One might assume there was no need to be specific with all the countless threads full of specifics...a 5 year old could probably work out the OP means the game needs to be fixed. While the original tone is a tad on the salty side, I find myself agreeing anyway. Your reply seems more about pedantics just fer the hell of it which is even less useful than you imagine it is.
Two weeks...thats pretty amateur actually...considering what was broke, one could be forgiven the surprise of wondering why a simple hotfix hasnt been released. Ive seen tiny dev teams on p2p games react faster than these guys.
So the question of the topic is not something anyone can answer (and FD won't answer it). This is a discussion forum and the op posted an unanswerable question for discussion. So this can result in one of two outcomes. Either it falls off the page or people discuss stuff.
It was a valid question. It actually got an answer. I'm not sure what the benefit of questioning the motivation for the question provides.
As I said above, the delay is a direct result of the community asking FD to avoid multiple micro patches following a major update. The next build is therefore going to take more time. More so because there are a fair few things that need addressing. Therefore, the next update should contain a sizeable change list.
And "2 weeks is pretty amateur really"?
No, it's taking as long as it needs to. Unless you know what FD are doing internally, how can you possibly measure whether it's amateur?