Engineers Engineering Database And Calculator [Engineers Update]
- Thread starter Qohen Leth
- Start date
Wrong album? It's Armour, not Hull. Also, my screenies are from after 2.1.03
I made sort of a simplified crafting workbook based off the original in this thread. It has two sheets, the first is your component inventory and the second is all the blueprints.
You enter your inventory on the first sheet and the second will tell you what you can make.
I'll share if anyone is interested. Let me know where I can place it and how to do it.
You enter your inventory on the first sheet and the second will tell you what you can make.
I'll share if anyone is interested. Let me know where I can place it and how to do it.
Guys, if do you will find anything wrong on Inara, please poke me directly in the discussion on Inara. I surely miss any comments/fixes needed in this thread and Qohen can hardly do anything with it, when and if his data are correct.
Guys, if do you will find anything wrong on Inara, please poke me directly in the discussion on Inara. I surely miss any comments/fixes needed in this thread and Qohen can hardly do anything with it, when and if his data are correct.
Care to link the thread? Maybe since the two seem to be relying on each other in some ways, you could both cross-link these threads in the main OPs?
Inara uses the Doc's data. It's not a thread, the discussion is on Inara itself : http://inara.cz/board
Ohh.
I haven't used inara aside from data-browsing, I try to keep the amount of things I have to "register to use" down to the barest minimums. (Hence my absence from these forums til 2.1 came round and stirred up my concern
)Ohh.
I haven't used inara aside from data-browsing, I try to keep the amount of things I have to "register to use" down to the barest minimums. (Hence my absence from these forums til 2.1 came round and stirred up my concern
Man, I understand what you feel
Ohh.
I haven't used inara aside from data-browsing, I try to keep the amount of things I have to "register to use" down to the barest minimums. (Hence my absence from these forums til 2.1 came round and stirred up my concern
Well, in that case, PM here to me is good enough.
Just got to Selene Jean. No Commidities market or Universal Cartographics at the base. http://i.imgur.com/uMfgxlS.png
Try closing down your client - all the way out, launcher too probably - and coming back in
New update of my offline excel version :
http://s000.tinyupload.com/?file_id=38322921698597874065
(with more colors, and some additionnal search also... It would be very suprinsing if you have any request than this tool cannot answer with a few filters)
I also made an import from values given by EDuardo.re
If I do some update later, it will be a priority value on shopping list, to avoid an upgrade to steal components requiered for a more important one
http://s000.tinyupload.com/?file_id=38322921698597874065
(with more colors, and some additionnal search also... It would be very suprinsing if you have any request than this tool cannot answer with a few filters)
I also made an import from values given by EDuardo.re
If I do some update later, it will be a priority value on shopping list, to avoid an upgrade to steal components requiered for a more important one
Things are stagnant when FD doesn't open up more to find :| no news on any new engineers.
Updated unlock path pic: http://i.imgur.com/zU89Si5.jpg
Updated unlock path pic: http://i.imgur.com/zU89Si5.jpg
At least it gives us some time to develop the app!
Mmm, looking forward to it. I've burned out a bit so will wait for the next good patch.
edit: someone reported that Marco didn't give any progress when selling commodities. investigating.
Last edited:
A little hint to improve the database
First: big,big thanks for all your efforts and the great help for tons of CMDR's.
But now i have the regretable duty to inform you:
There is a complete "layer" or "matrix" for the different Shield Booster A,B,C,D,E missing.
Database and Inara.cz show a "C". Guess someone has submited a "C" blueprint screenshot set. "B" & "C" is byuable in outfitting.
The mark " Lei Cheung with lower shield Boost:0-43% " is simpy wrong. Maybe someone send a "B" screenshot.
Same for similiar entries at this page (http://inara.cz/galaxy-blueprint/8).
Most likely someone has send send a additional set "B" shield booster screenshots from only available set of Grade 1-3 there.
Always check the in the upper left corner shown module ...
