If there only were buildings in space or on a planet where I could park my ships for free… Hold on!I just want a place to store ships and some cargo without paying 5 billion for a fleet carrier plus regular upkeep.
If there only were buildings in space or on a planet where I could park my ships for free… Hold on!I just want a place to store ships and some cargo without paying 5 billion for a fleet carrier plus regular upkeep.
Maybe you've been playing for a while. After 9 years of playing I'm facing the problem that I have nowhere to put my credits. And I never really make a lot of money on purpose. They just accumulate and do not spend.I just want a place to store ships and some cargo without paying 5 billion for a fleet carrier plus regular upkeep.
A hauler with 2,000t of cargo space to fill up my carrier quicker would be nice.Bring forth the Panther Clipper to even the odds a bit![]()
That certainly seems to be their initial plan - and I can think of some complexities - detention centres, for example - which might make non-bubble colonies trickier.The answer they gave made me think they didn't really know exactly what they were answering. I don't think they specified it very well nor do I think they understood the question and it'd be nice if Frontier gave clarification. Does this mean that none of the deep space outposts outside of the bubble, none of the asteroid bases near nebulae, none of the systems of the colonia bridge, no systems from Colonia itself, etc... are eligible to start colonization from? Are none of them going to have a colonization contact?
They seemed very definite that systems were permanent. The "normally affected by the BGS" seems to imply that they could be targets of future Thargoid attacks, which could certainly be an extremely persistent state; equally, I suspect they're aware that most people setting up systems aren't going to be doing so because they want to make targets.Unless, and I could be reaching here, there were a Thargoid-based mechanism opposing this in some way...
... but if it could not "destroy" a system permanently by 'removing' the starports and thus require re-colonizing, which might not necessarily be welcomed by players (if that were a concern for Frontier), it would be of limited impact.
Depends what you count as "interesting". There'll be a bunch of ELWs and similar, but ultimately a lot of the fringe 10-30 LY on the inside of the bubble's surface is already sufficiently "uninteresting" - no engineers, no major Powerplay fights, poor outfitting, etc - that hardly anyone ever visits those systems. You'd automatically get Pristine reserves so setting up a bunch of refinery/industrial stations in systems with metallic rings is an obvious option but it's not as if there's a shortage of those on the existing fringes either ... and the more systems there are, the less likely they are to get the BGS states needed for profitable mining.People keep saying this but the outer layer of the bubble is a huge expanse. Are you absolutely sure there is nothing of interest 10-30 ly from that outer layer?
That's the easier way round: they just colonise a suitable number of intermediate systems.if the colonization range exceeds 30 ly, then how will PP 2.0 forces be able to get into these systems? The range of the base is 30 ly, and the fortified system is 20 ly
Nostromo?A hauler with 2,000t of cargo space to fill up my carrier quicker would be nice.
Isn't a beta but with permanent consequences not a beta?I wonder how differently the existing deployment of PP2.0 would have been received if described as a beta but with permanent consequences?
Why change it? We already have a non-changeable ID and a changeable name for our FCs. I think they will just add a second name and that's it.I wonder if colonisation may change systems names. Currently almost every inhabited system has a overcomplex generic name. It would be disappointing if "new mini-bubbles" take place but all of their new colonised systems still have boring and hard to remember names.
Frontier - There will be a beta period for testing and ironing out any kinks before the feature goes liveIsn't a beta but with permanent consequences not a beta?
Been a lot of expectations crashing I think, it's not base building, not that I wanted that, but that's what a lot of people were expecting/desiring. I really don't know what to think for myself, the base building/colonisaton bug has never bitten me so it's hard to be dissapointed about something that has literally no impact on me.
As long as we can use the second name in the galaxy map search bar, I'm fine with it.Why change it? We already have a non-changeable ID and a changeable name for our FCs. I think they will just add a second name and that's it.
For Powerplay, I'd love to know how many empty places there are in the core compared to the edges of the inhabited bubble, as it might allow fringe powers a way to expand while core powers have to fight.
Have my Face on some bilboards in the system.
You don´t need further clarification, it´s already in the text you quoted:I don't agree with this. Establishing a system should a lot more expensive than owning/leasing a fleet carrier. If a fleet carrier has weekly upkeep costs, then so should a system. If a system doesn't, then neither should a fleet carrier. By not having costs for a system, but have costs for a carrier, you are making unbalanced gameplay.
This is controversial. Frontier allow content creators early beta access and that is seen by some as unfair as it is. Now they are going to allow this favoured group to get an early jump on colonising systems first? Will LEP holders be part of this beta period, as specified in the description of the LEP? Another concern I have is that the beta period won't be long enough. It takes at least two weeks to colonise a system (one week to claim it, which it then recognises on the Thursday tick, and let's say someone has everything the system need to setup that initial station, it takes until the next tick to recognise it as a built station.) Are Frontier really going to implement changes in a beta period in what i guess will be four weeks?
EDIT: Apparently it's going to be an open beta. I await further clarification from Frontier on this.
So, a test in the live servers, that anyone can take part in, with permanent results.The "beta" it´s in the live servers, and all player can be a part, it´s just a test in the normal servers, with normal permanent gameplay.
I think that describes it pretty well. Frontier's vision of the new game mechanic isn't to let players fly out 10k lys to that one ELW they first discovered and start building there.Admittedly, I find myself a bit weirded out that there is no direct benefit outside of generating a new economy (but in the end that could lead to interesting trade options). However, I think it might be best if the narrative is shifted a bit to say you're sponsoring expansion and not buying claim rights to a system.