And the point of my reply was essentially that anyone can trigger a lockdown. Triggering an election is far harder in a high-traffic system such as Eranin due to the incumbency effect.
The TCF got into a war in Morgor between the 11th and 14th of September that neutralised the non-combat BGS inputs in Eranin (trade, mission running, explo data) in the days leading up to the election. The influence declines across all TCF systems is clear in the Inara faction summary - that was the opportunity that was so ruthlessly taken by our phantom flippers.
...government types in most of the bubble also affect the ease of Powerplay control of particular spheres, which even if you don't directly care who "wins" Powerplay this week ... most of the Powerplay spheres further apply global effects to trade prices and/or service availability.
...there are feedback effects (in that you don't have to care who owns a station for the fact that other people *do* to affect you) on things like CG placement, Thargoid raids, etc. Occasionally these - e.g. Lave - get big enough to be more obviously noticeable.
Of course, the bubble is large enough that one can avoid having to care in the slightest who owns any particular station or set of systems - if the local configuration is unfavourable, there will be plenty of other places which are better, and if one of those becomes unfavourable later it's always possible to move on again. That's not the same as the local changes being unimportant, though.
This, of course, depends on Power Play actually mattering. It could go away completely and I wouldn't really notice. My only involvement in Power Play has been purely module collecting. The people, places and politics couldn't matter less.
I haven't participated in a CG in I can't remember how long. I've never gotten invovled in CG's because the outcome has mattered, only the income. Thargoids do not interest or concern me. I've seen them, scanned them, shot them, cleaned up station messes they've left. But they are going to continue to do what they are going to do regardless of our participation. And I don't think I've even flown through Lave in over a year. It's of no interest or use to me. If the star went nova and the system were sucked into a black hole, I'd still not notice. Unlike many, I don't have any ties to the 1984 version or any other bits of historic Elite.
That's exactly what makes them unimportant... "Don't like it here, then leave." applies far too much to Elite. There's no real reason to bind one's self to any particular system. There's no actual benefit to it. If we had player bases, or some actual financial ties - investments paying weekly or the like, then there would be an actual reason to take an interest in things. If boarders could actually be closed to pilots of one power or another - or we could actually belong to our Player Named Factions (which we can't currently, potentially ever).
Lave, Eranin, Leesti, Ross 128 and a number of other systems.
The anti-Alliance crews are working pretty hard.
Some people are framing the anti-Alliance attacks as being retaliation for ongoing work to Re-take Lave.
But the truth is that the anti-Alliance groups spotted an opportunity in Lave and have won massive popular support.
The “independence” of Lave Radio Network is being used as a front by groups running a much broader anti-Alliance campaign. Lave is a proxy war.
Even now that you can read for yourself what is going on, those groups have a lot of traction.
More information here:https://forums.frontier.co.uk/showthread.php/448327-Lave
imagine botting in a game with no trading and with minimal sandbox elements lol.
Maybe I’m an idiot (its been known) but I’m not getting your point.
This is my first MMO so I’ve got nothing to compare it to.
Are you saying that botting is usually done for personal wealth? Or are you saying that trade has very little BGS effect? Are you saying that the type of claim that a group has to systems their PMF governs is so “at arm’s length” that no one would do it?
Genuinely interested in your take on this.
Are you saying that botting is usually done for personal wealth?
Or are you saying that trade has very little BGS effect? Are you saying that the type of claim that a group has to systems their PMF governs is so “at arm’s length” that no one would do it?
You’ve been here for years, and I have no idea why.
Your constant presence on the forums seems to indicate some sort of seeking of validation through community, but you constantly rubbish everything is a shared communal asset. You put down anything that you can’t directly own by yourself.
Why are you even in this thread?
Groups care about the systems they hold collectively, as much as you do about your ships and bank balance.
Group’s claims to systems is no less real than your claim to ships. Or wealth. Or whatever virtual thing it is that you do actually care about.
Botting is a huge threat to the game and will be devastating to the community.
There are now 3 posts looking at the notion of “If they’re doing it - you should too”
In eight months time it will be irrelevant who did it first or who fired the first shot.
Everyone will have their eyes on GitHub and be tinkering with code and a couple of spare accounts.
The BGS will become a toxic wasteland.
The bots instance?
If someone was running a bot, they'd just do it in solo wouldn't they?
Groups care about the systems they hold collectively, as much as you do about your ships and bank balance.
Group’s claims to systems is no less real than your claim to ships. Or wealth. Or whatever virtual thing it is that you do actually care about.
Botting is a huge threat to the game and will be devastating to the community.
There are now 3 posts looking at the notion of “If they’re doing it - you should too”
In eight months time it will be irrelevant who did it first or who fired the first shot.
Everyone will have their eyes on GitHub and be tinkering with code and a couple of spare accounts.
The BGS will become a toxic wasteland.
Botting is a huge threat to the game and will be devastating to the community.
There are now 3 posts looking at the notion of “If they’re doing it - you should too”
In eight months time it will be irrelevant who did it first or who fired the first shot.
Everyone will have their eyes on GitHub and be tinkering with code and a couple of spare accounts.
The BGS will become a toxic wasteland.
You and I dont see eye to eye on a lot of things, but I agree wholeheartedly with what you've written here.
So now I've got an Alt account set up with a script running as much of the day as I can; getting screen grabs of traffic every half hour.
But it needs regular attending as the traffic report moves up and down in the menu.
If I want to run it 24/7 to get the "solid evidence" that Frontier say they want, then I will have to incorporate an OCR reader that can pass a variable back to the script.
That's do-able, but I don't really have the time to devote to that sort of thing. It challenges my critical thinking, and I have to do more than a quick google.
Still waiting for an answer as to how this would be “devestating to the community”.
It’s not like a change in management would suddenly render a system inaccessible, or cause ships of any super power to spontaneously explode, or otherwise cut off some venue of game play.
I get that some people have funny emotional attachments to their Player Named Factions they can’t actually join, and don’t actually belong to, but this isn’t really game play. It’s just mental (not in a seek help way).
I also get that there are rules, one of which is “Don’t do this”, but none of us are official, payrolled Rules Enforcers either.
So the actual effect on the community would not be devestating in any way. Some egos might get bruised, but that’s not game play either.
Isn't it weirdly perverse that to get the evidence of botting Frontier want, you have to run your own bot?