For this reason I think the closest we'll get is a planet, not coordinates. Perhaps a planet in each system, I think a "daisy-chain" pattern is more likely. We find one more ruin, that leads us to another, and so on.
Alien archeology and other mysteries: Thread 9 - The Canonn
- Thread starter Ian Phillips
- Start date
- Status
For this reason I think the closest we'll get is a planet, not coordinates. Perhaps a planet in each system, I think a "daisy-chain" pattern is more likely. We find one more ruin, that leads us to another, and so on.
No we don't, because there is no sufficient evidence that suggests that the planet requires a moon.
Latitude is something we might also get, considering it is basically just the angle between a point on the sphere and the axis of rotation of the planet.
The central line follows roughly the moon's path (so points at where it rises). Barnards loop rises in the middle of the wide flare on the west. not sure if anyone found an alignment with the smaller flare on the "key stem".
There was theory last week that it is a henge with a 6.9day cycle . Don't think anything more came of that though.
edit: although perhaps a mark against henge theory is that it would require round-the-clock observation for a week, unless it could be predicted?
Last edited:
I agree with this. I don't know wether or not we are chasing our tails by trying to apply angles and find co-ords, but in theory its mathmatically possible ^^^
Yep, that's valid.
Just for peace of mind - the red circle is a standard randomly generated POI?
Given that you've altered your HUD color, probably? You've inverted the original orange to light blue, so the dark blue/purple could switch to red.
What I did was actually a bit more complicated, I chose just to do a simple picture - I had to use measurements with a compass and ruler - and guess what? The angles of the gaps ended up being 64'ish (plus other measurements) - which is a bit too suspect with everything else taken into consideration.
By all means, don't bother to check them out, honestly no skin off my back lol - just stare at some rings instead, because they probably have just as much geometry to them like triangles.
I have spoted that their is drawing of triangle on the ruins. they seem to pass over the topography. They are not easy to spot but on certain map they are pretty clear (i know this one is ancient but it's the clearer) and i have verified on site there existence.
If we superpose the two circular structur, scale one image it so the 5 sort of tooth gear amtch perfectly and rotate it then tadaaa. The two triangle and the extra lines match !!
What do you think of it ?
(English is not my native language, please be kind [smile])
If we superpose the two circular structur, scale one image it so the 5 sort of tooth gear amtch perfectly and rotate it then tadaaa. The two triangle and the extra lines match !!
What do you think of it ?
(English is not my native language, please be kind [smile])
Actually I wonder, how did you connect the piece that you connected to 31° to 31°? I measured its angle from the main ridge through the center of the large hill to be roughly 15-16°?
Did you multiply by 2, or what exactly is your reasoning there?
Did you multiply by 2, or what exactly is your reasoning there?
I'm pretty confident each one of those angles is important. Especially since they align with big things in the stars. But we have part of an answer, the systems. Can you point to one of those systems with our alien ruins? If a very intelligent and sophisticated race designed the architecture to point to one or more sites they'd include more information then a pair of coordinates.
And we can spend all day long drawing angles between things in the old site and come up with so many numbers that the next site's coordinates will be among them. Just by accident.
This 100% this.
It is interesting that if there may be 7 sites (101 scans and 13 intended from the first site) and there are 7 obelisk clusters. Maybe the center of mass of each obelisk cluster is a set of coordinates on your grid. It is difficult to say exactly how the grid should be oriented and scaled. Also longitude is a relative measurement (though latitute is absolute), so also a difficulty, but maybe the ones overlooked.
I like your thinking. Some of the designs on the ruins resemble shapes found in the UP spectrogram. What if the central mound does represent a planet, and the shapes around it correspond to its properties. Like the long line is its radius, the line off of it is its tilt, the long shelf to the left marks its gravity, and the rings circling it is a measure of radiation? Maybe its trying to describe this planet, or another one.
Looking back over ram tah's galnet article he said explore these systems... he did not say planets... this could mean something is hidden in the system in general... could be in an asteroid field... there are several bands of them near the star or atleast places to drop from sc at or rings of a planet...
Last edited:
This is a plausible theory as the first time you looked at the system your eyes where drawn to just how many landable planets there are... maybe that was just to distract you
But what scale will be used? If the distances do represent something[aside from being used to measure angles], we will need some reference. As such, the ruins we found should also contain a map to themselves, otherwise we would have no way of knowing the appropriate scale.
Exactly... i am curious how many astroid fields there are... and wonder if something is hidden there
- Status