Well, that doesn't change the situation at the moment.Not true, many folks are not linked to third party sites, Inara shows the data only for registered and linked commanders.
O7
Well, that doesn't change the situation at the moment.Not true, many folks are not linked to third party sites, Inara shows the data only for registered and linked commanders.
O7
Example:View attachment 421485 maybe there are more than two of them.
yes, so much yes - but if someone claims a system only to block another players progress, that IMHO is either System-ganking or galactic politics.I might be missing something here
If someone else takes a daisy-chain system and starts a colonisation build it might be more efficient to help them than build 3-5 systems of your own
If they don't kick off a build doesn't their colonisation permit expire after 4 weeks so you get another chance to colonise it yourself. Is there much of this going on?
Does it? If I select a system in Inara it shows e.g. 5 commanders passed through in the last 24 hours. Doesn't mean they are still there or logged in, or other commanders who don't use Inara aren't there. I can also set my location to that system even if I'm not thereOn the Inara website, you can see if there is anyone else besides you in this system at the moment. I didn't think much of it at the time, which turned out to be stupid. I had to bypass the system to get to the end point, and I can already see that there is someone else there besides me.
Feel free to share or PM your current chain build. I am about 80% complete on a Coriolis started yesterday and happy to help a good cause once doneSo lets see if a solo Cdr can beat an Influencer-Group to it![]()
I would say one thing on this topic of System Sniping, how does the original poster know that they where waiting to specifically "steal" the system from them. Whilst the Grand Pause was in effect I was jumping around looking for systems, I don't know when looking if the system within range is part of a daisy chain or is a Cmdr just wanting one system to build up, really its impossible to know the intentions of said Cmdr without getting in contact \o/. How does the original poster know that they didn't interrupt someone else's chain...well, if you plan (like me) to establish an autonomous "2nd Bubble" some 850 Ly away you very much are forced to daisy-chain there. So with the short claiming distance given, such behaviour may force you to build another 3-5 systems around a 20 Ly gap if your only bridging system is blocked that way. I can understand the frustration.
But unfortunatly such asocial behaviour has become more and more common in online games.....
edit: btw - that chain also is needed for economic connection to the bubble markets, one reason for current distance limitations i guess
thanks for the offer mate, but if I need help I first ask my folks of my PMF - at least they should be interested as I am expanding their spaceFeel free to share or PM your current chain build. I am about 80% complete on a Coriolis started yesterday and happy to help a good cause once done
Amended that for youSo lets see if a solo Cdr can beat anInfluencerSales Rep without a Vauxhall Vectra -Group to it
Does it? If I select a system in Inara it shows e.g. 5 commanders passed through in the last 24 hours. Doesn't mean they are still there or logged in, or other commanders who don't use Inara aren't there. I can also set my location to that system even if I'm not there
(oh and having refreshed my browser I see much of this has already been covered)
Besides, it still boils down to a race for 'desirable' systems with no pre-emptive right
yep, the thing is I even don´t have a specific target system there yet....but I do understand there are people who want to go out thousands of lys to specifically get to one system which is fine but as with everything in life nothing is guaranteed. Anyways well done if you've got lt to the end of my waffle happy designing o7 and out.......
I can see your reasoning at the mo I'm on the edge of the bubble not many peeps around me but can imagine in a few years I maybe surrounded lolyep, the thing is I even don´t have a specific target system there yet.
We (our PMF) want to establish our own bubble -and stay as an Independent Faction. So we get out of the way of PP (at least temporary) as it is foreseeable that in 2 years or so there will be nomore Independent space, as the Independents can´t counter PP mechs - we have no PP Power.....
thanks mate - mini? By bubble standards maybe, but we are planning 30-50 Systems fullscale developement.I can see your reasoning at the mo I'm on the edge of the bubble not many peeps around me but can imagine in a few years I maybe surrounded lol. I wish you luck and fair travels it's a noble reasoning. Tbh I wouldn't mind doing that someday but for the moment don't fully understand how all the buildings Interact with the economy don't understand much tbf lol, but I do like like the idea of a chain of small systems eventually leading out to a mini bubble. It will mean there will be a lot more variety out there as said before good luck and happy surveying o7
The time is several hours ahead of current game time and a lot of colonisation will be on the boundary of populated systems so your point above eludes me. Anyway, best wishes reaching your objectivepay attention to the date and time. I'm on the edge of populated systems. And it seems to me that I am being followed.![]()
Colonisation will always be bound to a certain range, because logical you need a supply chain and FDev do not want to loose control over the populated area. If daisy chaining is necessary to colonise regions, it is possible for FDev to steer players away from it.i have a system i discovered years ago around 600LYs out from the bubble that i use for mining and a base, being able to colonise that system does appeal to me and so the daisy chain begins.
The chain itself is not the problem. Players claiming systems, build an outpost and then move on is the (potential) problem.The chain is a result of the mechanics, not the player.
Inara did not update the systems, that are (again) the players. They scan the system and send their data to Inara, EDSM and co. Why are you friends not supporting the player base by delivering data to the third parties sites?You can also see Inara hasn't updated that system for days.
because in that case even more overly eager Commanders would plunder the commodity-resources we disovered and use.Inara did not update the systems, that are (again) the players. They scan the system and send their data to Inara, EDSM and co. Why are you friends not supporting the player base by delivering data to the third parties sites?
and here you are already wrong - the Architect IS NOT THE OWNER!
- When first colonization outpost / station is finished colony owner is only one, who can dock on it, use the services.
UPDATE: YEESSSSSSSSSyes, so much yes - but if someone claims a system only to block another players progress, that IMHO is either System-ganking or galactic politics.
I must confess, I shortly was thinking of such as well, seeing another large group progressing in direction of my chain/ intermediate Target-System. And as I play 4 different chars, I easily could have done so as only two system were bridging into my lane. I refused to do so (the Galaxy belongs to all Players) and speeded up things instead, since reopening colonizing one system per day....
So lets see if a solo Cdr can beat an Influencer-Group to it![]()
and again: the problem is not the range limit (and it is 15ly). The problem are the players.People want to colonize systems, but problem with the whole colonization is the limitation of 16ly range.
Nope. Mechanic works as designed (as far as I can tell).One might even argue, that this might be even exploiting the game.
Another great stupid idea! Congratulation, you invented a perfect system to block other players. Build outpost and never touch it again...When first colonization outpost / station is finished colony owner is only one, who can dock on it, use the services.