Nah, your system is too valuable to risk. There is one system I spotted not far from mine that's one sun - one asteroid field. I'll check if anyone claimed it.
"Development Level >>"? Figuring out what all these numbers do.
- Thread starter Ian Doncaster
- Start date
Nah, your system is too valuable to risk. There is one system I spotted not far from mine that's one sun - one asteroid field. I'll check if anyone claimed it.
Holy Crow! How awsome is this? That's my Coriolis!
What's the distance between stations? What an incredible sight!
31 km. I will keep track. I wonder if they stay together or move separately.
Spotted a good testing candidate. EDSM says it's unclaimed but can someone check it out? Don't have PC access right now alas.
Col 285 Sector FT-E b26-5
Col 285 Sector FT-E b26-5 is currently unclaimed and uninhabited. don't have the ship right now to get a system map view.
It has been pointed out already in another thread. It also appears even though it's adding slots it still takes a total build slot and may prove problematic long term other than just the bug aspect.
Thank you! It's a really weird system. Binary suns, 500K ls from each other. Both have an asteroid field but the first sun also has a landable ice planet.
Perfect testbed.
He is docked at the orbital construction platform in that picture, which will disappear after completion of the station ^^Fastest trade loop in the galaxy lol
I've heard that before, the one for my satellite stuck around for nearly two weeks after it was completed.
This is excellent. I'd love to see more system spreadsheets / workbooks from anyone who has them, though I understand they may be sensitive about sharing.
I mainly need to work out how to plan a system using the workbook.
Can confirm this affects T3 Surface ports as I have one, I can sell you lots of 3 things and at like a 10th of gal average but I hope this gets fixed sooner rather than later!
According to DaftMav's workbook, population should be 21,000 on my system, but it has reached 22,300 according to the Gal Map.
There's at least some randomness [1] in the population levels, at least on the bigger things.
My initial Vulcan Industrial had a population of 5,500, for example; and it doesn't seem to be accounting for any population at the small extraction settlement either (which should be non-zero, even if it won't be more than a couple of hundred)
[1] May not be actually random, but probably entirely safe to treat as such.
At another system, the population on the Gal Map is 11,100, and the spreadsheet goes for 12,000, so I wonder if the small mining installation should be 100 rather than 1000 pop addition.
Though this one (my very first system) "should" be 10,000 but is only actually 5000:
Not that it really matters. I need to know more what DaftMav's "dependencies" column on the installation types stats page is for (prerequisites, orbital types needed to make surface types "work"/have the right economy?)... as I want to start building a tourist/agriculture system.
Last edited:
Planning on building a Coriolis or larger in my system at some point. Question is (see red highlights), does it make sense to put it nearer the star and have 3 refineries / extraction sites feeding it or might that slot between moons essentially be able to pick up 2 slots from either planet? From what I've read I think that second site would only pick up from the moon on it's left and the one on the right isn't given any orbital slots?
Welcome to the Glisten Belt System from Traveller.This is insane! It means that systems with just one sun and one asteroid field are actually viable
I would rather asteroid belts stop being restricted from having ports/installations other than asteroid stations placed in them, unless there is an actual technical reason for that (but so far the presence of said bug indicates there isn’t, at least visibly).
… on the note of system statistics, is there any particular point in pursuing standard of living over, say, tech level? Mostly a planning question for my current refinery project to decide whether I should build more comms installations instead of satellites for T2 build points.
Also, say I build a colony orbital outpost which converts to industrial. Will it then also assist in the conversion of a later placed Coriolis or is the game going to ‘remember’ it was/is a civilian/commercial outpost which picked up another economy and act accordingly?
… on the note of system statistics, is there any particular point in pursuing standard of living over, say, tech level? Mostly a planning question for my current refinery project to decide whether I should build more comms installations instead of satellites for T2 build points.
Also, say I build a colony orbital outpost which converts to industrial. Will it then also assist in the conversion of a later placed Coriolis or is the game going to ‘remember’ it was/is a civilian/commercial outpost which picked up another economy and act accordingly?