I forwarded mine as well.
While I'm glad to see action being taken, I'm slightly concerned that it seems to be taking a PM to Frontier to get things done and that the in-game reporting doesn't seem to be leading anywhere on its own.
Actually, I believe Frontier has (had it for at least a year?) all the data it needs to take immediate automatic action against hackers after their first kill..
So I presume "Reporting Hackers" was primarily designed as a way for players to "vent steam" not to "communicate with Frontier" (Frontier indirectly acknowledged as much).
What is really surprising/concerning is that they decided not to implement automatic hacker ban/disconnect.
Admittedly, there would be an "arms race" with the hack developer(s) if Frontier goes for it.
But to my best knowledge "the developer(s)" is just one and a half guys (one with actual day job) - there is not much chance of Frontier loosing the arms race if they put even a little effort into it.
If costs of such effort looks prohibitive to Frontier:
I previously suggested to Frontier to publish their "tracking data" (after hiding user identity (so real user IDs are not available)) for us to analyze it and develop hacker detection algorithms. All it would take for Frontier is to stand up another ES server - probably $100/month of upkeep on EC2 (for a month of "full game" data, perhaps $10/month for just CQC) and a tiny bit of dev time to "sanitize the data" going into it. Community would take over and figure out for certain who is hacking and who is not..
And btw hacking plagues the main game much more than CQC. It is just extra annoying in CQC (you kind of locked in a box with the hacker..)
