attitudes... of not giving a whit about others and just blowing them up to mine salt, etc...
 
Someone say Combat logging? Only in Mobius if a seal clubber tries to sneak in and go after me.. they already show they have no cares for how others play the game so they can whine as I pull the plug ^,^



You talk of terrible attitudes.. yet would "seal clubbing" be the king of terrible attitudes... of not giving a whit about others and just blowing them up to mine salt, etc...

Setting aside the fact that whatever pew pew kazaam ba-booom dakkka dakkka brrrrp! happened ingame was probably 100% fdev approved, since when do two wrongs make a right even if it wasn't? Haven't you ever heard of taking the moral high ground? C'mon guys, you're better than that.
 
And we were making such progress:)

Personally, I just think blatant name calling such as he did should be out of bounds, and am disappointed to see you taking his side, frostypaw. Why can't we have a civilized discussion?
People get upset. Learning to understand and sympathise with that and how they might react is part of being civilised and progress.
 
Sorry OP - FDEV built this box. Players do whatever they want with the mechanics of the game. I would personally prefer a structured pvp and wvw system /mechanics within a pve setting on a megaserver but that is not what we have. 20 years of mmos should have offered some foundation for Elite's game structures - but no.

Elite will always be indy niche since it caters to the DayZ survival crowd 1st (full pvp open), and the pve crowd 2nd (cheaping out the pve server via pg mode). This C&P fiasco will be a new vehicle for clever folks to inflict pain on pve'rs imo.

Hope to see you in Mobius PVE if there is still room. Last time I looked there were over 19k members. More in plain old Mobius. It's fun seeing and chatting with players from all over the world.

There isn't one thing wrong with pvp or wvw. There is no moral softness or silly psychoanalysis needed to describe players that like it. The problem is with FDEV and an under-realized game.
 
Setting aside the fact that whatever pew pew kazaam ba-booom dakkka dakkka brrrrp! happened ingame was probably 100% fdev approved, since when do two wrongs make a right even if it wasn't? Haven't you ever heard of taking the moral high ground? C'mon guys, you're better than that.

It isn't a case of two wrongs don't make a right... it is a case of one player clearly ignoring blatant signs that others do NOT want to play with them and so they "sneak" into a PVE group to MAKE others "play" with them with no other intent except to cause grief... and you're going to tell me I am wrong for denying them the satisfaction of having accomplished their objective? I'm sorry no.. at that point Combat Logging is fully justified. There is no "moral high ground" and letting them destroy you as you valiantly attempt to escape. To suggest there is, is plainly Ludicrous . They don't want to play by the rules, they have deemed themselves to be beyond them... so they can kiss it and watch their target vanish before the interdiction is done.

I and others have reasons that we don't PVP.. I will NOT be forced to even if THEY want me to...
 
Althuogh you seem to be more interested in virtue signalling than in a discussion, I will try to give you a chance to get back on topic!
situation: I am hunting in a mining zone, firing at a wanted target. A Federal Agent Python passes in front of me and catches a broadsite that only scratches its shields.
All the happy green on my radar turns into bloody red and chances are that I won't last another minute.
Now consider the griefers situation when and after he shot down another player and tell me where the balance/justice is!
 
I think you'll find if someone's going to lose out it'll be the small group of gankers, guess we'll just have to wait and see.

I hope so, but this was the sentiment when speed restrictions came out to stop griefing in mail slots and that didn't work.

So my hopes are not high.
 
Damn there is now other versions of Open?

I've been flying in open for months (weeks in game time) and I've still got to encounter a murderer.
 
Honestly..without even reading this or any of the replies...can i just take a guess at what this contains and what the general consensus is?

TLDR: He got blown up. In a video game where you can blow up ships.
The response: 50/50 One half saying duh...the other half are sorry with bleeding hearts.

If im wrong...awesome. Maybe theres hope.
If im right... my life.
 
Back
Top Bottom