Hi All.
I feel compelled to post a response to the Eurogamer article. I am not exactly over the moon with how my opinions have been portrayed and have communicated with the journalist in question about it.
I'm going to keep this brief and not go over every point but there's two things I want to make clear.
1. I do not consider myself the most famous ED player, Mobious or ObsidianAnt would get my vote for starters. I have challenged this remark the response being "My line about you being the game's most famous player is coming from my opinion. I appreciate that may not be accurate and makes you uncomfortable. I can certainly edit that to "one of Elite Dangerous' most famous players". I stand by the "his opinion counts" line though. I think you're being modest there - it certainly does!"
I hope this clears that up as I am very uncomfortable with how that came across.
2. In my interview (which lasted over half an hour) I went to great lengths to put across my backing for the Devs and my appreciation of how hard they work to make things good for all of us. Sadly none of this made it to the article. Nothing is perfect but I feel like I was presented as being on the wrong side of that debate. The "Salt" comment is something I find very funny because I think it's in at least a good part justified even if it wasn't tongue in cheek.
There are other points I could cover off but I'm not inclined to make this into a wall of text. Eurogamer have a job to do and I'm told the article was aimed at non Elite players. So this isn't a Eurogamer bash either. I just wanted to make some things clear.
Thank you for your time, and my love and thanks to all Canonn.
"Dr.A."
(Oh and if you are not doing our CG right now get in there and haul some stuff it's for a good cause
)
I feel compelled to post a response to the Eurogamer article. I am not exactly over the moon with how my opinions have been portrayed and have communicated with the journalist in question about it.
I'm going to keep this brief and not go over every point but there's two things I want to make clear.
1. I do not consider myself the most famous ED player, Mobious or ObsidianAnt would get my vote for starters. I have challenged this remark the response being "My line about you being the game's most famous player is coming from my opinion. I appreciate that may not be accurate and makes you uncomfortable. I can certainly edit that to "one of Elite Dangerous' most famous players". I stand by the "his opinion counts" line though. I think you're being modest there - it certainly does!"
I hope this clears that up as I am very uncomfortable with how that came across.
2. In my interview (which lasted over half an hour) I went to great lengths to put across my backing for the Devs and my appreciation of how hard they work to make things good for all of us. Sadly none of this made it to the article. Nothing is perfect but I feel like I was presented as being on the wrong side of that debate. The "Salt" comment is something I find very funny because I think it's in at least a good part justified even if it wasn't tongue in cheek.
There are other points I could cover off but I'm not inclined to make this into a wall of text. Eurogamer have a job to do and I'm told the article was aimed at non Elite players. So this isn't a Eurogamer bash either. I just wanted to make some things clear.
Thank you for your time, and my love and thanks to all Canonn.
"Dr.A."
(Oh and if you are not doing our CG right now get in there and haul some stuff it's for a good cause