OK, and Jesus' Sermon on the mount can be seen to reference earlier scriptures, but I wouldn't ask you for an exact page number for the quote, rather elucidation of your meaning. It's like Sleutetbos: sometimes it's not so much what you're saying as how you're saying it. The bible is expansive, but I don't feel a need to ask people which version of the bible they're quoting, nor do I expect the gospel of Judas to be in a complete form when I read it in the Nag Hammadi. The reason I'm making "innacurate accusations" it precisely because I don't care to call out sections of the community when I only have problems with individuals, nor am I the type to keep logs of every IRC chat I've had like some people I've met. Do I care to talk about specifics in these cases? No, because it was different people ten to now, and neither deserve to know each other's business on some basic assumed principle of freedom of information.
Basically, to ask about my meaning directly would have been the way to approach the situation, not immediately asking me for a reference and implying I misunderstood the text. Now I don't care to sit here and compare spectacles as to Nitezche, as I was always more into Kierkegaard, and I'm not saying anyone's right or wrong, I'm just giving my opinion. The problem is people take my opinions personally, or read too much or too little into it. Again, I said I fly w/ Kumo and Black Omega 'cause of how they fly, I didn't pretend that Code tell you how to play. Most of the guys I've talked to in Code are cool, and in fact most of the people in ELITE I've talked to are cool, it's just there's a lot of people that seem caught up on hanging points which stop them seeing the bigger picture.