I would still like to know the legitimate way we were supposed to find these sites. I have an SSD and cant rely on the slow recall speed of a mechanical drive.
This was not the intended method for finding these sites and again we have bypassed the entire game mechanic. This is no better than if you datamined the locations.
...
Either someone has figured out how to find these things legitimately and are not sharing or we are just shooting ourselves in the foot again. It cant be both. In less than 4 days we went from 4 apparent brute force found sites to 12. At this point I could not care less what about the outcome of the guadrians story line. Its been ruined utterly and is probably one of the most game breaking events I have ever been involved with.
After a good number of hours doing visual scans a couple of weeks back, I headed home to help refresh my enthusiasm on this hunt. Upon reading the Galnet item (now apparently deleted) about other sites being reported, I returned and seeing the front page of this thread, was staggered and the number of sites discovered so rapidly. Even more so when I caught up reading, and found that there is apparently no known method for locating these sites.
Either the number of CMDRs brute forcing is way, way up... or something else is going on.
Whatever the case may be, I hope that those developers who work on this part of Elite will not allow the bugs and such to divert their thinking away from the in-game type of story path that was planned with revealing the Guardians. I very much prefer this approach, as opposed to having to keep up with the forum, looking for what others have done and following what some few other players are actually doing.
For the most part, this story unfolded well for me. I knew there was a "mission" out there for this research. I found it on my own, just thinking things through. I mapped all the original site scan combinations myself, without any outside reading. Aside from the bugs directly related to the scan reports (and the uncertainty they caused as I progressed), IMO all that played out well.
The participation in searches for additional sites was the weaker element, IMO. Without some way to have any hunch what/why I was doing, I just couldn't persevere doing the random visual searches. Even so, others certainly have prevailed on this, and we move on.
Sorry for my post going off the topic.