Could someone please explain what the Upscaling using AMD FidelityFX CAS setting does?
- Thread starter Speccy
- Start date
I did what he did, but if I downgrade supersampling below 1, it's really bad. Like "hello 1998 bad" with blurry people, and pixel everywhere. Running 640*480 kind of bad. If I go below 0.65, the text in the menu is completely blurred.
Not close to what the have for the same value.
Then, when I use upscaling as he is, it's still looking the same, but with added weird "dot" effect on everything.
This is the comparison with the same value between him and me :
Me :
him :
him :
Mine looks good with:
supersampling: 0.75,
upscaling: AMD FidelityFX CAS enabled,
AMD Fidelity CAS Intensity: 50%
Wait a minute.. you have a 3090.. Why would you need CAS at all? You should be rendering at a higher resolution, not lower :O
Still super blurry, and the "lines" are all "broken", like the white and yellow lines above the direction, or the barrier on the left. I don't seems to have what he had on video.
Try it with .85 and the CAS slider just a tick from the left.
Under 0.85 i get the same artifacts as you.
Still the same artifacts, just less severe. And the FPS gain is minor at that point (5-10 in concourse).
I feel I missed something on the video he is using 0.65, yet it doesn't look that bad.
Thank you for your help though
Do you have AA enabled?Still the same artifacts, just less severe. And the FPS gain is minor at that point (5-10 in concourse).
I feel I missed something on the video he is using 0.65, yet it doesn't look that bad.
Thank you for your help though
I commend you for trying, but that's basically a placebo. This is not a proper good looking upscale. That would be indeed FSR, or DLSS 2.0 (Even 1.0 is iffy). And having to lower the internal renderer is really.. pathetic. There, I can't find a different word for it. For crying out loud, this is not exactly a high tech engine running ray-tracing, now is it.Still the same artifacts, just less severe. And the FPS gain is minor at that point (5-10 in concourse).
I feel I missed something on the video he is using 0.65, yet it doesn't look that bad.
Thank you for your help though
Yes it chugs along, but turning my 80-90 I had in Horizons into 30? Yeah, no thanks.
Well no I didn't.... Derp.
Thanks.
I mean it's not placebo, but it's bad, I know.
I'm not excusing them for what we have. I'd just like to play a bit before the end of 2021 or the beginning of 2022, you know^^
You are absolutely right that we should not have to do it.
But as long as we don't get performance fixes we have to do with what we have.
Because the game runs like sh*t....
I think I tried evochron years ago. Got a headache in the tutorial, didn't understood half of itEvochron Legacy SE is on sale right now
Everspace 2 is Early access, and I'm not a huge fan of playing a game before it's "complete". Maybe some day.
FidelityFX CAS is a sharpening filter. It is supposed to restore detail from blurring artefacts such as those produced by TAA or upscaling.
FidelityFX Super Sampler is an upscaler and a sharpening filter (in effect, it juste use CAS as sharpening filter).
Since ED include natively an upscaler, FDev just need to implement CAS to get the equivalent of Super Sampler.
FidelityFX Super Sampler is an upscaler and a sharpening filter (in effect, it juste use CAS as sharpening filter).
Since ED include natively an upscaler, FDev just need to implement CAS to get the equivalent of Super Sampler.
Check the AA option
Yes I did, solved the broken line issue. It's not pretty but I guess it works.
It is kinda funny. In ATS and ETS2 you upscale to 400% so you don't need AA, here you downscale and disable AA just so you can play.
Well... i hope players won't accept this kind of solution. It's just a no way for me.