Yeah - except a plasma display doesn't have even close to the resolution of a 30" IPS nor is it of any use to me for photography as the colour reproduction doesn't have a shadow on a decent monitor. I've been gaming on my HP LP2475w for years and never suffered for it. 2560x1600 vs 1080p... I know which way I'd go. IPS panels output detail where there is detail, if there is none then it's black. If you get no detail then you've calibrated it wrong and all my screens are calibrated both for colour and exposure using a Spyder4Pro.
Woot?
Best displays for PCs you can buy (not in the experimental status) are IPS, precisely due to superior color accuracy. Aren't you confusing with the cheaper and faster TN displays?
Plasma is not a technology used in computer displays, only in TV. Fine for gaming, not general use.
As Asp Explorer says, if your board can handle it then at least go to 1866. 1866 does have marked performance improvements over 1600, I have tested them both on Ivybridge, and above that the performance improvements were really minimal. This may be different with Haswell though...
For a tenner you cannot go wrong, Haswell memory controllers are supporting up to 2800MHz and 1866 is really the new standard (as evidenced by the pricing): http://www.anandtech.com/show/7364/memory-scaling-on-haswell/10
This page above shows how slow RAM (1333, 1600) does actually affect FPS in some cases.
If you buy XMP RAM you don't even need to fiddle with its settings to get it to run at full speed.
Memory
4 x 1.5V DDR3 DIMM sockets supporting up to 32 GB of system memory
Due to a Windows 32-bit operating system limitation, when more than 4 GB of physical memory is installed, the actual memory size displayed will be less than the size of the physical memory installed.
Dual channel memory architecture
Support for DDR3 3000(O.C.) / 2933(O.C.) / 2800(O.C.) / 2666(O.C.) / 2600(O.C.) / 2500(O.C.) / 2400(O.C.) / 2200(O.C.) / 2133(O.C.) / 2000(O.C.) / 1866(O.C.) / 1800(O.C.) / 1600 / 1333 MHz memory modules
Support for non-ECC memory modules
Support for Extreme Memory Profile (XMP) memory modules
So the higher the better then, even if just for gaming. If that's the case I might as well put on the other few quid and get this:
http://www.ebuyer.com/611848-corsair-8gb-ddr3-2400mhz-vengeance-pro-kit-red-cmy8gx3m2a2400c11r
Assuming my chosen mobo can support it of course.
Edit:
I guess it can.
Any potential PSU issues with such fast RAM? 650w Corsair right now.
Edit: One other thing I'd like to get cleared up: if using dual screens, does that have much impact on the PSU?
@ Arbanax - If you have no previous experience of building, you might be interested in buying a 'Motherboard bundle' from somewhere like overclockers.co.uk or CCL computers. (I'm sure others do them too)
A motherboard bundle usually consists of the motherboard, CPU, CPU cooler, & memory, which the supplier has chosen for compatibility & will pre-build & test, so all you have to do is fit it into the case. Ready overclocked bundles are available if you want the performance hike. Prices are usually attractive, too.
Of course, you still have to choose your case, PSU, hard drive(s) etc, but that's the 'easy' part.
PM me if you'd like any advice.
PC Specialist are another option - prebuilt and built-to-spec. Their service/prices etc seem pretty good.Anyone recommend anyone else?
RAM energy consumption is negligible in current desktops compare to everything else. Going from 1600 1.5v to 2400 1.65v might add a couple of watts if that.
Dual screens impact on average system power consumption but not on peak, so there is no impact whatsoever on the PSU requirements.
Does anyone have any positive experiences with good OEM's. I've not heard brilliant things about Overclockers, and SCAN (some call them scam for that reason) also Chillblast got some negative press. But I think that might not be as bad as the other two. I'd heard some good noises about Novatech, also Dino computers seem to be positive. Anyone recommend anyone else?
Edit: One other thing I'd like to get cleared up: if using dual screens, does that have much impact on the PSU?
As another said, not on your PSU.
Stop. Before. You. Buy.
You want two screens, which is great. At work I love it. I can have lots of things open and see them all.
Where is the join?
It's in the middle, so any game you play will have the screens' bezels sitting right in the middle of the action.
The solution is easy - BUY THREE!
But that way lies madness. And bankruptcy. Actually more the last one.
Is there a way to find out how close to the PSU's ceiling your system is operating at? Thanks for the info about RAM.
Having two or more monitors is a big productivity jump. At modern resolutions it's easy to have two full-scale A4 documents on one, your e-mail on another, and The Ashes on a third.
I've been ignoring the third quite a bit lately.
Excel, or your spreadsheet programme of choice, is much, much better over massive screen real estate.
It works well if you are in game on one and need another programme on the other.
But, trust me, you'll think "hey, if I had Elite over both I could see more of my cockpit, I wonder if that would work..." then "that bezel is annoying, if I bought another monitor..."
Well. While configuring a system there are calculators available (a good one).
For measuring actual real life power consumption in a system you would need a specialized device, like kill-a-watt. There are also systems that can be used to load test PSUs, but AFAIK those are expensive stuff, not really needed for home user.
Thanks for that. Well according to the calculator, even my new setup will barely make my PSU break a sweat.
Your 650W corsair (very good PSUs, btw) is enough to deal with anything but quite extreme multiple GPU systems. For example it should suffice to handle a dual gtx 770 system with a Haswell CPU at stock.
Calibration won't make a bad display good. If a display cannot display a colour then it cannot and no amount of calibration can fix that. Resolution, what kind please clarify? 1080 or 4K or motion resolution. Motion resolution has always been a flaw of LCD screens period. When you talk about colour what do you mean colour-space, depth??? There are hardly any displays out there that can display 100% sRGB perish the the thought of xvYCC, Kodak ProPhoto RGB and deep-colour. So no IPS does not show what is there, there is no technology that can do that. LED/IPS LCD have always had the poorer blacks levels than plasma.
http://www.hdtvtest.co.uk/news/panasonic-tx-p55vt65b-201304212862.htm
I'd would be really interested in any LCD display bar OLED that can even get close to these black levels?
BTW my plasma has been calibrated by an ISF certified professional from http://www.soundstage.uk.com once it had bedded in. For my IPS LCD monitor I use a Gretag Macbeth/Pantone Huey I'm not Cartier-Bresson, Capa, Bailey, Lichfield, Adams...
I have been messing about with photography and video when you were still a twinkle in your dads eye![]()