Additional for the interested audience:
It has to be read as additional % of the (also primary in %) module function. For "shield boost", "mass" and all other.
So the "0E" shield booster" can get at Grade 5 from 4% with 0,5to up to 4 + 31,2 (+780%)= 35,2% max boost @ 2to max penalty 0,5+1,5(+300%)
The "0A shield booster" can get at Grade 5 from 20% with 3,5to up to 20 + 35,8 (+179%)= 55,8% max boost @ 14to max penalty 3,5+10,5(+300%)
(PIC max 0A booster example]
To verify for all and give a enhanced basis for your work here a complete imgur album of the shield booster blueprints:
http://imgur.com/a/VQTct
No clue why imgur dont like the "0E" Grade 1. For the database: boost 0-156% , 100-50% mass penalty, integrity 0-2, power 4-0
Unfortunatly the same seems for "Armour". Example here: Reactive Surface Composite - Lightwight
(PIC Armour example]
Not a friend of the "Hull Reinforcement Packages". But would expect similiar underlying "matrix".
If you imagine you had a collection with heavy discounted modules and try to reach the maximum at lowest costs (insurance) exact at these modules
you get a impression what trap Frontier has planted with this "Engineers" in my head .... ;-) What a game...
Can't believe being the first CMDR stumbled over this. No change against all "fish" beta tests. But the incomplete entries stand now to long here.
Greetings from "Canonn Interstellar Research" associate! Science with biscuits always helps.
For the Canonn.
We salute you!
Don't rep me! REP the main contributor here! Unbelievable efforts ...
_______________________________________________________________________
This post is a one time event since a long time. Account will go back to sleep.
Only reason was to honour your big efforts and contribute a little bit in the right direction.
Hope the info will find also the way to inara.cz via this channel. Great side!
(no native english speaker, hope you get what i wanted to bring in - check the album)
First: big,big thanks for all your efforts and the great help for tons of CMDR's.
But now i have the regretable duty to inform you:
There is a complete "layer" or "matrix" for the different Shield Booster A,B,C,D,E missing.
Database and Inara.cz show a "C". Guess someone has submited a "C" blueprint screenshot set. "B" & "C" is byuable in outfitting.
The mark " Lei Cheung with lower shield Boost:0-43% " is simpy wrong. Maybe someone send a "B" screenshot.
Same for similiar entries at this page (http://inara.cz/galaxy-blueprint/8).
Most likely someone has send send a additional set "B" shield booster screenshots from only available set of Grade 1-3 there.
Always check the in the upper left corner shown module ...
Additional for the interested audience:
It has to be read as additional % of the (also primary in %) module function. For "shield boost", "mass" and all other.
So the "0E" shield booster" can get at Grade 5 from 4% with 0,5to up to 4 + 31,2 (+780%)= 35,2% max boost @ 2to max penalty 0,5+1,5(+300%)
The "0A shield booster" can get at Grade 5 from 20% with 3,5to up to 20 + 35,8 (+179%)= 55,8% max boost @ 14to max penalty 3,5+10,5(+300%)
(PIC max 0A booster example]
To verify for all and give a enhanced basis for your work here a complete imgur album of the shield booster blueprints:
http://imgur.com/a/VQTct
No clue why imgur dont like the "0E" Grade 1.
For the database: boost 0-156% , 100-50% mass penalty, integrity 0-2, power 4-0 Unfortunatly the same seems for "Armour". Example here: Reactive Surface Composite - Lightwight
(PIC Armour example]
Not a friend of the "Hull Reinforcement Packages". But would expect similiar underlying "matrix".
If you imagine you had a collection with heavy discounted modules and try to reach the maximum at lowest costs (insurance) exact at these modules
you get a impression what trap Frontier has planted with this "Engineers" in my head .... ;-) What a game...
Can't believe being the first CMDR stumbled over this. No change against all "fish" beta tests. But the incomplete entries stand now to long here.
Greetings from "Canonn Interstellar Research" associate! Science with biscuits always helps.
For the Canonn.
