hopefully it is harder to get anarchy factions into lockdown, as they are always going to be the prime targets of bountyhunters. Actually, lockdown shouldn't be relevant to anarchy at all. Dictatorship factions should thrive under lockdown
the table shown during the BGs livestream shows: Murder and Other Crimes. Murder is like always: Any Shipkill of that Minor Faction. For exampel wanted pirates Add to that Skimmer. And other crimes. And trespassing.
Killing skimmers. If they own any of the non-landable outposts. I sent one into lockdown after shooting about 40-odd skimmers in one day.
But if I remember correctly, simple murder (of non-authority) leads to civil unrest, not lockdown.
Did you get wanted status in the system or just for the planet installation ?
But, just like RL, don't believe everything you read in the press!Just look at system newspapers, they will tell you everything![]()
To get the War, do we try to move 2% to make our inf almost exactly the same, or are we ok to go to 45/34-ish?
Yes, I held back today while waiting to hear something in this thread. I only did a few missions, so hope to equalize on tomorrow's tick.matching, almost exactly the same. looks as if you have overshooted in first system, and might do so in second. don't move on before you get war pending.
Yes, I held back today while waiting to hear something in this thread. I only did a few missions, so hope to equalize on tomorrow's tick.
This has to be a bug though, right?
I don't think anyone cares about the system I'm working in. We're not in a war state, so I'm still running regular missions trying to get inf where I need it.Someone could be resisting. Also, last i checked missions had no effect in a war for the factions in a war state. I bug reported this, don't know of anything came back on it.
I often see the same. We've entered a system and want to take over all the stations systematically. No matter how much I try and manipulate the figures to match the local Anarchist group (the group least likely to have expanded into another system to create a remote block) conflict fails to be triggered.I'm trying to figure out why War has not started in a system I'm working.
We're a faction not native to the system, so we'll get wars instead of civil wars. We are only in 2 systems. I had thought that if you get close (2% ?) to a faction that has more inf than you, a CW or W would start. But I'm not seeing that.
Here's some data, sys pop is 31,000.
Us Them
12 18
21 16 (I would have thought we'd go war pending but didn't, we were in a boom state at the time and they were also in boom).
17 13
Now in the same system, with us and a different faction (these guys are the controlling faction)...
Us Them
17 52
27 46
36 40
I am unsure what to do.
They are in retreat and we have no state. If we blow by them and tomorrow is something like US=45 and Them=34, will the War still trigger? I don't really want to just goto 60% because we want to take both of their assets, so we'd have to change inf by a lot to take the second asset.
To get the War, do we try to move 2% to make our inf almost exactly the same, or are we ok to go to 45/34-ish?
I don't think anyone cares about the system I'm working in. We're not in a war state, so I'm still running regular missions trying to get inf where I need it.
The bug I was referring to was that one faction passes another on the inf ladder and no cw/w/election is triggered. An oldie but goodie, I guess, as far as bugs go, if it is a bug.
Ok so something is wrong with the Conflict mechanic.
Yesterday
Fac A 71.6%
Fac B 14.2% CW
Fac C 14.2% CW
Fac A owns both stations. Clean TR report.
I do 4 Combat missions Inf++ for Fac B
Today
Fac A 67.8%
Fac B 16.1%
Fac C 16.1%
I completed the 4 missions, and handed in just under 1M in Combat Bonds, all for Fac B.
So yes I know the % now comes from Fac A as well as should come from C. But for C to actually go up exactly the same amount as Fac B is just plain nonsense.
Anyone else experience this?
Hi,
is there something wrong with the BGS? We have won an election in our system (leading by around 40%) yesterday, but we now have got current state "none", pending state "election" now for the second time. No cooldown/recovering state.
Is it a bug or has something changed?
Thx
There seems to have been a BGS brainfart yesterday - I've been fighting for a faction that was in a civil war until yesterday, when the conflict disappeared (no assets changed hands) and today the factions are civil war pending with no cooldown shwoing for the previous CW.Hi,
is there something wrong with the BGS? We have won an election in our system (leading by around 40%) yesterday, but we now have got current state "none", pending state "election" now for the second time. No cooldown/recovering state.
Is it a bug or has something changed?
Thx
the answers are yes and no - so not yes two botha) did you get a station flip having won? b) are you now over 60% total, and not controlling faction? If the answers to both questions is yes, then I think all is probably good.
A glitch in the Matrix. And awesome, since I was trying to start a War. I don't understand what's going on now.There seems to have been a BGS brainfart yesterday - I've been fighting for a faction that was in a civil war until yesterday, when the conflict disappeared (no assets changed hands) and today the factions are civil war pending with no cooldown shwoing for the previous CW.