I would like better than the 12-25 FPS I get...The argument that video games don't benefit from more than 60 FPS because a human being wouldn't even be able to perceive that is utter nonsense.
I would like better than the 12-25 FPS I get...The argument that video games don't benefit from more than 60 FPS because a human being wouldn't even be able to perceive that is utter nonsense.
Your memory serves you well... It did said that, and to add more to it, the game itself in first Alpha stage did truly showed as in trailer... Even on my gtx 1070 i was able to experience it, albeit on a 20fps show, but it was there.... Downgrade happened update after update, which was dissapointing, even if my potato would never had the resources needed to load that.If my memory serves me... (but I may be in error) the last couple of EDO pre-launch trailers were 'in-game footage' rather than in engine.
Screenies were produced using the now removed 'Ultra for capture' setting, which I do recall making great scenery, at a cost to FPS, of course.
If you're talking about the launch trailer, you'll notice that there is a huge gap in quality between an action gameplay sceneries and a chill gameplay sceneries. You'll also notice that there are some features that were not at launch (like the atmosphere tint) or that there were already some weird bugs we still have, like the center plan being less detailled than the fore, back and sides plans.i absolutely remember those adds... they were dodgy Bullshot adds and i had no respect for those when they made them...... however the bit of the post i quoted is the important part for me.... now most companies who still insist on this (and i still dont like this) put not in game footage on them.
Even FD did this when they launched their outrageously fake elite launch promo video ...... and yet despite it saying not ingame footage a lot still complained - and it generated meme videos of "elite trailer vs elite gameplay"
At the time i am fairly confident (but dont have a link i am afraid so discount if you want) that FD said from then on that their trailers would actually use genuine in engine unmodified video........... and AFAIK they have generally done just that. It is why i believed their launch EDO trailer.... and tbh it is still possible it WAS genuine
(but maybe running on SLI 3090s or summat)
i would be interested to know actually.
You right. Even the Ultra+ is now the shadow of what it was when it replaced the UltraForCapture (especially during the approaching phase)Your memory serves you well... It did said that, and to add more to it, the game itself in first Alpha stage did truly showed as in trailer... Even on my gtx 1070 i was able to experience it, albeit on a 20fps show, but it was there.... Downgrade happened update after update, which was dissapointing, even if my potato would never had the resources needed to load that.
i remember playing geoff crammonds F1GP and stunt car racer on the amiga back in the day... iirc they ran at............ around 7 i think....... FPS. not saying i want to go back to then howeverI would like better than the 12-25 FPS I get...
I would like better than the 12-25 FPS I get...
Operating System: Windows 10 Pro 64-bit (10.0, Build 19041) (19041.vb_release.191206-1406)What's in this tater tot of a system?
Well, there's your issue right there.Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-6500 CPU @ 3.20GHz (4 CPUs), ~3.2GHz
Nah.Well, there's your issue right there.
Ground sites have a lot of AI. AI uses CPU, not GPU. It's your CPU that's grinding to a halt when you enter settlements.
God knows i have my issues with the direction of Elite, and i do have concerns about this narrative content........ but only in so far as it is a 1 shot and done kind of thing....... once it is done it is done and if you miss it, it has gone, rather than content which goes into the game and can be done either today or in 12 months time.Suffice as to say Odyssey reeks of bad, bad code and after 18 months of totally inept patching they gave up!
All we have now is twitch drops and people chasing lights across the sky box in their tin foil hats.
No new ships for over 4 years and a narrative that just drones on with zero new content.
Well, there's your issue right there.
Ground sites have a lot of AI. AI uses CPU, not GPU. It's your CPU that's grinding to a halt when you enter settlements.
Excellent! Now, front me the money for a new PC for just one game.Well, there's your issue right there.
Ground sites have a lot of AI. AI uses CPU, not GPU. It's your CPU that's grinding to a halt when you enter settlements.
Keep that negative re-inforcement coming! I love the negative validation!Nah.
He plays on a GT 1030 which doesn't even meet the minimum requirement of the game. Not even close. I guess that's going to be the biggest problem.
He's just giving you the facts. I wouldn't take it personally (believe me, if Bab was aiming to put you down, you'd know it).Keep that negative re-inforcement coming! I love the negative validation!
Guy !! Your GFX is being eaten by a GTX 560 TI. The mid-range of 2011 !!! What do you expect ?Keep that negative re-inforcement coming! I love the negative validation!
at some point games move on........ it really wont cost the earth to imporve your gpu with a 2nd hand one that will have a radical improvement.Keep that negative re-inforcement coming! I love the negative validation!
Well, you could buy a ship in Star Citizen for the cost of a decent gaming rig...Excellent! Now, front me the money for a new PC for just one game.![]()