'Attack of the AI' III

How is the AI for you in 2.1.02?

  • I'm too young to die! (Waaay too easy)

    Votes: 25 3.1%
  • Hey' not too rough (Too easy)

    Votes: 89 11.2%
  • Hurt me plenty (About right)

    Votes: 365 46.0%
  • Ultra-Voilence (Too hard)

    Votes: 231 29.1%
  • Nightmare! (Waaay too hard)

    Votes: 84 10.6%

  • Total voters
    794
  • Poll closed .
@Red Anders: Have I already mentioned that your avatar totally creeps me out?

If not, your avatar totally creeps me out. xD
 

This is a proper Red Flanders.

ned005.gif
 
How about this, post some frikin evidence as opposed to the usual ..

Repeat after me:

"The fact that I haven't experienced a bug does not mean that no-one has."

Not everyone has the means to record hours of play in the hope of capturing an elusive bug.

People have posted their experiences, with as much detail as they can. If you're prepared to stick your fingers in your ears and call it '', well...

Don't expect anyone to take you seriously.
 
Repeat after me:

"The fact that I haven't experienced a bug does not mean that no-one has."

Not everyone has the means to record hours of play in the hope of capturing an elusive bug.

People have posted their experiences, with as much detail as they can. If you're prepared to stick your fingers in your ears and call it '', well...

Don't expect anyone to take you seriously.

You're the one claiming to have the bug. Therefore the burden of proof lies with you.

Don't expect anyone to take you seriously WITHOUT evidence.

- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -

I gave him one for ya.

Becks is a shortform of Rebecca ;)
 
Repeat after me:

"The fact that I haven't experienced a bug does not mean that no-one has."

Not everyone has the means to record hours of play in the hope of capturing an elusive bug.

People have posted their experiences, with as much detail as they can. If you're prepared to stick your fingers in your ears and call it '', well...

Don't expect anyone to take you seriously.

After seing endless rant posts of players claiming there were AI bugs and/or NPC superweapons which "melted shields in seconds", followed by videos of said players flying eagles and facetanking with 0 pips in SYS and other similar situations, you have to understand that it became hard to simply take word as evidence and taking such "bug" reports seriously.
 
After seing endless rant posts of players claiming there were AI bugs and/or NPC superweapons which "melted shields in seconds", followed by videos of said players flying eagles and facetanking with 0 pips in SYS and other similar situations, you have to understand that it became hard to simply take word as evidence and taking such "bug" reports seriously.

Of course, there were also the videos that showed 'shields melting in seconds' actually happening, which appear to have been conveniently forgotten by these pseudo-sceptics now that one major cause of problems has been taken out of the game. That doesn't mean there aren't any others.

Loud demands for proof mean nothing because, it's pretty clear, no amount of proof will be enough for some people. They're just trying to avoid admitting that they might be wrong.
 
One ship in ten now comes in interdicts and just totally obliterates me in a matter of 10-15 seconds disabling everything and there is nothing I can do...
 
Back
Top Bottom