A few weeks ago I got the engineered 5A FSD V1.
It's fantastic giving around 3ly more than 5A FSD increased range 5 + mass manager, and the faster boot time - well I don't really notice that.
But all 5A FSD V1s are not the same.
I've seen a number of people post coriolis links for exploration ship builds where the 5A FSD V1 has optimal mass set at 1856.
My 5A FSD V1 has optimal mas 1785 which is better than standard range 5 + mass manager 1693, but not as good as what some people have.
Did FDev nerf the quality of the FSD V1 at some point?
I feel a tiny bit cheated....
It's fantastic giving around 3ly more than 5A FSD increased range 5 + mass manager, and the faster boot time - well I don't really notice that.
But all 5A FSD V1s are not the same.
I've seen a number of people post coriolis links for exploration ship builds where the 5A FSD V1 has optimal mass set at 1856.
My 5A FSD V1 has optimal mas 1785 which is better than standard range 5 + mass manager 1693, but not as good as what some people have.
Did FDev nerf the quality of the FSD V1 at some point?
I feel a tiny bit cheated....