Blocking feature being abused or was it intended to be this way? FDEV?

I thought so, too, but I've heard enough worrisome talk about how blocking screws up instancing in unforeseen ways that I can't rule it out. Ultimately I don't care if someone doesn't want to play with me, but I do care plenty if by abusing the blocking feature people are messing up my ability to play with the people who DO want to be in the same instance with me.

Ultimately I'm giving Fdev a C- for this feature. I'd sure like it if they'd instead spend time on developing fun mechanics to the actual game.

The Friends List will have just as much influence on your instancing, as the Block List can. If the Block list has to go, it looks like the friends list may need removal as well.
 
People keep quoting the "cutthroat galaxy" stuff. What about the part in the same marketing material that says you can play along side others, your friends, or alone? People only see what they want to see. Put plainly, using marketing slogans to prop up an agenda is as useless as most RL comparisons, and all analogies you see posted.

Those are just lame attempts at justifying their bad behavior. Its obvious to me that they are already frustrated by the increasing lack of innocent victims in their instances that they prefer to focus on. The ones who don't/can't shoot back basically.

The good guys in OPEN... The ones who go after A-holes who blow up innocent players including Fuel Rats and the like seem to have no shortage of viable targets in open. ;)

My guess is that unlike this obnoxious vocal minority of miscreants, fair play PvPers are not being blocked by large numbers of players, and thus they see plenty of other human players in their open mode games. :)

This is just as it should be. :D
 
Those are just lame attempts at justifying their bad behavior. Its obvious to me that they are already frustrated by the increasing lack of innocent victims in their instances that they prefer to focus on. The ones who don't/can't shoot back basically.

The good guys in OPEN... The ones who go after A-holes who blow up innocent players including Fuel Rats and the like seem to have no shortage of viable targets in open. ;)

My guess is that unlike this obnoxious vocal minority of miscreants, fair play PvPers are not being blocked by large numbers of players, and thus they see plenty of other human players in their open mode games. :)

This is just as it should be. :D

Bad behaviour? What does that even equate to?. What part was i behaving badly? By flying towards someone at a bounty hunting CG or for the act of interdiction?. I think every player in elite knows what to expect at a CG, more so at a bounty CG in open. If they dont want that then there are plenty of options available to them to avoid this already.
 
Such as liberal use of the block feature.

Perhaps a tad too liberal when players start to block others on a percieved threat rather than an actual threat or to stop harrasment (as i imagine it was the intended use).

Edit - jump into system, see a player unknown to you, block on the off chance they may or may not try to kill you. Thats pretty bad mechanics at play right there.
 
Last edited:
That sounded like he was replying to me, but since I plonked him I'm not seeing his drivel any more unless somebody quotes it.

For what it's worth, I'm not judging people by their in-game actions - I am, however, judging whether they are people I want to play with. Joe Q Cmdr may be a wonderful person if I met him personally, but if he's a poor sportsman and plays like a slimeball - which has nothing to do with whether or not his ship shoots at mine, but more to do with why - then in-game he is being a slimeball and I reserve the right to not play with somebody who plays like that. I'd rather play with somebody who shows a little more respect even if we find ourselves in conflict. I'm likely to find those other people in a different instance to the jerks, since they are likely to have blocked the jerks already so by blocking the jerks myself I'm actually increasing my chances of more meaningful gameplay with better players.

You bow to an opponent in the dojo, or salute them in the fencing salle or touch gloves in the boxing ring to show respect for your opponent and acknowledge the fight that's coming and then you give it your best shot knowing that they will do the same. The cheap shot artists spamming remarks about my parentage or about my mother into chat don't have any of that respect in them and so they simply aren't worthy of my time or my effort to fight them. Yeah, they'll bite the block list.

Having blocked me in the forums, when I've meant no disrespect and was actually prone to discuss anything in a polite manner, shows lack of maturity and a small heart overall. Says a lot about your reasons for defending MultiBlock.
 
Sorry but you're terribly naïve if you expect people NOT to judge others by their in-game actions. And why shouldn't that be the case? Why is it so different from judging someone by what I see them do in the street or in a pub or at a restaurant or movie? Sorry but if the only indication of a person's character IS what I see them do in-game, or for that matter what they themselves admit to doing in-game by posting things like youtube videos, then I will very much judge them by that. If I see someone act like a jerk, then I'm going to assess them as being a jerk, whether that be in person or in-game....at least until I observe evidence of behaviour to the contrary. And if the person I judge doesn't like that, well tough....if one doesn't want to be judged a jerk then don't act like one. Simple really.

