EDO Update9: how is your performance?
- Thread starter Ian Skippy
- Start date
Viajero
Volunteer Moderator
min of 50 fps at settlements with an 1080Ti? That must be some strong voodoo magic!
While that power plan is active you overexert somewhat your CPU. That an issue?
Last edited:
I tried Process Lasso once and it didn't appear to make any difference to frame rates, or CPU temps, as the CPU was at it's highest frequency almost all the time anyway.
My i7 4790k / GTX 1080 seems to manage about 40fps in settlements at 2k resolution, which seems consistent with RyuStaar, considering that a 5600x will push the GPU to its limit.
The thing about PC hardware too (especially Windows) if you don't properly install your chipset/drivers I believe you can negatively impact your system. I'm the type of guy that constantly optimizes his PC betweenbios updates, chipset updates, only have the single set of newest drivers (driverbooster , though somewhat malware-y, if you pay for it is a God send). I look online for custom curves on PBO2 which actually recommends an under volt that's why I'm not worried about.
To top it off, I have matched the best speed RAM with a 1:1 Infinity Fabric ratio, supposedly gives the ryzen a small performance boost. I'm kind of psycho about it honestly lol
While you are not wrong, the amount of negative impact that improper BIOS and chipset installation would cause is nowhere close to the severity of performance issues Odyssey is seeing.
Not for me, or it least not working well enough to even get to that point where it becomes a limiting factor. Something weird with the game not using my hardware with SLI, with it being technically supported and implemented, but not working and maintained. It's like it's set Vsync to 30~35 FPS, in effect, just with stuttering and poor performance all around. I don't mean that that's what it's done, just that in effect it's kind of like that for whatever reason.
Last edited:
You are correct, but still of all the parts added together? I dunno.
All I can say is Odyssey runs acceptable from my perception, though everyone's perception is different.
They do need to keep fixing/improving, though for sure
It's a common misconception that a negative value in the curve optimizer is automatically tantamount to undervolting a Zen 3 CPU. What it's actually doing is skewing the whole frequency/voltage curve, and, barring other limits (such as TDC/EDC or PPT constrains, or a manual global negative vcore offset or fixed voltage) that would constrain boost behavior, is normally going to result in higher boost clocks at the same voltage, rather than a reduction in voltage.
Matching FCLK (fabric, the interconnect between chiplets and components within them), UCLK (memory controller), and MCLK (memory I/O) does reduce latency vs. running them unsynchronized, all other things being equal. Sufficiently fast memory can overcome that penalty, but only at extremes that are hard to achieve on most parts.
The FPS is still suffering in big settlements with fire. It drops below 15 FPS for my config:
i7-4770k@4.2GHz, GTX 1080, 32GB RAM
In other settlements it's around 40FPS at high-mid graphics settings, 2K and 1.25 SSAA
The only significant improvements I can see is inside station docks (around 50-60FPS).
i7-4770k@4.2GHz, GTX 1080, 32GB RAM
In other settlements it's around 40FPS at high-mid graphics settings, 2K and 1.25 SSAA
The only significant improvements I can see is inside station docks (around 50-60FPS).
Lower SSAA to 1.0, 1080 is 5 year old you cant run odysssey at 2k 1.25 ssaa its way more complex then horizons and vanilla game was. And its dx11 so its brute forcing (no dx12 or vulkan optimizations)
Currently, on my nearly eight year old computer, I'm getting about 38-45 FPS on foot in settlements at medium graphics, 24-30 FPS at high graphics, and it's almost playable in VR at low graphics.
Almost.
GTX 980, i7-4770k, 16GB RAM, 1440p
Almost.
GTX 980, i7-4770k, 16GB RAM, 1440p
What headset? My Rift CV1 is horrible at low setting, and I normally use 1.25SS in horizons just to read the text more easily.
Odyssey is ok now in space, even CZs in VR at high.
I7 4790k / 16GB / GTX1080
HTC Vive.
everything on low settings and it still lag in Footfall CZ. normal space is fine. Planet landing is also fine.
intel i5-7900k - 3.8 ghz
ram: 32gb
graphics: gtx 1060 gtx
footfall also notice that when i drop out of ship there no booster pack to slow my descent. profile scanner works on dead soliders.
also seems to be a lag on the keyboard to foot solider commands. i move forward,game pauses thinks and 2 secs later action done.these happens for at least 10 secs on arrival on any CZ footfall mini game.
but last time i land in normal stations, i couldn't scan anyone from the security to the npc's?
intel i5-7900k - 3.8 ghz
ram: 32gb
graphics: gtx 1060 gtx
footfall also notice that when i drop out of ship there no booster pack to slow my descent. profile scanner works on dead soliders.
also seems to be a lag on the keyboard to foot solider commands. i move forward,game pauses thinks and 2 secs later action done.these happens for at least 10 secs on arrival on any CZ footfall mini game.
but last time i land in normal stations, i couldn't scan anyone from the security to the npc's?
I have r5 3600, RTX 2070S, 16 Gb RAM.
I play on 1920x1080 resolution and high-medium quality and there is no stability, especially on foot.
One time I have 60 FPS on a station (I use VS), other time I have 45 FPS on the same station. Magic!
Changing quality no have solid effect, and this is another type of magic, lol.
VR still for Horizon only.
I play on 1920x1080 resolution and high-medium quality and there is no stability, especially on foot.
One time I have 60 FPS on a station (I use VS), other time I have 45 FPS on the same station. Magic!
Changing quality no have solid effect, and this is another type of magic, lol.
VR still for Horizon only.
comparing my 1080p setup and vr between horizon in empty space vs Odyssey at same quality settings (low/ultra and low vr in vr)
Odyssey is almost exactly 50% the performance of horizons across all quality settings in both monitor and vr.
and there is literally nothing on screen except skybox background and my anaconda.
i saw no real difference between update 8 and 9. but i didn't test foot stuff.
Odyssey after over half a year is still a 50% performance penalty.
Odyssey is almost exactly 50% the performance of horizons across all quality settings in both monitor and vr.
and there is literally nothing on screen except skybox background and my anaconda.
i saw no real difference between update 8 and 9. but i didn't test foot stuff.
Odyssey after over half a year is still a 50% performance penalty.
For me it's roughly an 87% performance hit from Horizons.