Call to Arms for a Free Colonia
- Thread starter Pristine_Bump
- Start date
Lekeno, I know what you're trying to do, and it's clever. It's a good strategy. But you see, I've done nothing wrong here.
*WITCH-HUNTS / MOB MENTALITY
We do not allow the use of any of our communications systems to be used for 'witch-hunts' or mob-mentality griefing that leads to targeted harassment. Pursuing such vendettas on our platform(s) or within our games, or attempting to organise such through Frontier channels, is not permitted.*
I would say bringing a whole faction 22.000ly just to try to kill of @Phisto Sobanii is a violation of this CoC. Wouldnt you agree @LeKeno
We do not allow the use of any of our communications systems to be used for 'witch-hunts' or mob-mentality griefing that leads to targeted harassment. Pursuing such vendettas on our platform(s) or within our games, or attempting to organise such through Frontier channels, is not permitted.*
I would say bringing a whole faction 22.000ly just to try to kill of @Phisto Sobanii is a violation of this CoC. Wouldnt you agree @LeKeno
This is no strategy at all. The fact that you think about it this ways speaks volume.
If you really want us to listen and engage, I suggest that you reflect on what you did.
Look, you said "Your people never had any intention of dealing with us, even before the leaks.", I only became aware of your side leaking confidential information in public in the recent days. After the first war, I was willing to listen to your side of the story in the ED BGS but then your other folks decided to trash talk everything, so that was the end of that. I was still interested in resuming the discussion but now, I'm not sure seeing how you think about things.
In your hastiness, it looks like you forgot to copy paste the whole section (highlighted the missing bit):
WITCH-HUNTS / MOB MENTALITY
We do not allow the use of any of our communications systems to be used for 'witch-hunts' or mob-mentality griefing that leads to targeted harassment. Pursuing such vendettas on our platform(s) or within our games, or attempting to organise such through Frontier channels, is not permitted.
(Note that this criterion relates to a distinct issue, separate from standard player/group conflicts and engagement within our games which is often an inherent aspect of multiplayer gaming.)
Noted. Thank you. I will consider your words and get back to you.
You're just upset we caught your spy so easily.
Are you aware of the leaks of 'your' side prior to that?
While we're on the subject, any comments on what your plans are once the shipyard changes hands and Colonia loses access to Federal and Alliance vessels? Or is the press conference not slated until later?
A Leader is only as good as their Word and you forfeited all consideration, when you joined with an oathbreaker in breaching the treaty they freely entered into , so I for one would never listen to anything you said and will lay waste to yours and you allies systems untill you have been seen by your people as the liability you are ,and deposed .
Last edited:
Gentlemen,
can I suggest you cool the temperature a bit. I'm sure there are good people on both sides. Otherwise all you achieve is more escalation.
Lekeno has given his views. Respect that as Isaiah has. You wanted to hear from them, now you have heard from Lekeno. Is your response really going to be to just
on what he has to say? Why should AAA say anything if that's all you're going to do?
can I suggest you cool the temperature a bit. I'm sure there are good people on both sides. Otherwise all you achieve is more escalation.
Lekeno has given his views. Respect that as Isaiah has. You wanted to hear from them, now you have heard from Lekeno. Is your response really going to be to just
on what he has to say? Why should AAA say anything if that's all you're going to do?So you do admit the travelling 22.000ly to kill one cmdr, bit. What about breaking the peace treaty, any comment? Any comment on alligations about the "army of peace", being actually an army of violence and oppression?
Easy, easy. Stay focused on the issue at hand, which is what happens if CIDE actually wins this war and succeeds in denying the nebula access to an important resource.
It is a war old chap and 3 consecutive might be thought by some to already qualify as "escalation"
Neither SPEAR nor most of the other participants in this war are parties to that treaty, are they?
Consider your responses, particularly when the comment you are responding to is made by an unknown... How easy it would be to be considered 'flaming' an innocent - even if said innocent may not be entirely so - just because a poster doesn't display where their sympathies lie is not an indication that they are neutral.
Take the diplomatic path... I, for one, would like to be giving some commentary, in my typical style, on the ongoing conflict, should anyone take the bait being offered that opportunity will be denied, which would make me sad
Take the diplomatic path... I, for one, would like to be giving some commentary, in my typical style, on the ongoing conflict, should anyone take the bait being offered that opportunity will be denied, which would make me sad
Consider your responses, particularly when the comment you are responding to is made by an unknown... How easy it would be to be considered 'flaming' an innocent - even if said innocent may not be entirely so - just because a poster doesn't display where their sympathies lie is not an indication that they are neutral.
Take the diplomatic path... I, for one, would like to be giving some commentary, in my typical style, on the ongoing conflict, should anyone take the bait being offered that opportunity will be denied, which would make me sad
Perfect timing because I'm reading through this and wondering who some of the players in this conflict are?
I know who The Nameless (and Loren's Reapers by association) and Explorer's Nation are but who or what is SPEAR? I've seen SEDC mentioned as well but don't know what that stands for.
agreed and duely ammended
I got confused for a moment between Kenco and Kancro
objectively for my world view they are the same thing though
"To show some cards which are already played anyways. Kancro and i are friends since the start of DW2 and we worked together for the whole event.
I was informed from him personally about colonia and the "truth" about the region and i will take his words. period.
i guess its obvious now, in view of the fact that Kancro is able to show presence in this campaign, how the "who" is related here.
and we are not finished... " From Trebor
Defend the dream of Colonia
Colonia is not just a system, not even a region, Colonia is an ideal, a dream, a place where humanity can be free, free from the superpowers, free from emperors, presidents or corporate tyranny. A place for all to live as equals not as the serfs of a few, this is our dream and this dream is...
Last edited:
SECD are Societas Eruditorum de Civitas Dei, the 'first learned' society of the city of god. They are a player faction.
I've no idea who the other one is.
Spear are a PvP group that role-play being cops...which goes a long way to explain why they are so hated by people that like playing the lawless side