Games =\= Real Life. Your arguments prove your think they're the same.
 
One Block mechanism is as good as another. Splitting hairs as to what tool to use is just petty. One Commander has no claim on the attention of another. My right to control my gaming experience, is more important than anyone's right to shoot at me. These assertions should be obvious, what could possibly be left to contend with?
 
Last edited:
One Block mechanism is as good as another. Splitting hairs as to what tool to used is just petty. One Commander has no claim on the attention of another. My right to control my gaming experience, is more important than anyone's right to shoot at me. These assertions should be obvious, what could possibly be left to contend with?

God forbid anyone shoot at you in a game with laser beams and little rules regarding interaction. Sure , block players for being abusive etc but to block someone at the mere thought they may be hostile without any indication of such is excessive.
 
God forbid anyone shoot at you in a game with laser beams and little rules regarding interaction. Sure , block players for being abusive etc but to block someone at the mere thought they may be hostile without any indication of such is excessive.

Yes, that's excessive, but the choice of the other party.

the game is not a an MMO... it is many things: empty, boring, not deep, not have mechanics, not have players... but it is not for sure an MMO

Totally OT here.
 
I never said being an a hole was encourage, I said ingame assault was, whether for cargo, PP rivalry, CG opposition, lore opposition, etc.

Assault ingame isn't the same thing as assault out of game, for one thing it's completely irrelevant and inconsequential, this is a hobby where no one is harmed by a fake ship blowing up. If someone is rude and harassing you report them and they will be dealt with for violating TOS. But out of game assault is a much more morally and legally repugnant action. If you can't see the difference you need to take a break from the game and the forum, it's unhealthy to let the lines between the fictional and the real world blur like that.

(And no I don't care what your biography is, on the internet anonymous people tend to lie or exaggerate about their real life so all stories must be assumed to be fake.)

Jason. People here take offense from being assaulted in game as if it were in Real Life.

We need a reality check.
 
God forbid anyone shoot at you in a game with laser beams and little rules regarding interaction. Sure , block players for being abusive etc but to block someone at the mere thought they may be hostile without any indication of such is excessive.

Who can know why a player ganks/blocks another player? It could be PP, it could be RP, it could almost for any reason. Just because you don't know the reason, doesn't mean there is no reason.

I've been shot at by plenty of people. I flew with AA for over a year, and fought with and learned from some of the best. Stow your stereotypes where you can't reach them.
 
yeah I suggest you to call a moderator and kill me please.

Call a moderator: Nah. There are enough mods watching this thread. Also it was merely the tip that your general criticism of ED doesn't belong here as it's a thread about the block function of the game.

Kill you: Nah. Not even if you say please.
 
OK I'm just gonna say it, why does anyone even care about this anyway? I don't play in open as don't really see the point (don't plan on being ganked by gangs of pvp ships whilst I haul or am pve fit), however for those that do why is this even an issue? If someone decides to play in open but blocks all the people they desire, so what? Alternative is if they couldn't they would just play in another mode or possibly not at all - either way the gankers don't get their candy. So if people in open want more people in open to play with, perhaps some people need to adjust how they approach playing in open so it appeals to a wider audience... I think you know what I mean.
 
Who can know why a player ganks/blocks another player? It could be PP, it could be RP, it could almost for any reason. Just because you don't know the reason, doesn't mean there is no reason.

I've been shot at by plenty of people. I flew with AA for over a year, and fought with and learned from some of the best. Stow your stereotypes where you can't reach them.

Please point out which stereotypes i used, i made no mention of any in my post. Is this a perceived stereotype without any indication of such.. maybe a block is in order :)
 
I'm just imagining ED Forum if people use Block here like the game feature.

This guy says things I don't agree. Take a Block

Fast forward:

Guys EvE4Evah is a scrub who defends EvE playstyle of cutthroating for ED. Block him

[knocked out]
 
I'm just imagining ED Forum if people use Block here like the game feature.

This guy says things I don't agree. Take a Block

Fast forward:

Guys EvE4Evah is a scrub who defends EvE playstyle of cutthroating for ED. Block him

[knocked out]

Some do that. Some don't. ^^
 
Back
Top Bottom