We salute you!
Don't rep me! REP the main contributor here! Unbelievable efforts ...
_______________________________________________________________________
This post is a one time event since a long time. Account will go back to sleep.
Only reason was to honour your big efforts and contribute a little bit in the right direction.
Hope the info will find also the way to inara.cz via this channel. Great side!
(no native english speaker, hope you get what i wanted to bring in - check the album)
Guys, if do you will find anything wrong on Inara, please poke me directly in the discussion on Inara. I surely miss any comments/fixes needed in this thread and Qohen can hardly do anything with it, when and if his data are correct.
First: big,big thanks for all your efforts and the great help for tons of CMDR's.
But now i have the regretable duty to inform you:
There is a complete "layer" or "matrix" for the different Shield Booster A,B,C,D,E missing.
Database and Inara.cz show a "C". Guess someone has submited a "C" blueprint screenshot set. "B" & "C" is byuable in outfitting.
The mark " Lei Cheung with lower shield Boost:0-43% " is simpy wrong. Maybe someone send a "B" screenshot.
Same for similiar entries at this page (http://inara.cz/galaxy-blueprint/8).
Most likely someone has send send a additional set "B" shield booster screenshots from only available set of Grade 1-3 there.
Always check the in the upper left corner shown module ...
Additional for the interested audience:
It has to be read as additional % of the (also primary in %) module function. For "shield boost", "mass" and all other.
So the "0E" shield booster" can get at Grade 5 from 4% with 0,5to up to 4 + 31,2 (+780%)= 35,2% max boost @ 2to max penalty 0,5+1,5(+300%)
The "0A shield booster" can get at Grade 5 from 20% with 3,5to up to 20 + 35,8 (+179%)= 55,8% max boost @ 14to max penalty 3,5+10,5(+300%)
(PIC max 0A booster example]
http://i.imgur.com/yOKiONf.jpg
To verify for all and give a enhanced basis for your work here a complete imgur album of the shield booster blueprints:
http://imgur.com/a/VQTct
No clue why imgur dont like the "0E" Grade 1.
Unfortunatly the same seems for "Armour". Example here: Reactive Surface Composite - Lightwight
(PIC Armour example]
http://i.imgur.com/5GxWwK6.jpg
Not a friend of the "Hull Reinforcement Packages". But would expect similiar underlying "matrix".
If you imagine you had a collection with heavy discounted modules and try to reach the maximum at lowest costs (insurance) exact at these modules
you get a impression what trap Frontier has planted with this "Engineers" in my head .... ;-) What a game...
Can't believe being the first CMDR stumbled over this. No change against all "fish" beta tests. But the incomplete entries stand now to long here.
Greetings from "Canonn Interstellar Research" associate! Science with biscuits always helps.
For the Canonn.
We salute you!
Don't rep me! REP the main contributor here! Unbelievable efforts ...
_______________________________________________________________________
This post is a one time event since a long time. Account will go back to sleep.
Only reason was to honour your big efforts and contribute a little bit in the right direction.
Hope the info will find also the way to inara.cz via this channel. Great side!
(no native english speaker, hope you get what i wanted to bring in - check the album)
By default, the "Browse All" blueprint function will use C-rated module when possible. This is something no one accounted for because we assumed it gives the same percentage regardless of module rating.
heavy duty shield boost grade 1:
A-rated = 0-39%
B-rated = 0-43%
C-rated = 0-56%
So while Inara is technically not wrong, we need to check all the data again or put a huge disclaimer that this is for C-rated modules :\
Last edited:
I had feared this. I had asked for double-checks. Weeks ago.
Not having enough playtime (and doing enough on the side, I think), I couldn't check this particular problem. And here we are. Thanks for bringing the data, we'll do what we can but I'm afraid it won't be fixed soon.
Not having enough playtime (and doing enough on the side, I think), I couldn't check this particular problem. And here we are. Thanks for bringing the data, we'll do what we can but I'm afraid it won't be fixed soon.
Last edited: