I'd prefer a habitat option and I would tend to agree that, from what I can understand, flighted birds would technically be possible in the current variation of the game...Genuine Question:
Who else here would also be extremly annoyed if we get flying birds lets say macaws but inside of the WE without any changes to it and instead just like the sloths a prebuild climbing frame as their seating area that they would flutter between?
Im not saying WE birds cant work and id even admit that for smaller more active birds like songbirds it might be the best option, but a macaw, owl, eagle, vulture, whatever wont be moving most of the time. In fact most of the time they would be sitting and just fly to get from one seat to the next. And if those seats and the size and the whole fact that its a forced walkthrough are still just as unflexible and forced upon us as they are rn that would be such a dissappointment.
Cause like hands up we genuinly likes using the sloth? To place down a 8 meter long straight path, no terrain variation cause path, forced walkthrough, no variable climbing frame (that doesnt even look decent, not even mentioning good) and all that for an animal that barely moves.
I certanly dont and i have build for sloths in my zoo, they are just asleep all the time because a faux sloth climbing frame and sleep box are infinititly more entertaining to build then to work around the very rigid and limiting WE. And even if we get the miracle 5 different macaws, if they are still in that horrible box i doubt id use them
But if we got a WTE option for parrots and, say, some new non-walkthrough exhibit type for owls, eagles, or whatever? I'd be fine with that. Because I'd assume that habitat birds were never on the table if that's how they implemented them. And I'd rather have that than no birds at all. I'm sure I would use them... Though I'd wish they were implemented alternately, I've managed to get over it with the case of the bats, butterflies, and sloths. So that wouldn't be any different.