ANNOUNCEMENT Elite Dangerous Community Team AMA

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Out of hundreds of questions, i don't recall reading a single actual answer that provided any sort of new info.
The second question answered had new info, I think (or at least, I'd not seen this mentioned elsewhere before, and it has huge implications!): https://forums.frontier.co.uk/threa...bruce-stephen-paul.559345/page-2#post-8814663

A rare confirmation here that a post-Odyssey feature is on the list: https://forums.frontier.co.uk/threa...bruce-stephen-paul.559345/page-4#post-8814720
(oddly, other questions in this area got a "no current plans, focus is on Odyssey", which may make clearer what "no current plans" means)

Helmets in Odyssey have a HUD: https://forums.frontier.co.uk/threa...bruce-stephen-paul.559345/page-6#post-8814793

Confirmation that they aren't happy with material balance: https://forums.frontier.co.uk/threa...bruce-stephen-paul.559345/page-8#post-8814857 and https://forums.frontier.co.uk/threa...ruce-stephen-paul.559345/page-11#post-8814950

Plus a few clarifications on lore issues, where it wouldn't give away future content. Whether that strictly counts as "new info" I don't know, but they certainly were useful answers.

Not much point having an AMA if you can't actually give out any new information. A few more AMAs like this and i suspect people will be telling you not to bother.
Possibly after a few of them we'll get better at asking questions they're allowed to give a useful answer to - I can certainly see some areas worth asking about next time, based on what they could talk about this time.
 
I had a question answered ... sort of ...

1606343904783.png


Now, "that's a great question!" can be taken two ways:
1. It's a great question :whistle:
2. "Crikey! We hadn't thought of that! "

But, we kind of got an answer that there will be "customisation" for Odyssey, even if we don't know the details :) So I took that as a satisfactory answer within the limitations of no Odyssey reveals allowed.
 
Well, i just read through the dev posts, and while i think the AMA in general is a good idea, the answers can basically be summarized as:
......
2) Nice idea, will pass it on (ok, suggestions are nice, but i thought this was an AMA, not a suggestion shoutbox!)
.....
There is comfort in knowing that your comment or idea is getting passed on for consideration, rather than shunted by mods into the empty void of the Suggestions thread :)
 
There is comfort in knowing that your comment or idea is getting passed on for consideration, rather than shunted by mods into the empty void of the Suggestions thread :)

The problem being, if you assume the suggestion subforum is an empty void, that the devs don't pay any attention, why would you feel any sort of assurance the devs would pay any attention to the suggestions the CMs say they will pass on to the devs.

You don't need an AMA to gather suggestions, people post in the suggestion sub-forum often enough to gather all the suggestions you could possibly need.
 
look at them again

Why? Do you think the answers will magically change if i look at them again?

If you have an answer that conflicts with my point of view, by all means, quote it.

Over on reddit Stuart noted that FD had given some new info in that this week had set a new record for player numbers. Ok, but its only official confirmation of something i think we all could have guessed anyway. Making games free tends to do that sort of thing.
 
If you have an answer that conflicts with my point of view, by all means, quote it.
I will not enter into discussion because English is not my native language,
there are many responses that do not respect your described pattern,
those responses that do not respect the pattern, even if they do not answer, are answered indirectly.

I give you an example
grinning_crow said:
Is the HIP 22460 Permit currently achievable in game?
The galaxy is vast and has many mystery CMDR.

Compare it with RAXXLA's response and obtain your conclusions (I imagine what they are: :mad:).

but the result seems to me to be positive and I encourage them to continue, for sure they will get more response next time. (y)
 
I will not enter into discussion because English is not my native language,
there are many responses that do not respect your described pattern,
those responses that do not respect the pattern, even if they do not answer, are answered indirectly.

I give you an example


Compare it with RAXXLA's response and obtain your conclusions (I imagine what they are: :mad:).

but the result seems to me to be positive and I encourage them to continue, for sure they will get more response next time. (y)

That was basically a non-answer.
 
The problem being, if you assume the suggestion subforum is an empty void, that the devs don't pay any attention, why would you feel any sort of assurance the devs would pay any attention to the suggestions the CMs say they will pass on to the devs.

You don't need an AMA to gather suggestions, people post in the suggestion sub-forum often enough to gather all the suggestions you could possibly need.
Could the new regular AMAs be another element in the 'we're lovely people, please buy Odyssey' thrust? The test will be whether all this flurry of activity lasts beyond 2021, past experience suggests that Frontier will return to a community engagement lockdown.
 
Could the new regular AMAs be another element in the 'we're lovely people, please buy Odyssey' thrust? The test will be whether all this flurry of activity lasts beyond 2021, past experience suggests that Frontier will return to a community engagement lockdown.

