If you get a refund of the game, do you think that you will also get a refund of all the paints job and other extras that you bought for the game ?
Bobbleheads all over the Milky Way know the score.
If you get a refund of the game, do you think that you will also get a refund of all the paints job and other extras that you bought for the game ?
Some just aren't quite grasping the gravity of the situation here, are they?
Frontier Developments reserves the right to modify, alter, amend, or update this EULA at any time in its sole discretion
Any continued Use of the Game <afterwards> constitutes your acceptance
We may deploy or provide patches, updates and modifications to the Game that must be installed in order for you to continue to play the Game
you hereby grant us your consent to deploy and apply such patches, updates and modifications
Like I said, give it another month or so. It will definitely sink in.
PP is only the beginning, as I've said before. Many times.
Ask for a refund ? Why ?
Many many times. Many many many many times.
...but here FD is thinking about changing the basic nature of the game after we bought it.
You should have asked for your refund when PP was introduced after you bought the game, then, because it's not what you paid for >.>
I thought the Engineers was as low as it was possible to go in bad game design, but here FD is thinking about changing the basic nature of the game after we bought it.
Not that i really care whether pp is open only or not, but just on the principle that FD shouldnt be rewarded for changing the basic nature of the product from what was advertised and sold, I am thiniking about asking for a refund. This sets a precedent i dont want to see play out.
A vendor removing basic features from a product after its sold and the money is in the vendors pocket seems unethical, maybe fradulent, and possibly illegal.
Where there's blame there's a claim!
Does it do exactly what it says on the tin?
#iwanna-refund
BootcampLet it go, let it go.
Am a Mac only player and the end is in sight for me.
I’ve paid my dues, time after time...
I thought the Engineers was as low as it was possible to go in bad game design, but here FD is thinking about changing the basic nature of the game after we bought it.
Not that i really care whether pp is open only or not, but just on the principle that FD shouldnt be rewarded for changing the basic nature of the product from what was advertised and sold, I am thiniking about asking for a refund. This sets a precedent i dont want to see play out.
A vendor removing basic features from a product after its sold and the money is in the vendors pocket seems unethical, maybe fradulent, and possibly illegal.