First, Like i said before.. ' I knew that possible cz adult hippos are more stronger than nile crocs but we are talking about juvenile here and that every herds of animals always have 'the weak one' inside them including hippos.'
Even after they try best to protect it all the time, crocs are still potentially threat to them. So with your argument above, hippos and crocs should live separately but no, they still live side by side because nature have their own law and doesn't have to obey with your stupid law,
also for sure, you never seen crocs kill a baby hippos yet before and because you not seeing it yet, it doesn't mean that thing aren't there!
Second, Why not?? Why you can't make sea animals like shark as example for wild behaviors??? Did you know that all life in this world started from the bottom of the sea???, so in someway there is connection between land and sea creature.
and about Dolphin, that's one of example killing for territorial area. Not for food neither for fun.
Like my statement above about territory, 'The purpose are to split area to live and what i mean live here are area to eat, drink, breed, sleep, etc.
Although, in some case it work with different species, but mostly work with same species
and for sure,
not work with predator and prey relationship!'
Dolphins kill Porpoise because they treat Porpoise as threat to their environment especially for their food source. So get your fact straight!
Third, Now you compare Wild animals with domestic animals??? Really??
Even domesticated animals like cats are not killing for fun. They hunt mice and bird cz they have what i call it 'hunting instinct' on their blood from their ancestor and need to keep it to stay sharp.
Even with home cats, after you provide them with better food so they doesn't really need to hunt anymore but still, sometime they go out to hunt neither because they got bored with you or your pathetic food, but because they have instinct/ nature call to do it.
But mainly, you can't compare wild animals with domesticated animals. Why?? cz domesticated animals act like an hybrid dinos in JP lore. Sometimes they will not work properly like it used to be and this thing are common in domesticated animals.
For example, One of my cat choose to run and hide after some big bad mouse pass in front of him rather than chase and kill it or big dog who afraid with small cat and so on.
So you need to thing again about term of 'killing for fun'.
About wolf, i told you that as long as i can tell, i never seen any evidences or reports like that in the wild.
Tigers, LOL! man..im Indonesian (that's one of my excuses for my bad english cz it isn't my native language).
I live in country which had 3 different sub-species of tigers (Sumatran, Javanese, and balinese tiger. Only Sumatran tiger officially remained but personally i think Javanese are still exist too cz so many evidence about their existence in their nature preserve till now and i wish i can tell you the same about Balinese one but sadly, i can't.) and for sure, I have knowledge about them then you had. The territorial area of tigers not always 100 km, it depends on that area itself and how many tigers live inside it because territorial area like i said before, '
Territorial area isn't same with 'comfort zone'. It lot wider in range compare to 'comfort zone'. The purpose are to split area to live. Although, in some case it work with different species, but mostly work with same species and for sure, not work with predator and prey relationship!'
Yes, it take a lot time before you can spot tigers because of their wide range of territorial area but not just because tigers a solitary predator (not like their cousin in Africa) also they need to keep move from one spot to another inside their range to keep it clear from any other tigers (you can call it as a patrol) and for sure you can easy to spot their prey 'inside' their territorial if it have stable environment (Nature law, Prey always had a big number compare with their predators.).
In other hand, you don't take much time to spot a lion pride after you see African buffalo herd in Tanzania because mostly only male lions and not the whole pride, who do the patrol job on their territory.
Now you talk about Mapogo Lions, (the coalition of 6 ) Did you ever watch the documentary???
As long as i remember, there is no scene that show that lions kill entire herd of their prey inside their territory. They even not kill entire pride/coalition of other lion who came to challenge them over territory.
They become the largest pride after because they know what had to be done and if as you say '
KILLED everything even other lions and took over the largest territory', it will be impossible for them to become largest pride on Sabi sand if they continuously murder everything on sight.
Now, You got wrong about how their pride/ coalition actually ended.
Their coalition ended not because
They were kill each other (Where the hell this story coming from??!) but something else. Beside never call pride lions as herd!
Yes, once they got largest sector of territory but not for long, and yes there was fight between them (the infamous Mr. T with the oldest, Makhulu) which later ended by separated their pride and territory (Mr.T with Pretty Boy and Makhulu with the rest of Mapogo lions) but this is not how their coalition was ended. Their pride ended by other coalition.
And again, you wrong when you said '
They kill everything'. They don't kill everything but almost everything on their menu. there are differences at that terms. So you need re-watch and thing about it before you put it up here and become another false information.
Lastly, No one ever said the dinosaurs were hybrid, huh??
cz i seen it a lot from other threads in this forum who said all dinos in lore are hybrid (example : a lot ppl here think that Spino from movie was hybrid. No, she not!). So you may need to check it up once again.