Maybe, but for them to have a positive impact FD's management really have to throw us a bone, give the CMs a little more permission to give real answers to questions. Sure, i accept they can't answer everything. A lot of stuff will have to be kept under wraps, but i'm fairly sure they could have at least answered a few of those with actual new information without breaking any obligations they have to shareholders and whatnot.

Would it really have hurt to have said "Yes, Raxxla is in game and reachable".

It makes me wonder whether the actual answer to that question is "No".
 
Maybe, but for them to have a positive impact FD's management really have to throw us a bone, give the CMs a little more permission to give real answers to questions. Sure, i accept they can't answer everything. A lot of stuff will have to be kept under wraps, but i'm fairly sure they could have at least answered a few of those with actual new information without breaking any obligations they have to shareholders and whatnot.

Would it really have hurt to have said "Yes, Raxxla is in game and reachable".

It makes me wonder whether the actual answer to that question is "No".

To be honest, the sanest default is 'no'. Realistically the CMs have some authority and leverage regards superficial balancing and act as an interface but beyond that its dev territory.
 
To be honest, the sanest default is 'no'. Realistically the CMs have some authority and leverage regards superficial balancing and act as an interface but beyond that its dev territory.

Well, one of the positive outcomes of a no answer is knowing when its a waste of time pushing further on a topic.

For example, their answer to your question about powerplay basically should indicate you might as well give up making proposals for a good while. Yes, they said they are interested in improving things, but the overall answer basically said, forget about anything happening with powerplay for the forseeable future.

At least, that's my take on the answer.
 
Well, one of the positive outcomes of a no answer is knowing when its a waste of time pushing further on a topic.

For example, their answer to your question about powerplay basically should indicate you might as well give up making proposals for a good while. Yes, they said they are interested in improving things, but the overall answer basically said, forget about anything happening with powerplay for the forseeable future.

At least, that's my take on the answer.

My take reading between the lines is that Powerplay is either too complex to fix, and is not a priority. It (along with CQC) is vestigial and the BGS is 'the thing'. Yes PP is in EDO (you can see it on one of the dev video 2 screens) but I expect nothing new now.

Its why I put the jab in about Sandro, because I have never heard another dev even say Powerplay once in years- at all. Its why I also asked about Powerplay bobbleheads and 3D Tier 1 avatars to match faction heads, at one time FD were pushing PP hard and suddenly dropped everything. So expect to look at 5 year old assets rather than the new emotive avatars.

Its a sad situation, because it exemplified FDs biggest weakness of making a feature and expecting it to be good 'because'. Powerplay could have (and still could be) good if only FD updated it more often rather than monolithically dropping it in the game and leaving updates for a future time.
 
Possibly after a few of them we'll get better at asking questions they're allowed to give a useful answer to
I thought I'd give them an easy one to answer, I asked "What can you tell us about Dev Diary 3? Any date yet?"
And Bruce replied "It's coming this December!"

I mean, I could not have given them an easier question to answer, and they didn't even give us anything on that. We know it's coming in December, they had a chance there to throw us something to keep us hyped while waiting, and Bruce went with "it's coming in December"

I don't see how I could have asked it any better, it's not like I asked something knowing full well they couldn't answer it. I even worded it in a way that gave them freedom to give us something.
 
I thought I'd give them an easy one to answer, I asked "What can you tell us about Dev Diary 3? Any date yet?"
And Bruce replied "It's coming this December!"

I mean, I could not have given them an easier question to answer, and they didn't even give us anything on that. We know it's coming in December, they had a chance there to throw us something to keep us hyped while waiting, and Bruce went with "it's coming in December"

I don't see how I could have asked it any better, it's not like I asked something knowing full well they couldn't answer it. I even worded it in a way that gave them freedom to give us something.

I feel as though if we had asked "Is water wet" the anwser would have been "Its a great question, and we will pass it on to the devs to look into"

Again, i don't want to dump on the CMs themselves, i understand they are trying to increase community engagement, but i feel like their hands are too tied to make this work.
 
I feel as though if we had asked "Is water wet" the anwser would have been "Its a great question, and we will pass it on to the devs to look into"
The CMs always say that they tell us what they can - so if you have been paying attention to what they say then all you will hear is the same again. Which is what happened.

The AMAs will maybe be more useful when there is news to query, rather than people screaming questions about VR into the void for weeks to get a simple clarification.
 
The CMs always say that they tell us what they can - so if you have been paying attention to what they say then all you will hear is the same again. Which is what happened.

The AMAs will maybe be more useful when there is news to query, rather than people screaming questions about VR into the void for weeks to get a simple clarification.

Then what is the point of doing an AMA if they can't say anything?
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom