A question for Distant Worlds 2 explorers

[IndigoWyrd]

Clone #4, you need to contact clone #2 about that diplomatic business. It is suspected clone #5 may have tampered with it. Don’t make me regret keeping the remains of Null Zero.

 

[Mohrgan]

Are you suggesting that in a large scale war, that military leaders should not track victories and defeats? That they should completely ignore the outcome of the war they are leading? How does that even make sense?

I don't think they should. That kind of stuff went out with the Viet Nam war. But you do what you like.

Framing it as a war is pretty hilarious as well. At most, it's organized mugging. Simple street gang stuffs.

 

[Neutronium]

So wat does this lunatic want exactly? Does anyone know? As if we don't have enough problems with the disconnects...

 

[Der Zeitgeist]

Ignore this, guys. He'll get bored after a while.

Nah, I like hearing these helpless cries for attention from time to time.

 

[Dommarraa]

Isnt there an entire forum for RP ?
Or does it not get the attention some people crave ?

 

[Cmdr Esteban]

How can I gain your trust?

Wait, you're the overlord, why should you need to ask for anyone's trust? Surely your sheer unadulterated power will triumph over all the galaxy, regardless of any petty matters of trust?

I would argue that at least 1100 destroyed explorers do care about it. The tragedy is that as these explorers are being slaughtered by the hundreds, those not effected are callously turning a blind eye to their suffering.

I think you may be overstating your case.

 

[Zarek Null]

Look, Mr. Null, we're not seeing any impact of your "large scale war" on the expedition. It is progressing exactly as planned. Any effects are completely negligible.

So if you want to get anyone to negotiate about something, you're gonna have to try much harder than that.

1100 explorers killed. You don't see "any impact." The only explaination I have for this is that you don't regard hundreds of explorers being ganked as a negative impact. Only a griefer would think that way.

 

[Mohrgan]

1100 explorers killed. You don't see "any impact." The only explaination I have for this is that you don't regard hundreds of explorers being ganked as a negative impact. Only a griefer would think that way.

Or act that way....

 

[Vandaahl]

1100 explorers killed. You don't see "any impact." The only explaination I have for this is that you don't regard hundreds of explorers being ganked as a negative impact. Only a griefer would think that way.

Deflate your head. As far as your data concerned, it could be one stubborn little bastid being killed 1100 times.

 

[Zarek Null]

This wouldn't be the first time in human history that those with the ability to help *did nothing* while multitudes of innocents were relentlessly slaughtered.

 

[Mohrgan]

Deflate your head. As far as your data concerned, it could be one stubborn little bastid being killed 1100 times.

Or, maybe, the spreadsheet is looking for attention too.

 

[Mohrgan]

This wouldn't be the first time in human history that those with the ability to help *did nothing* while multitudes of innocents were relentlessly slaughtered.

Get back to us when you do something to help.

 

[Cmdr Esteban]

This wouldn't be the first time in human history that those with the ability to help *did nothing* while multitudes of innocents were relentlessly slaughtered.

Still overstating your case there, ol' Zarek!

 

[EUS]

Wait, am I at war because I'm an explorer?
Did I declare war?
How do explorers fight wars?
BTW, just because I'm part of DW2, doesn't mean I gave anyone else the right to speak for me.

 

[Der Zeitgeist]

This wouldn't be the first time in human history that those with the ability to help *did nothing* while multitudes of innocents were relentlessly slaughtered.

Remind us again, why are you slaughtering innocents?

 

[Aashenfox]

This wouldn't be the first time in human history that those with the ability to help *did nothing* while multitudes of innocents were relentlessly slaughtered.

Erm...you're the one slaughtering them. If you think it should stop, then, erm...stop? Normally it would be a third party asking a fourth to join, not the killers asking to be opposed. How weird is this? lol

 

[BeppoSax]

Can I suggest we deal with Brexit first and then maybe table a motion after March ?

 

[Vandaahl]

Erm...you're the one slaughtering them. If you think it should stop, then, erm...stop? Normally it would be a third party asking a fourth to join, not the killers asking to be opposed. How weird is this? lol

Or maybe we got it all wrong and he is asking for help because his men are getting slaughtered.

Well, men...

 

[Ian Skippy]

Wait, you're the overlord, why should you need to ask for anyone's trust? Surely your sheer unadulterated power will triumph over all the galaxy, regardless of any petty matters of trust?

Because Zarek is a benevolent Overlord, who wants to give those of us who can handle it their freedom. But that requires trust from both sides.

And some cleansing fire.

 

[EUS]

I have no leader.
You want to sue for peace? List your demands, quit footing around.
OMG, p.u.s.s.y.f.o.o.t.i.n.g is a censured word here?