Read in another thread some poor chap had 50 rolls trying to get a special ( 6% chance ) and failed ... Shouldn't engineers also come with a gamblers warning ? 
http://www.gambleaware.co.uk/
http://www.gambleaware.co.uk/
Don't you know that Engineer is the new cowboy?
It misses me off that in some countries (mine included) Maintenance Engineers are thought of as janitors. Not that there is anything wrong with being a janitor. At all, at all.
Nope, not my xp. Don't know what was said before or promised, but in current 2.1' just yesterday in fact, finally did my first few sets of FSD improvements (spent first week just ranking up felicity to level 4 and of course scouring the universe for yttrium)
skipped rank 1 and 2 so don't know about those, but rolled a nice level 3 fsd with about 20% improvement.
then made first leve 4 and got worse stats then the prior level 3
two more rolls and got lucky and rolled a nice 29% level 4 fsd.
i stopped there because out of yttrium and I figure 29% out of 35% max is good enough. Am afraid if I try level 4 again I will just get lower rolls so saving up for eventual level 5 attempt.
My thoughts exactly.
They should have never been called Engineers. They are not engineers. They are tinkerers. The actual defnition of Engineer I had in my signature put the argument to bed. Part of the process of engineering is preparing and predicting the outcome and accounting for its own shortcomings.
Be careful with that, my lvl5 roll came out worse than my lvl4. Took a little more hunting for mats but I got it better in the end.
Last edited:
http://inara.cz/galaxy-blueprint/2
Best result for a grade 2 upgrade is 14%. The worst result for a grade 4 is 11%
So it is possible to go from a grade 2 to a grade 4 and end up worse than you started. The minimal values obviously need to be adjusted
