Except Blue's skin was never expected. Wanted, hoped for, but not expected. There was never anything that lead people to believe it would or should be in the game. If you had these expectations, then they come from a fabricated source. You are not entitled to a skin of Blue, and comparing this game to other completely different games whose developers have different visions for their games is a flawed argument. Frontier is choosing not to use the skin of Blue as she is a unique and they want to maintain that. That is an artistic choice. There is nothing wrong with that choice. It'll probably be one we just have to deal with unless there was enough demand and Universal gives them the okay. Judging by how this thread is going though, and how there aren't exactly a lot of them with the same topic despite the "sizable portion of people" you claim to have expected this asset, a Blue skin is not something we're getting. Not anytime soon, at least.
Your comment in regards to my post is the definition of cherry picking. You invalidate my list but avoid the point I made about Aloy's appearance being used in Monster Hunter World and in conjunction how looking like a character is not the same as being a specific character. Again these are not the same. Saying my argument is flawed on the basis of me comparing one video game to another is at best laughable. Its obvious the games I listed are different than Jurassic World Evolution. They were different from each other but comparing and contrasting elements in those games to other games such as but not limited to characterization, story structure, graphics, COSMETCIS, is within the realm of reason because your focusing on specific aspects, which I did. The specific aspect was cosmetics. How can you honestly say an argument is flawed because someone compared it to something else. If were going by your logic then we can't compare movies to each other in regards to key aspects of movies such as but not limited to directing, cinematography, pacing, actor performance. Yes you can compare movies of the same genre, but also movies from different genre only on the basis of core elements. So again going by your logic we can't compare anything if they don't share the exact same attributes.
Also there is nothing artistic about the ability to choose to look different in a game. Creating what a character looks like in a game is artistic. Giving the player the option to choose to look different in said game is game design because you have created/designed the game in such way that you have either allowed or eliminated the option for the player to choose to be able to make their character look different from it's default appearance.
The argument of Blue being "unique" just no, stop. She's no more unique than Echo, Charlie, or Delta. If the script for Jurassic World had Charlie live then she'd be "unique". And please don't rely on the lore to portray her as such. In Fallen Kingdom the video logs show her as emphatic unlike her sisters. But wait in Jurassic World she along with her sisters were about to kill the new guy in the Raptor Pen AND Owen. I guess she just wasn't in the mood to show empathy. Blue is unique because she was the raptor that just so happen to live and took part in the fight with the Indominus Rex with Rexy. Universal then plastered her all over the marketing and merchandise because people were commenting how cool she was. Any of her sisters had an equal chance to be "unique" if they were written as such in the movie and she was the raptor extra. So please stop using the lore when Fallen Kingdom contracted the whole of the franchise.
You highlighting "sizable portion of people" and basically mocking it is also funny. Its not hard to see that people on multiple platforms are clamoring for raptor movie skins(Blue included). No I don't know the exact number but enough people are speaking up that its topic. But I guess the "sizable portion of people" who want more decorations, buildings, and terrain tools, are justified in their in request. But we can only "claim" they exist and not that they actually do. But the places that they're postings; how they want more decorations, buildings, and terrain tools, the "sizable portion of people" who want raptor movie skins are posting in those very same places. If I can see people asking for more buildings in Jurassic World, I'm positive you've seen the raptor skin request too. But thats right, easier to ignore something when constructing an argument on personal bias because the evidence contradicts your argument, and the evidence; people want raptor movie skins and are saying it on the Jurassic World subreddit, Jurassic World forum, the Youtube comment section on Jurassic World Evolution videos, especially those videos concerning dinosaur skins. And these very same people can expect to see her or any other raptor skin or anything that was in a Jurassic Park/World. To not do so is silly. Thats like saying a game developer isn't gonna put Goku in a fighting game about Dragon Ball Z. Remember, using Frontier's own logic, Goku is unique, because he's the only pure blood kind hearted saiyan and we want to honor his character because of his uniqueness within the Dragon Ball franchise. THIS IS SILLY. Goku is a fan favorite like Blue, Goku has merchandise on him like Blue, Goku is all over the marketing for his franchise like Blue, but we weren't suppose to expect Goku to be in a game about Dragon Ball and its unreasonable to do so. again, THIS IS SILLY.
In short should we have her skin(NOT her character or personality) in the game? Yes, without question. Frontier is the only studio to deliberately choose to not follow the Jurassic Park franchise license when it comes to asset implementation. Every other studio before them implemented the dinosaurs how they were portrayed from the movies and we can go back to Super Nintendo, Genesis, and Sony Playstation and the dinosaurs were how they were portrayed in the movies. So no this "Frontier can do want they want its their game" is nonsense in the face of others who came before them and portrayed the dinosaurs how they were supposed to be, and you bought those games EXPECTING THEM TO LOOK LIKE THEY DID IN THE MOVIES. Its very sad to see this apologist mentality and usage of the "lore" and how people bend over backwards to make it make sense in their argument and excuse and make excuses for Frontier's actions when they don't measure up in areas they should.