Elite Dangerous, confirmed but not yet implemented features from 2013

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
NOOZ

It's pronounced nooz.

Fake nooz.

Good digging going on there though.

I was around from the start. The good old days - extensive alpha testing, a fantastic community vibe, so much opportunity for the future.

And look at what we got.

Isn't space BRILLIANT!

Looking forward to the ship interiors update <sniggers>
No nooz is good news!

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TM0sXkxyK5c
 
Any plan or idea that changed over time was originally fake news?

Usually "Fake News" refers to deliberate misinformation. Should I also mention what "Click Bait" usually refers to?
It's easier to swindle a man than to convince him he has been swindled.
I was going to eat some scrambled eggs this morning, but then I never did.
Did you announce it to the world? Did you invite friends and relatives to a scrambled egg breakfast? Did you charge money for it? If not, irrelevant.
We have modding. Graphical modding only of course, but that's still modding.

We have the ability to walk around outside our ships.

We have the ability to let other players inside our ships.

We have the ability to board SLFs onto our ships.

We don't have cloud cities yet.

4/5 isn't bad.
Graphical modding is not "giving players the chance to author their own scenarios and missions, or create completely new content.
 
Any plan or idea that changed over time was originally fake news?

Usually "Fake News" refers to deliberate misinformation. Should I also mention what "Click Bait" usually refers to?
Thats why I said ""fake news"" also it's only As much of click bait as saying something is planned and after a lot of wasted time saying it never was
 
Thats why I said ""fake news"" also it's only As much of click bait as saying something is planned and after a lot of wasted time saying it never was
Please site evidence that Frontier published plans in 2013 included intentional dishonest information. Representitives of Frontier knowingly making false statements with the intention of deceiving the public.

Without including this in your OP your statement of "Fake News" is the fake news, and simply click bait to gain attention.
 
Please site evidence that Frontier published plans in 2013 included intentional dishonest information. Representitives of Frontier knowingly making false statements with the intention of deceiving the public.

Without including this in your OP your statement of "Fake News" is the fake news, and simply click bait to gain attention.
Yes I want attention, but only frontier's
 
Perhaps. I certainly do not feel swindled by Frontier. I feel I have gotten value out of the game.

Are you trying to convince me I was swindled by Frontier into spending <$100 for a game that I played for 5 years? I was tricked?
Yes. They promised you
  • mods, creating your own scenarios and missions
  • space legs with diverse and interesting interiors for ships and stations
  • cloud cities and mining outpost
You got none of that but don't feel swindled, proving my point.
 
Yes. They promised you
I purchased a game in 2018. I have played it for 5 years. I was not swindled.

The OP is claiming Frontier knowingly made false statements in 2013 the form of "fake news". If the Original Post included evidence that the statements made in 2013 was intentional "fake news" then that should be included in the post. Otherwise it is a misleading garbage post.
 
Last edited:
Posting claims without any evidence is

I purchased a game in 2018. I have played it for 5 years. I was not swindled.

The OP is claiming Frontier knowingly made false statements in 2013 the form of "fake news". If the Original Post included evidence that the statements made in 2013 was intentional "fake news" then that should be included in the post. Otherwise it is a misleading garbage post.
So is it your claim that incompetence would let them off the hook?
"Misleading garbage post." Are you describing Fdev's promisses? Or the audacity to remind them of their unkept promises. I'm worried that you mean the latter.
 
Can I change the title of the post somehow or should I delete it complitely cause I see some people dont really like it
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom