[video=youtube_share;xjlgUx7_aN0]https://youtu.be/xjlgUx7_aN0[/video]
Elite Dangerous is the Largest Empty Sandbox Ever Made
- Thread starter Cosmo
- Start date
- Status
[video=youtube_share;xjlgUx7_aN0]https://youtu.be/xjlgUx7_aN0[/video]
Another way of looking at it is is that if the same feedback being made five years ago is being made today, and yet the game is not only successful but becoming even more so, the feedback was wrong then and is wrong now. Or, if not wrong, then not entirely relevant.
I can keep posting that I'd like it to be Eve without the subscription, but it doesn't matter how many times I post it, it's not going to happen.
and "full" at this point means "also here's Beyond throughout the whole of 2019, plus any unforeseen bugs / horror shows at rollout". the bafflement and frustration is to be expected.
Goose4291
Banned
The part where the moderator on the first page took everyone off-topic about tinfoil hats and continued to try to do so throughout the thread.
Ozric
Volunteer Moderator
If you have an issue with moderation then take it up with Brett, posting in threads is not the way to do it!
OK well thanks for clearing that up. Though it is still that many votes agreeing with just a post.
It's not that other people can't see the problems of the game, it's just that they have different solutions for it.
In other news, a local politician claiming that stuff sucks and should be better got 2000 votes. Definitive proof that stuff sucks and needs to be better.
Give two scrolls up to your mousewheel and read the comments
I think that is the most frustrating part for some. Its one thing to not get your dream game, but to see the company who didnt deliver your dream game florish and prosper is to some adding insult to injury. Its like discussing where to go, and people vote for a different party then you would have liked. And when you arrive, it turns out its not only as stupid as you thought, but the people at the party are having fun.
Give two scrolls up to your mousewheel and read the comments
You misunderstand, but that is okay.
Must get the house in order, football is on tonight, so cant get too involved today.I think that is the most frustrating part for some. Its one thing to not get your dream game, but to see the company who didnt deliver your dream game florish and prosper is to some adding insult to injury. Its like discussing where to go, and people vote for a different party then you would have liked. And when you arrive, it turns out its not only as stupid as you thought, but the people at the party are having fun.
How very dare they!
I think maybe everyone should take a breath here, if you don't the thread will just end up locked anyway.
Most people seem to agree that season 2 had.. issues.. with what it delivered. Likely they've tried to do too much and it bit them. Season 3 seems to go some way to understanding a large amount of the compaints that people have (ie QoL and the core game needs some development and depth).
We can all talk about what we'd like to see in the future while being polite to each other.
Most people seem to agree that season 2 had.. issues.. with what it delivered. Likely they've tried to do too much and it bit them. Season 3 seems to go some way to understanding a large amount of the compaints that people have (ie QoL and the core game needs some development and depth).
We can all talk about what we'd like to see in the future while being polite to each other.
He's trying to be reasonable! GET HIM!
Where do you see the game is successful and/or becoming more so?
I ask because what I see is a team floundering in bad code or poor design, having to clean up their own mess as they move away from two years of a season that under-delivered into a year of updates to the core gameplay which are sorely needed (and widely called for by the community).
Completely agree with the OP.
It's selling well.
That's pretty much all that matters.
Oddly I don't disagree (entirely) with your last part. I think 2.x was a serious mis-step (I personally blame MultiCrew), but ultimately it is what it is and they'll do what they feel they need to.
I miss him and that show. Was always my favorite of the troupe.
Other than making a few small available adjustments to parts of 2.4 I doubt there's much that would change its overall arc. The idea that 8 months or more of dev time can be changed on a whim is just not going to happen. As I said earlier, I don't have a problem with the story-line, but it's way too stretched out in terms of a narrative that sits alongside it. The end result is there's an alien species but it appears most of the galaxy isn't particularly fussed. It leaves the whole thing feeling a little empty. Had they had dozens of Galnet articles and published them each day it would/could have made the whole experience much more alive. The other choice was to run all this within a matter of a few short weeks, not spread over more time.
I still think that when the main course arrives it will probably be very good, but whether it will wait til just before Christmas I dont know
The issue here, is that what cosmo wants may not be what a lot of others who play the game want. It may be detrimental to their own in-game experience. I have seen Cosmos list and to me it looks like he wants X-series corporations that are controlled by player groups. Which will destroy the game for me and a lot of others.
So instead of just thinking about what you want, maybe try to think of stuff that will improve the game for everyone instead or stuff that wont cause issues for other players that don't want that kind of gameplay.
- Status